Case law

Attorney Grievance Commission v. Garcia

410 Md. 507 · Court of Appeals of Maryland · Aug 28, 2009

Because N.V. did not have the employment background and experience needed to qualify for that position, a false letter was created and filed in support of the forms filed with INS. The letter was drafted by Mr. … If no exceptions are filed, the Court may treat the findings of fact as established for the purpose of determining appropriate sanctions, if any. (B) If exceptions are filed.

Cochran v. Parnardi

District Court, D. Maryland · Dec 1, 2021

The State of Maryland has not waived such immunity for claims brought pursuant to § 1983. Accordingly, Defendants are immune from suit for actions taken in their official capacity. II. … immunity is not necessary.

Goshen Run HOA v. Cisneros

467 Md. 74 · Court of Appeals of Maryland · Jan 27, 2020

To the extent that the assessments were to be used to improve or maintain commonly-owned areas, that purpose, too, qualifies as “personal, family, or household.” … The language in the Promissory Note clearly reflects that it consists of an extension of credit for the payment of HOA assessments—a debt incurred by Ms.

Lamone v. Schlakman

Court of Appeals of Maryland · Feb 1, 2017

A temporary restraining order may be granted only if it clearly appears from specific facts shown by affidavit or other statement under oath that immediate, substantial, and irreparable … Sparaco’s candidacy as early as August 2, 2016, when the State Board posted the names of the qualified candidates on its website.

Royal Investment Group, LLC v. Wang

183 Md. App. 406 · Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · Dec 4, 2008

Id. “ ‘[I]n other words, to establish a contract the minds of the parties must be in agreement as to its terms.’ ” Mitchell v. AARP Life Ins. Program, New York Life Ins. … We believe these rulings clearly prohibited Royal from further trespassing onto the Property.

Martin v. Baltimore County Police Department

District Court, D. Maryland · Jul 30, 2024

However, the complaint must allege sufficient facts to establish those elements.” Walters v. … immunity.

Green v. State

25 Md. App. 679 · Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · May 1, 1975

Beyond that, although offered no immunity, his cooperation would not go unnoticed in regard to his own investigation. As rumors increased, so too did Mr. Green’s trepidation. The $750.00 cash payment by Mr. … That ruling clearly was not error.

Wood v. Wood

227 Md. 211 · Court of Appeals of Maryland · Dec 14, 1961

The case is almost wholly one of fact and of the application to the facts of established rules of law. … The legal effect of this commitment under Code 1957, Art. 59, § 31 presumably made by two qualified physicians after separate examinations is that the wife was insane and that the disease required her to be placed in a hospital

Miles v. State

88 Md. App. 360 · Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · Sep 6, 1991

Even though the jury remains composed of competent and qualified jurors, the judge has remolded it with a new “tilt.” … bad faith on the part of the prosecutor in the statement of what the prosecutor expects to prove or establish substantial prejudice resulting therefrom.

Rockower Bros. v. Comptroller of Treasury

240 Md. 379 · Court of Appeals of Maryland · Dec 7, 1965

In paragraph 11, it was provided, that the licensee shall furnish and engage qualified and competent employees for the conduct of the department. … Prior to collection, the customer, who had taken a qualified possession of an article, could change his mind and return it to the racks or counter and take a qualified possession of another article in its place or indeed

County Commissioners v. English

182 Md. 514 · Court of Appeals of Maryland · Dec 15, 1943

Jackson, 170 Md. 251 , at pages 264 and 265, 183 A. 534 , 539: “For those ‘who make the law’ are to govern by promulgated, established laws, not to be varied in particular cases, but to have one rule for rich and poor, ‘for … But, as stated by the lower court, ‘the thing really taxed is the act of the owner in taking his property out of storage into his own possession (absolute or qualified) for the purpose of making some one of the only uses

Stisser v. SP Bancorp, Inc.

234 Md. App. 593 · Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · Nov 29, 2017

In this way, “restrictions on personal jurisdiction ‘are more than a guarantee of immunity from inconvenient or distant litigation. … Clearly, Green did not intend to establish continuing obligations in Maryland by forming Searchlight.

Albert v. Franchot

District Court, D. Maryland · Jan 26, 2024

Sovereign Immunity 1. … In fact, one of the reasons Knick gave for rejecting Williamson County’s state- compensation requirement is that this rule had “effectively established an exhaustion requirement

Reed v. State

353 Md. 628 · Court of Appeals of Maryland · Apr 21, 1999

If the motion in limine ruling was definitive, and thus a final ruling, does it remain admissible even though subsequent events at trial have established that it is not relevant? … That language in Prout was qualified by a requirement that the court make clear that its ruling was intended to be definitive. .

United States v. Cohen

275 F. Supp. 724 · District Court, D. Maryland · Oct 27, 1967

Judge Brown, however, noted his “weak concurrence” with Judge Rives’ interpretation of the standards Congress intended to establish by its 1957 legislation. … But an imperfect system is not equivalent to purposeful discrimination based on race. * * * In the cases at bar, the system was clearly not haphazard.

Pulley v. State

287 Md. 406 · Court of Appeals of Maryland · Apr 10, 1980

With the timeliness of the motion to dismiss the indictment on former jeopardy grounds established, we turn now to its merits, which are so patently frivolous that we can reject petitioner’s claim of error from its denial … However, we conclude that a retrial under the circumstances present here is clearly permissible. As Judge Eldridge made plain for this Court in Jourdan v.

United States v. Morton

314 F. Supp. 2d 509 · District Court, D. Maryland · Mar 24, 2004

Council Inc., 509 U.S. 155, 188 , 113 S.Ct. 2549 , 125 L.Ed.2d 128 (1993) (“Acts of Congress normally do not have extraterritorial application unless such intent is clearly manifested.”). … Government housing facility in Landstuhl, Germany qualifies as “land[] reserved or acquired for the use of the United States.”

Maryland Board of Physicians v. Elliott

170 Md. App. 369 · Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · Sep 13, 2006

A major premise is thus established. … The appellant, Maryland Board of Physicians, both under its present name and under its former name of Board of Physician Quality Assurance, clearly qualifies as an “Agency” within the definition of § 10-202(b).

Doe v. Montgomery County Board of Elections

406 Md. 697 · Court of Appeals of Maryland · Dec 19, 2008

Clearly, Roskelly, as the petition sponsor, was “aggrieved” on June 8 when a final determination denying certification was made. … State Board to establish process (b) State Board to establish process. — The State Board, by regulation, shall establish the process to be followed by all election authorities for verifying and counting signatures on petitions

Superior Court of California Ex Rel. Jones v. Ricketts

153 Md. App. 281 · Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · Dec 1, 2003

(b) Remedies when defense established. … (c) Failure to establish defense.