Case law

Welch v. Coglan

126 Md. 1 · Court of Appeals of Maryland · Apr 14, 1915

The power to enact and enforce them is lodged by the people with the government of the State, qualified only by such conditions as to the manner of its exercise as are necessary to secure the individual citizen from unjust … The Circuit Court of Baltimore County was, therefore, clearly correct when it stated in its opinion, that the proposed sewerage system, although a work of internal improvement, did not fall within the class of such works

Burroughs v. Raynor

56 Md. App. 432 · Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · Dec 7, 1983

“Verify” means “[t]o prove to be true; to confirm; to establish the truth, correctness, or authenticity of . .. . ” New Webster Encyclopedia Dictionary of the English Language p. 932. … Speaking through Judge Oppenheimer, the court held: Clearly, the provisions of [Art.

Brown

District Court, D. Maryland · Aug 25, 2026

Brown states that the department heads make official visits every Tuesday to every housing unit and are clearly aware of the lack of sanitation in the housing units. II. … Further, Brown provides no factual allegation establishing that Drs.

First Financial Insurance v. GLM, Inc.

88 F. Supp. 2d 425 · District Court, D. Maryland · Feb 11, 2000

The Underlying Complaint has clearly alleged that it was GLM’s negligence which caused Boyer’s injuries. … This allegation qualifies as a claim against defendant arising out of defendant’s “... omission in connection with the prevention ... of an assault or bat *430 tery” causing Boyer’s bodily injuries.

Town of Glenarden v. Bromery

257 Md. 19 · Court of Appeals of Maryland · Feb 11, 1970

Number 4 established regular town elections on the first Monday in May in odd numbered years, and amendment Number 7 set up a special election and directed that the mayor and councilmen elected at that special election should … Judge Bruñe thereafter said (at p. 143 of 208 Md.) : “We think, however, that this is clearly a case in which the provisions of Sections 11-18 of Art. 23A of the Code, enacted to implement Article XI-E, and particularly to

Royal Indemnity Co. v. Stevenson

309 F. Supp. 1086 · District Court, D. Maryland · Mar 6, 1970

Methods of establishing proof of financial responsibility. … As may be seen by the use of the words “is generally held * * * although there is some authority to the contrary”; “Moreover”; “However, courts frequently find * * * ”, the law is far from clearly and firmly established in

Dickson v. State

188 Md. App. 489 · Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · Oct 28, 2009

“It is for the court to say whether [the witness’s] silence is justified, and to require [the witness] to answer if ‘it clearly appears to the court that he is mistaken.’ ” Hoffman, 341 U.S. at 486 , 71 S.Ct. 814 (quoting … Of course, the State also could remedy this problem by offering a witness in that situation immunity for his or her testimony against the defendant. 13 .

Walker v. State

190 Md. App. 577 · Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · Feb 25, 2010

FACTS Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the State, it was established that on March 17, 2008, the appellant repeatedly hit Tahlene Shipley and bit her on the cheek when the two became involved in a disagreement … We held that “[t]he record clearly demonstrates that Davis did not waive her right to counsel.” Id. at 381, 641 A.2d 941 .

McCray v. Burrell

367 F. Supp. 1191 · District Court, D. Maryland · Oct 16, 1973

Chapter 210 establishes an Inmate Grievance Commission as an arm of the Department of Public Safety and Correctional Services. … Such behavior was clearly present in the instant case.

Preston v. Preston

149 Md. 498 · Court of Appeals of Maryland · Jan 14, 1926

witness, they must be clearly and satisfactorily proven. … Warford, 20 Md. 393 , where the court speaks of the “contents” of a will without the qualifying word “entire,” and says: “The objection that the appellees were not entitled to set up the will of 1847, as a revocation of the

Evans v. State

113 Md. App. 347 · Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · Jan 29, 1997

Cornish clearly does not hold that the police may not free the defendant and formally charge him later. The majority cites another Maryland case, McChan v. … It would be far better to establish a rule that encourages consultation rather than establish one that punishes conscientious police for their desire to do what is proper, as well as lawful.

(2010)

95 Op. Att'y Gen. 138 · Maryland Attorney General Reports · Aug 17, 2010

The Board feels that physical therapists, especially those with manual therapy skills, are qualified to perform dry needling." Letter of Charles M. … In answering such a question we first look to whether the General Assembly has clearly resolved the issue.

Polk v. State

378 Md. 1 · Court of Appeals of Maryland · Nov 12, 2003

Id. at 478 , 451 A.2d at 122 . [4] Diehl subsequently was qualified by our holding in Eanes v. … Diehl's words, we concluded, although specifically directed at the police officer, did not qualify as "fighting words" because they were spoken, not as a "personally abusive epithet hurled to invoke immediate and violent

Premium of America, LLC v. Sanchez

213 Md. App. 91 · Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · Aug 29, 2013

of law, established an “intimate nexus.” … It must clearly appear that the parties intend to recognize him as the primary party in interest and as privy to the promise.” (quoting Mackubin v.

Newman v. State

Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · Apr 4, 2018

What has been omitted, inadvertently or advertently, in such a formulation is the critical qualifier “unfair.” … Even in a case where the defendant might not be challenging the establishment of his identity, it would still be incumbent on the State to prove the identity of the defendant and to establish his criminal agency.

Jones v. State

44 Md. App. 417 · Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · Dec 17, 1979

Jones established ownership to six (6) of the rings, and they were returned to her. The trooper said that "[t]he others were stolen." … In his opinion for the Court of Appeals, Judge Orth made it very clear that only intentional conduct can qualify as overreaching. Thus far, everyone seems to be in agreement.

In Re Sydnor

431 B.R. 584 · United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Maryland · Jun 11, 2010

As to the latter grounds it is clearly established that Sydnor has not paid fees that are statutorily due to the United States Trustee and has not made a payment against that outstanding balance since September of 2009. … Clearly, cause has been established pursuant to Section 1112(b)(4)(K) as to the non-payment of fees and such cause requires this court to either dismiss the case or order the case converted to a case under Chapter 7, unless

Merling v. Merling

98 Md. App. 243 · Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · Nov 30, 1993

Evidence is material if it tends to establish a proposition that has legal significance to the litigation. … The circumstances had clearly changed, however, demonstrating a basis for a change of mind by the testatrix.

Dakrish, LLC v. Raich

209 Md. App. 119 · Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · Nov 30, 2012

Raich had been qualified before, that there was not “any question” that Mr. … I think ... if you can find a location—not in this immediate area—clearly, I think there is no question that you’re qualified to have a license.

Lubore v. RPM Associates, Inc.

109 Md. App. 312 · Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · Apr 4, 1996

One who conceals facts that materially qualify affirmative representations may be liable for fraud. Finch, 57 Md.App. at 239 , 469 A.2d 867 . … In addition to the duty element, appellant clearly satisfied the other elements of the tort.