Case law

Dennis Uniform Manufacturing v. Teresi

119 Or. App. 447 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Apr 21, 1993

See Shoulders v. SAIF, 300 Or 606, 609-10 , 716 P2d 751 (1986). Reconsideration allowed; opinion modified and adhered to as modified; affirmed. … Multnomah County School Dist. v. Tigner, 113 Or App 405 , 833 P2d 1294 (1992), is distinguishable.

Carroll v. Boise Cascade Corp.

138 Or. App. 610 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jan 24, 1996

MVD, 319 Or 259, 268 , 875 P2d 463 (1994); deParrie v. … England, 315 Or at 639 ; see also Smith v.

Sweeney v. Multnomah County Assessor, Tc-Md 090313c (or.tax 6-30-2009)

Oregon Tax Court · Jun 30, 2009

Plaintiff did not appeal to the county board of property tax appeals (board) in 2006 because she was unaware of the appeal process until after the December 31, 2006, board petition deadline. … See Lee's v. Dept. of Rev. , TC 4830, WL 924976 *1 (Apr 6, 2009) (ruling that statutes do not permit taxpayers to appeal "their own actions in agreeing to values."). B.

SAIF Corp. v. Vanlanen

127 Or. App. 346 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Apr 20, 1994

Claimant requests reconsideration of our decision in this case, arguing that our reliance on Diamond Fruit Growers v. … SAIF sought Board review of the referee’s order. Under Diamond Fruit Growers v.

Meza v. Bruce Packing Co.

186 Or. App. 452 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Feb 19, 2003

In Ogden Aviation v. … The Supreme Court considered the contours of that policy in Sekermestrovich [v. SAIF, 280 Or 723 , 573 P2d 275 (1977)].

Kolar v. B & C CONTRACTORS

36 Or. App. 65 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Sep 6, 1978

The referee and the Board were correct in concluding he was temporarily out of the state incidental to his employment with B & C, an Oregon employer. Employer relies on House v. State Ind. Ace. … Smith v. Ed’s Pancake House, 27 *71 Or App 361 , 556 P2d 158 (1976); Minnesota Mining & Manuf. Co. v. SAIF, 27 Or App 747 , 556 P2d 1379 (1976); Barackman v.

Bauman v. State Accident Insurance Fund Corp.

62 Or. App. 323 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Mar 23, 1983

The Board relied on Frasure v. Agripac, 290 Or 99 , 619 P2d 274 (1980), and Saxton v. Lamb-Weston, 49 Or App 887 , 621 P2d 619 (1980), and concluded that SAIF had authority to deny the previously accepted claim. … In Jacobson v.

Jeld-Wen, Inc. v. Molena

166 Or. App. 396 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Apr 5, 2000

See Burris v. SAIF Corp., 116 Or App 498, 500 , 841 P2d 696 (1992), rev den 315 Or 442 (1993); Morrow v. Pacific University, 100 Or App 198, 200 , 785 P2d 787 (1990). … The Board’s finding is supported by substantial evidence, as the portion of the ALJ’s opinion quoted above demonstrates. See Dietz v.

State v. Boldt

116 Or. App. 480 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Nov 18, 1992

State v. Brown, 306 Or 599, 607 , 761 P2d 1300 (1988). Whether the evidence entitles a defendant to a jury instruction on a defense is governed by the statutory requirements for establishing the defense. … See State v. Brown, supra, 306 Or at 606-07 . The court erred when it failed to give defendant’s requested jury instructions.

Peabody v. SAIF

Court of Appeals of Oregon · May 24, 2023

The board adhered to its decision. Claimant petitioned for judicial review, challenging the board’s decision to award $12,500 in attorney fees, rather than the $31,000 claimant had requested. Peabody v. … See Friends of Columbia Gorge v. Energy Fac.

Department of Justice, Inmate Insurance Fund v. Hendershott

108 Or. App. 584 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Sep 4, 1991

The Board did not err in affirming the referee’s award of attorney fees. In Jones v. … However, the Board did err in awarding fees for services on Board review. ORS 656.382(2) authorizes fees only when a claimant’s right to compensation is at risk on review. Howard v.

Birmingham v. Department of Forestry

209 Or. App. 736 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Dec 13, 2006

Thomas Creek Lumber v. Board of Forestry, 188 Or App 10, 22 , 69 P3d 1238 (2003). … We give deference to an agency’s interpretation of its own rule if it is not “inconsistent with the wording of the rule itself, or with the rule’s context, or with any other source of law[.j” Don’t Waste Oregon Com. v.

State v. Campbell

289 Or. App. 442 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Dec 28, 2017

The Supreme Court recognized one such exception, the automobile exception, in State v. Brown , 301 Or. 268 , 273-79, 721 P.2d 1357 (1986). … State v.

Oregon & Washington Savings Bank v. Catlin

15 Or. 342 · Oregon Supreme Court · Oct 24, 1887

As this was not done, the board was not authorized to do otherwise than reject it. Theré is also another objection which is fatal to this proceeding, the county and not the board is the proper party. … In Wood v. *345 Riddle, 14 Or. 254 , it was said by StbahAN, J.: “In all analogous cases in this State, from Thompson v. Multnomah County, 2 Or. 34 , to Pruden v.

Hildenbrand v. City of Adair Village

217 Or. App. 623 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Feb 6, 2008

.”); Citizens Against Irresponsible Growth v. … Parklane Development, Inc. v.

M. W. V. H. v. Van Hoff

307 Or. App. 620 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Nov 25, 2020

Brown v. Roach, 249 Or App 579, 580, 277 P3d 628 (2012). We view the evidence, and all reasonable inferences that may be drawn from it, in the light most favorable to petitioner. Delgado v. … Brown, 249 Or App at 580. Therefore, we decline respondent’s invitation to review de novo. 622 M. W. V. H. v.

Denton v. EBI Companies

67 Or. App. 339 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Mar 14, 1984

SAIF v. Parker, 61 Or App 47 , 656 P2d 335 (1982). We agree with the Board that EBI has not perfected a lien for the time loss payments made before the stipulation. … Any conflict as to what may be a just and proper distribution shall be resolved by the board.” See Schlecht v. SAIF, 60 Or App 449, 455, n 5 , 653 P2d 1284 (1982).

SAIF Corp. v. Henwood

176 Or. App. 431 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Sep 5, 2001

See Progress Quarries v. … .”); 1 The New Portland Meadows v.

Liberty Northwest Ins. Corp. v. Rector

151 Or. App. 693 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Dec 17, 1997

Messmer v. Deluxe Cabinet Works, 130 Or App 254, 257 , 881 P2d 180 (1994), rev den 320 Or 507 (1995). … Corp. v. Bird, 99 Or App 560, 564 , 783 P2d 33 (1989), rev den 309 Or 645 (1990) (emphasis in original). In this case, the Board determined that claimant’s condition had changed since her earlier request.

Wampler v. Department of State Police

224 Or. 439 · Oregon Supreme Court · Sep 14, 1960

See, also, State v. Sturgess, 10 Or 58, 62 . … State Highway Commission v. Rawson, 210 Or 593, 611 , 312 P2d 849 (1957); Anthony v. Veatch, 189 Or 462, 502 , 220 P2d 493 , 221 P2d 575 (1950); City of Portland v. Duntley, 185 Or 365, 380 , 203 P2d 640 (1949).