Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

FiltersIL

10,000+ results

1.69s

  • People v. Jones

    241 Ill. App. 3d 228 · Appellate Court of Illinois · Feb 11, 1993

    Defendant argues there is no showing on the record that Fitch had the experience or training necessary to qualify him as an expert. … Finally, the opinion was clearly helpful to an understanding of his own testimony and that of R.M.B. We find no error in allowing the jury to hear Detective Fitch’s opinion.

    Cited 19 timesPublished
  • Neil v. Zell

    767 F. Supp. 2d 933 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Feb 28, 2011

    “To qualify as an employee benefit plan under ERISA ... and to qualify for preferred tax status ..., a plan must be created for the exclusive benefit of participating employees and also be structured to distribute benefits … Clearly, if the ESOP’s holdings in employer securities are worthless, the employees have lost certain of these deferred wages.” Valley Nat.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Ulm v. Memorial Medical Center

    2011 IL App (4th) 110421 · Appellate Court of Illinois · Jan 6, 2012

    To qualify as a clear mandate of public policy, “a matter must strike at the heart of a citizen’s social rights, duties, and responsibilities.” (Internal quotation marks omitted.) … Illinois Rule of Evidence 902(11) defines a qualifying certification with respect to a domestic record, in part, as “a written declaration under oath subject to the penalty of perjury.”

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Carroll v. Commonwealth Edison Co.

    147 Ill. App. 3d 909 · Appellate Court of Illinois · Sep 22, 1986

    Carroll’s deposition testimony, as well as the photographs of the shed, clearly reveal the contrary. … Thus, the evidence established the power lines were not hidden from view.

    Cited 11 timesPublished
  • Means v. City of Chicago

    535 F. Supp. 455 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Mar 1, 1982

    There is substantial disagreement over what standard of culpability plaintiff must allege and prove to establish that the municipality violated § 1983. … Clearly the internal decision made by OPS is not a judicial or other action entitled to a res judicata effect.

    Disapproved by Craig S. Strauss v. City of Chicago, a Municipal Corporation, and Chicago Police Officer John Doe, 760 F.2d 765 (1985)Cited 41 timesPublished
  • People v. King

    2019 IL 123926 · Illinois Supreme Court · Jan 24, 2020

    Safarik testified that he also conducts “equivocal death evaluations” in cases where the “manner of death is not well established.” … ¶ 52 The applicable law is well established.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Leibovitch v. Syrian Arab Republic

    25 F. Supp. 3d 1071 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Mar 31, 2014

    Leibovitch I and Leibovitch II previously established that jurisdiction exists over Plaintiffs’ claims and that Iran’s immunity has been waived. Leibovitch I, 2011 WL 444762 , at *9; Leibovitch II, 697 F.3d at 562 . … See Oveissi II, 768 F.Supp.2d at 27 (grandparent qualified for solatium damages due to parent-child type of relationship with victim).

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Pursley v. City of Rockford

    District Court, N.D. Illinois · Jun 4, 2024

    that Gunnell violated a clearly established right. … But as Pursley explains, he disagrees with Gunnell’s dismissal because the Court found that he had failed to respond to the ISP defendants’ qualified immunity argument.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Hickey v. State ex rel. Huber

    48 Ill. Ct. Cl. 376 · Court of Claims of Illinois · May 23, 1995

    In affirming the trial courts dismissal of the suit, the appellate court held that the doctrine of sovereign immunity applied to bar a claim against the trooper in circuit court because the trooper had been performing one … While we express sympathy for plaintiff in this case, our duty is to adhere to our clearly established precedent.” (Sepmeyer v. Holman (1994), 162 Ill. 2d 249, 256 , 642 N.E.2d 1242, 1245 .)

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Netto v. Goldenberg

    266 Ill. App. 3d 174 · Appellate Court of Illinois · Sep 2, 1994

    A proponent of an expert witness must establish that the physician (1) is a licensed member of the school of medicine about which the physician will testify and (2) that the physician is familiar with procedures, treatments … physicians are qualified if they are familiar with that standard.

    Overruled on other grounds by Holton v. Memorial Hospital, 176 Ill. 2d 95 (1997)Cited 38 timesPublished
  • Wierenga v. Board of Fire & Police Commissioners

    40 Ill. App. 3d 270 · Appellate Court of Illinois · Jun 8, 1976

    Stat. 1971, ch. 24, par. 3 — 14—1), plaintiff was required to be a qualified elector of the municipality which he served as a fireman, and that Cicero was not authorized to enact an ordinance permitting its firemen to reside … Not only are the existence and legality of the 1928 rules questionable, or at least not clearly established by the record, but we cannot say that plaintiff was in noncompliance with these rules, if indeed they do apply.

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • Board of Education of Gardner-South Wilmington High School District 73 v. Village of Gardner

    2014 IL App (3d) 130364 · Appellate Court of Illinois · Jan 13, 2015

    The agreement clearly grants the Village a mere 2 To the extent that section 11-74.4-8(b) requires that the license agreement needs to qualify as a redevelopment project cost to authorize the … Village’s payment of tax increment funds to the District, the license agreement clearly qualifies.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • People v. Valentine

    221 Ill. App. 3d 1082 · Appellate Court of Illinois · Nov 15, 1991

    Despite the fact that defendant presented some evidence that he was intoxicated and/or under the influence of drugs at the time of the offense, the bulk of the evidence clearly established that defendant was capable of acting … The amounts of the various intoxicants that Valentine actually consumed were not established.

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • Aetitus v. Spring Valley Coal Co.

    246 Ill. 32 · Illinois Supreme Court · Jun 29, 1910

    If it were necessary to show an evil intent or any blamable conduct to establish the willfulness contemplated by this statute then there would be more force in this contention. … The intent and purpose of this statute is to require the mine owner to provide a light at the bottom of the shaft of sufficient capacity to enable any person approaching the bottom to clearly discern the cage and the objects

    Cited 27 timesPublished
  • People v. Salgado

    263 Ill. App. 3d 238 · Appellate Court of Illinois · Jun 14, 1994

    Unless a prior inconsistent statement clearly qualifies under section 115 — 10.1, it is not admissible as substantive evidence. People v. Redd (1990), 135 Ill. 2d 252, 314 . … Some qualified under section 115 — 10.1 as substantive evidence, and others did not.

    Cited 54 timesPublished
  • Lawrence E. Jaffe Pension Plan v. Household International, Inc.

    237 F.R.D. 176 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Jul 6, 2006

    Plaintiffs are correct that documents created in the ordinary course of business do not qualify for protection. … immunity.

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • Morris v. The City of Chicago

    District Court, N.D. Illinois · Aug 20, 2025

    In Klaassen, the Seventh Circuit explained that plaintiffs who qualified for Indiana University’s religious exemption for the COVID-19 vaccination did not establish a justiciable controversy. 7 F.4th at 593.8 … Illinois Tort Immunity Act The City also contends that the Illinois Tort Immunity Act, 745 Ill. Comp. Stat. 10/2-101, et. seq, bars Morris’s claims.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Wolfgram v. Miller

    District Court, N.D. Illinois · Sep 30, 2023

    Plaintiffs’ claims are not clearly barred by the Illinois Tort Immunity Act or the Illinois School Code. … Additionally, Plaintiffs’ claims are not clearly barred by the Illinois Tort Immunity Act or the Illinois School Code.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Griffin v. Poynter

    District Court, C.D. Illinois · Sep 30, 2021

    ’s clearly established constitutional rights. … “Qualified immunity shields a government official from liability for damages when the official’s conduct does not violate clearly established statutory or constitutional rights of which a reasonable person would have known

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Allen v. City of Chicago

    828 F. Supp. 543 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Jul 2, 1993

    Based on this information, plaintiffs claim that at least 1,800 employees qualify as class members. … Plaintiffs do not, and clearly cannot, make such allegations.

    Cited 64 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.