Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

FiltersDC

10,000+ results

2.38s

  • United Electrical, Radio and MacHine Workers of America v. National Labor Relations Board, Star Expansion Industries Corp., Intervenor

    409 F.2d 150 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Feb 11, 1969

    NLRB v. … NLRB v.

    Cited 11 timesPublished
  • United States v. Perkins, Derrin A.

    138 F.3d 421 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Mar 20, 1998

    In addition, Sparrow's proffer asserted that Hartwell had signed his recantation "under duress" from appellant Board. … v.

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • Professional Cabin Crew Association v. National Mediation Board, an Agency of the United States, Independent Federation of Flight Attendants

    872 F.2d 456 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Apr 7, 1989

    Moreover, the Board’s position finds support in Air Canada v. … v.

    Cited 27 timesPublished
  • Erik Autor v. Penny Pritzker

    740 F.3d 176 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jan 17, 2014

    Before: TATEL and BROWN, Circuit Judges, and EDWARDS, Senior Circuit Judge. … The court first found Appellants’ claims foreclosed by Minnesota State Board for Community Colleges v.

    Cited 31 timesPublished
  • American Federation of Government Employees, Afl-Cio v. K. William O'connor, Special Counsel, Merit Systems Protection Board. National Treasury Employees Union v. K. William O'connor, Special Counsel, Merit Systems Protection Board

    747 F.2d 748 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Nov 2, 1984

    747 F.2d 748 241 U.S.App.D.C. 311 AMERICAN FEDERATION OF GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES, AFL-CIO, et al., Appellants, v. K. William O'CONNOR, Special Counsel, Merit Systems Protection Board. … Civil Aeronautics Board, 522 F.2d 107 (D.C.Cir.1975) (en banc); National Automatic Laundry & Cleaning Council v. Shultz, 443 F.2d 689 (D.C.Cir.1971); National Student Association v.

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Smith v. Fenty

    District Court, District of Columbia · Feb 16, 2010

    Defendants Fenty and Brown filed a joint motion to dismiss on September 24, 2009. See generally Fenty & Brown Mot. On September 28, 2009, the court advised the plaintiff, pursuant to Fox v. … Macharia v. United States, 334 F.3d 61, 64, 67 (D.C. Cir. 2003); Holy Land Found. for Relief & Dev. v. Ashcroft, 333 F.3d 156, 165 (D.C. Cir. 2003); Browning, 292 F.3d at 242.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Black v. District of Columbia

    466 F. Supp. 2d 177 · District Court, District of Columbia · Dec 20, 2006

    Plaintiff Jesse Lowe Black filed this action against Howard University police officer James Brown (“defendant Brown”), Howard University as Brown’s employer, and the District of Columbia alleging tortious conduct and constitutional … Homan v. Goyal, 711 A.2d 812, 818 (D.C.Cir.1998) (quoting Drejza v.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • City of Jersey City v. Consolidated Rail Corporation

    668 F.3d 741 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Feb 3, 2012

    Made of maroonish-brown ashlar, the edifice carries seven rail lines as high as twenty-seven feet above street level. … . § 11323(a)(2) (listing transactions which “may be carried out only with the approval and authorization of the Board”).

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Dock Builders, Shorers, House Movers, Pile Drivers & Foundation Workers, Local Union No. 1456 v. National Labor Relations Board

    505 F.2d 310 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · May 31, 1974

    PER CURIAM: This is a petition to review a decision and order of the National Labor Relations Board in an unfair labor practice proceeding in which the Board found that the Dock Builders Union 1 was in violation of §§ 8(b … The Board’s cross-petition for enforcement of its order will be granted. So ordered. .

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Dunn v. Shalala

    866 F. Supp. 595 · District Court, District of Columbia · Nov 9, 1994

    Brown v. Bowen, 794 F.2d at 707 . C. … Brown v. Bowen, 794 F.2d at 707 .

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Turay v. McHugh

    145 F. Supp. 3d 111 · District Court, District of Columbia · Nov 18, 2015

    Brown, 425 U.S. at 835; see also Howard v. Pritzker, 775 F.3d 430, 432 (D.C. … Brown, 425 U.S. at 833; see also Williams v. Bentsen, No. 93-5192, 1993 WL 469110, at *1 (D.C. Cir.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Hamilton v. Dunn

    46 App. D.C. 157 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Feb 19, 1917

    While we agree with the Examiners in Chief and the Assistant Commissioner that in no event, under the facts of this case, can it be said that Hamilton is the prior inventor (Matthes v. Burt, 24 App. D. C. 265; Brown v. … C. 499; and Dutcher v. Jackson, 44 App. D.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • KLEO AG v. Rivada Networks, Inc.

    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Aug 19, 2025

    Browning, 292 F.3d at 245; see also Fowler v. Curtis Publ’g Co., 182 F.2d 377, 379 (D.C. Cir. 1950). … Majority Op. 11 (quoting Browning v. Clinton, 292 F.3d 235, 245 (D.C. Cir. 2002)).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • The District of Columbia Armory Board v. D. G. Volkert, T/a Ewin Engineering Associates, and Reynolds Metals Company

    402 F.2d 215 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Sep 6, 1968

    See Filson v. Fountain, 90 U.S.App.D.C. 273 , 197 F.2d 383 (1952); cf. Brice v. … See Stanley v. Chastek, 34 Ill.App.2d 220 , 180 N.E.2d 512 (1962); Economy Fuse & Mfg. Co. v. Raymond Concrete Pile Co., 111 F.2d 875 (7th Cir. 1940); Certain-Teed Products Corp. v.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • International Union of Electrical, Radio & Machine Workers, AFL-CIO, Frigidaire Local 801 v. National Labor Relations Board

    307 F.2d 679 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 7, 1962

    See NLRB v. International Woodworkers, supra. … Assuming, arguendo, that the Board erroneously based its correct conclusion as to discrimination on another ground, we are free to affirm the Board without offending S. E. C. v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • General Radio Co. v. Watson

    188 F. Supp. 879 · District Court, District of Columbia · Feb 12, 1960

    The Board of Appeals (hereinafter referred to as the Board) on June 18, 1956, affirmed the examiner’s refusal of claim 34, the single claim before this Court, and which reads as follows: “34. … than copper to the brush track, and brush' track only — that portion of the wire which was bared for contact with the brush — it might be possible to prevent this destructive cycle. ****** “ * * * We had thought that the brown

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • In Re Goldsborough

    654 A.2d 1285 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Feb 23, 1995

    See, e.g., Fehlhaber v. … See, e.g., United States v.

    Cited 266 timesPublished
  • Miami Free Zone Corporation, Inc. v. Foreign Trade Zones Board, United States Department of Commerce, United States of America

    22 F.3d 1110 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Apr 15, 1994

    Trademarks v. United States, 790 F.2d 903, 906 (D.C.Cir.1986), aff'd in part sub nom. K Mart Corp. v. … See Traynor v. Turnage, 485 U.S. 535, 542 , 108 S.Ct. 1372, 1378 , 99 L.Ed.2d 618 (1988) (citing Bowen v.

    Cited 16 timesPublished
  • Matter of Burka

    423 A.2d 181 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Oct 21, 1980

    [Mathews v. Eldridge, 424 U.S. 319, 335 , 96 S.Ct. 893, 903 , 47 L.Ed.2d 18 (1976).] … Kelly, 397 U.S. 254 , 90 S.Ct. 1011 , 25 L.Ed.2d 287 (1970) (prohibiting termination of welfare benefits before an adversary hearing); Sniadach v.

    Cited 23 timesPublished
  • Lawrence v. Newsham

    District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 8, 2019

    See id.; see also Browning v. Clinton, 292 F.3d 235, 242 (D.C. Cir. 2002). … See Brown v. Sessoms, 774 F.3d 1016, 1023 (D.C.

    Cited 0 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.