Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
0.46s
Haaayy, LLC v. Illinois Department of Financial & Professional Regulation
2024 IL App (1st) 221833 · Appellate Court of Illinois · Sep 26, 2024
Finally, the amendment established two additional lotteries—the “Qualifying Applicant Lottery” and the “Social Equity Justice Involved Lottery”—and authorized the Department to award 55 additional Licenses under each of … As discussed, in amending the Act, the General Assembly established two additional License lotteries: the Qualifying Applicant Lottery and the Social Equity Justice Involved Lottery.
Cited 1 timesPublished258 Ill. App. 3d 645 · Appellate Court of Illinois · Dec 30, 1993
The record shows that this case is vastly different from the Hovanec case cited by defendant, where the prosecutor repeatedly asked clearly objectionable questions to which the court had already sustained objections. … However, that is not the standard by which a witness is qualified as an expert.
Cited 25 timesPublishedGreat American Insurance v. West Bend Mutual Insurance
311 Ill. App. 3d 534 · Appellate Court of Illinois · Jan 11, 2000
The case does not stand for the proposition stated, which is contrary to established law. … The insurance policy here has no provision clearly excluding coverage for violations of the Act or other statutory torts, although West Bend easily could have modified its policy so to provide.
Cited 8 timesPublishedQuality Saw and Seal v. Illinois Commerce Commission
Appellate Court of Illinois · Jun 27, 2007
Section 2.3 does not specify a threshold amount of material to be "moved, removed, or otherwise displaced" for it to qualify as excavation. … Also, Quality Saw does not attempt to establish the ambiguity of section 2.3 before resorting to regulations, foreign statutes, and cases as interpretive aids.
Cited 0 timesPublished245 Ill. App. 3d 1042 · Appellate Court of Illinois · Jun 10, 1993
While caseworkers from OSG testified about the type and dosage of psychotropic drugs currently prescribed for the wards, the court found that the caseworkers were not qualified to establish whether the purpose was therapeutic … Stat. 1991, ch. llOVa, par. 11a — 17(d)), contends that Hlinois law and public policy “clearly favor” decision making on matters of health care without judicial intervention.
Cited 10 timesPublishedAppellate Court of Illinois · Oct 3, 1996
Based upon our review of the record, we conclude that the trial did not clearly abuse its discretion in its property division and debt allocation. … Reviewing the record before us, although this court may have decided differently, we cannot conclude that the trial court clearly abused its discretion by determining that (1) McGee was not qualified as an expert, and (2)
Cited 0 timesPublished415 Ill. 564 · Illinois Supreme Court · Sep 24, 1953
: “The general assembly shall not pass local or special laws in any of the following enumerated cases, that is to say: for * * * granting to any corporation, association or individual any special or exclusive privilege, immunity … We have above pointed out that the plaintiffs are clearly mistaken in assuming the waitresses and manageresses are permitted to draw, pour or mix alcoholic liquors.
Cited 23 timesPublishedBarnhill v. CITY OF CHICAGO, POLICE DEPT.
142 F. Supp. 2d 948 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Mar 6, 2001
Plaintiffs have presented the following evidence for the purpose of establishing discriminatory intent. … A combination of methods ... may maximize the reasonableness of the qualifying score established.” (Id. at 38.) 7 . The Standard Error of Measurement used by Dr.
Cited 5 timesPublishedAppellate Court of Illinois · Dec 4, 1998
The court also conditionally granted the City a JNOV on immunity grounds but denied its motion for judgment on another special interrogatory and its conditional motion for a new trial. … Restatement (Second) §229(1) and Comment a, at 506. 8: The City admits in its brief to this Court that the fact that the City disciplines officers for failing to safeguard their weapons was established at trial and was never
Cited 0 timesPublishedWader v. Macon County, Illinois and Illinois Dept. of Transportation
2025 IL App (5th) 240852-U · Appellate Court of Illinois · Oct 17, 2025
The dissent’s assertions are both incredible and concerning because the issues were clearly addressed in the briefs on appeal. … Clearly, this “allegation” is a legal conclusion as it contains no factual information to support the conclusion.
Cited 0 timesUnpublished78 F. Supp. 3d 916 · District Court, C.D. Illinois · Jan 27, 2015
Titus was clearly aware of De-Backer’s mental distress. … IX.Immunity Titus asserts the affirmative defense of immunity under the Tort Immunity Act.
Cited 2 timesPublished218 F. Supp. 3d 730 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Oct 31, 2016
Ill. 2016) (“Defendant’s actions in this case are clearly referrals under the Anti-Kickback Statute.”). … It was, however, perfectly reasonable for the jury to reject Williams’ advice of counsel argument because she failed to adduce evidence to establish that defense.
Cited 6 timesPublished837 F. Supp. 2d 933 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Nov 15, 2011
immunity. … Incorporated Vill. of Garden City, 290 F.Supp.2d 341, 344 (E.D.N.Y.2003) (“To establish a claim under the DPPA, the plaintiff must establish ... that the defendants caused a DMV search to be made as to each plaintiff.”);
Cited 2 timesPublished978 N.E.2d 1086 · Appellate Court of Illinois · Oct 16, 2012
As noted above, disabled firefighters who do not qualify for benefits pursuant to the Act may qualify for continuation of coverage pursuant to section 367f of the Illinois Insurance Code, the firemen’ … The Act-qualified employee is therefore put in the position he would have been in had he not been injured.
Cited 8 timesPublished196 B.R. 402 · United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois · May 9, 1996
On March 23, 1995, a memorandum of judgment was filed with the Recorder of Deeds of Kane County, Illinois, which established a judicial lien clouding the title upon the Debtor’s residence. … In Paeplow, 972 F.2d 730 and In re Hunter 970 F.2d 299 (7th Cir.1992), the Seventh Circuit construed the Indiana tenancy by the entirety statute, which is clearly distinct from the Illinois statute.
Cited 30 timesPublished2018 IL App (3d) 160124 · Appellate Court of Illinois · Feb 25, 2019
If we find the records were properly admitted, we will then consider de novo whether they establish that the breath test machine at issue “was tested for accuracy and working properly on the date the test was … In addition, Trooper Sheldon certified the breath test machine as accurate in the logbook on June 5, 2015. ¶ 31 In sum, the State’s exhibits, which were properly admitted into evidence, clearly show that
Cited 4 timesPublishedWeinstein v. Metropolitan Life Insurance
389 Ill. 571 · Illinois Supreme Court · Mar 21, 1945
You have qualified for our Whole Life Plan, and many men who are eligible for standard policies are not able to obtain policies on this select Plan. … These high standards, of course, react to the advantage of those men who are able to qualify for a Whole Life policy, since they mean a reduction in premiums.
Cited 63 timesPublished557 F. Supp. 703 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Feb 3, 1983
This action is set for a status hearing December 13, 1982 at 9 a.m. to establish the procedure for Respondents’ compliance. … Of course, as Conclusion 9 of the Order recognized, the Fifth Amendment does not immunize all private information from seizure.
Reversed on other grounds by United States of America and Gerald T. Padar, Special Agent, Internal Revenue Service v. Helen v. Porter and Nickolaus Beligratis, 711 F.2d 1397 (1983)Cited 4 timesPublishedIllinois Supreme Court · Mar 20, 2003
Here, Sarnelle testified to his credentials and Kamm admits that they were sufficient to qualify Sarnelle as an expert. … Here, in contrast, there was no question that Sarnelle was qualified to render the opinions he offered at trial, and there was no missing link failing to establish all of the elements of Snelson’s case.
Cited 0 timesPublishedDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · Aug 26, 2022
When challenged in a civil case, an officer’s probable cause determination is entitled to an additional layer of deference via qualified immunity. … But even short of that, their determination was undoubtedly reasonable, such that both are entitled to qualified immunity. Indeed, courts have granted qualified immunity on weaker facts than these.
Cited 0 timesUnknown
Ask Donna