Case law

Oakridge Development Company v. The Property Tax Appeal Board

Appellate Court of Illinois · Nov 15, 2010

However, petitioners by their own admission do not qualify for special treatment under section 10-- 30. … Second, although the legislature removed the recapture provision, it included language that quite clearly indicates an intent that present use and two years' prior use as a farm were both required to qualify property for

Titus v. Mitchell

District Court, S.D. Illinois · Sep 22, 2022

Qualified Immunity Qualified immunity shields “government officials from liability for civil damages insofar as their conduct does not violate clearly established statutory … (2) whether the right at issue was clearly established at the time of the alleged misconduct.

Dockter v. Rudolf Wolff Futures, Inc.

684 F. Supp. 532 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Apr 25, 1988

If an employer subjects a female employee to unwelcome sexual advances, and then, after those advances are rejected, imposes some tangible detriment on the employee, the latter need not establish that she was “qualified for … The evidence presented at trial clearly established that Plaintiff was terminated from her position with Wolff, not because she refused James’ sexual overtures in the first few weeks of her employment, but instead because

People v. Gray

47 Ill. App. 3d 1026 · Appellate Court of Illinois · Apr 14, 1977

Defendant maintains that at most the evidence established that he was present at the scene of an attempted burglary, and then fled, conduct which does not establish his accountability for the crime. … When a witness has been impeached by proof that he has made a prior inconsistent statement, he may bring out all of that prior statement to qualify or explain the inconsistency. (People v.

In re Application of the County Collector

343 Ill. App. 3d 363 · Appellate Court of Illinois · Oct 2, 2003

If a petitioner can meet this basic qualification, he or she can qualify for indemnity in either of two ways. … Clearly, petitioners in this case did not set forth the necessary allegations to establish eligibility for relief under the equitable entitlement provisions; they pleaded neither that they lived in the property nor that it

Hoopingarner v. Stenzel

Appellate Court of Illinois · Apr 15, 2002

Section 2--9 of the Act clearly establishes that an agent will only be liable if the agent acts in bad faith. Therefore, there must be some showing that the agent acted in bad faith. … We agree with the trial court that Hoopingarner failed to present evidence to establish bad faith by Stenzel as required by section 2--9.

Whitfield v. Simpson

312 F. Supp. 889 · District Court, E.D. Illinois · Apr 22, 1970

There has been nothing offered to establish the inadequacy of the hearing. … meaning through established precedents.

People v. Wilson

1 Ill. 2d 178 · Illinois Supreme Court · Sep 24, 1953

Roberson testified on behalf of the defendant and qualified as a specialist in the genitourinary and gynecology field of medicine. … The first ground for reversal asserted by defendant is that the evidence does not establish his guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.

People Ex Rel. Armstrong v. Huggins

407 Ill. 157 · Illinois Supreme Court · Sep 21, 1950

They qualified on July 3, 1947, and assumed the duties of their offices. … This court said, “It is difficult to conceive of an act more clearly unconstitutional than said section 89(g).”

Zych v. Unidentified, Wrecked, and Abandoned Vessel, Believed to Be the SB "Seabird"

811 F. Supp. 1300 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Dec 21, 1992

clearly without.’” … within them or including a thing falling clearly without.

People v. Linda B. (In Re Linda B.)

91 N.E.3d 813 · Illinois Supreme Court · Sep 21, 2017

This exception must be construed narrowly and established by a clear showing of each criterion. Andrew B., 237 Ill. 2d at 347. … In order to establish untimely filing of the May 9 petition, respondent had to establish that her initial period of hospitalization and psychiatric treatment was involuntary.

Pang v. Farmers Insurance Group

2014 IL App (1st) 123204 · Appellate Court of Illinois · Jun 23, 2014

Hoskins’ affidavit supported the motion seeking to establish that the reconstructed policy was an accurate copy of the policy issued to the Chans. … The policy clearly defines “insured” as (1) the named insureds, (2) the named insureds’ relatives by blood, marriage or adoption, or (3) any person under the age of 21 in the care of the named insureds.

Garrett Biblical Institute v. Elmhurst State Bank

331 Ill. 308 · Illinois Supreme Court · Jun 23, 1928

Said trustees shall, however, respectively, hold their office until their successors are elected and qualified. … The whole charter indicates clearly that it was its object to enable the trustees to establish an institution of learning. No one is required to attend the school who does not wish to do so.

People v. Vinson

184 Ill. App. 3d 33 · Appellate Court of Illinois · Jun 8, 1989

This holding is clearly against the manifest weight of the evidence in light of our holding in People v. Bates (1987), 165 Ill. App. 3d 80 , 518 N.E.2d 628 . … Contrary to the trial court’s holding, the State has no obligation to establish a foundation for the admission of test results at a statutory summary suspension hearing unless the motorist first establishes a prima facie

Illinois Joint Stock Land Bank v. Leas

273 Ill. App. 34 · Appellate Court of Illinois · Oct 13, 1933

On October 1, 1932, the court entered an order appointing a receiver, who subsequently filed his bond and qualified. … It was not necessary to show the insolvency of the mortgagors because the mortgage clearly pledged the rents, issues and profits. Rohrer v. Deatherage, 336 Ill. 450 .

Dukes v. N.Y.C. Employees' Ret. Sys.

361 F. Supp. 3d 358 · District Court, S.D. Illinois · Feb 25, 2019

This is not a challenge to an established state procedure. Cf. Marino v. … procedures but are rather claimed instances of the failure to follow established procedures.

People v. Ruback

988 N.E.2d 745 · Appellate Court of Illinois · Apr 22, 2013

Amanda clearly had a motive to lie when she spoke with police. The beginning of the interview therefore does not qualify as an admissible prior consistent statement. … Those statements would have established the context of the statements the State wanted the jury to hear and would have qualified those statements in the context of Amanda’s overall credibility.

Chiplease, Inc. v. Illinois (In Re Resource Technology Corp.)

444 B.R. 401 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Feb 10, 2011

As with subsection (d) above, the legislature could have been relying on section 4 to establish that new requirements would only apply going forward. … Section 8-403.1, as amended, contains no language clearly demonstrating that the legislature intended it to apply retroactively.

Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors of Crystal Medical Products, Inc. v. Houpt (In Re Crystal Medical Products, Inc.)

240 B.R. 290 · United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois · Oct 29, 1999

qualifies for protection from avoidance under § 547(c)(1). … Clearly, paying a supplier of products or services used in the everyday business qualifies as the ordinary course of business of the debtor. The issue is less clear, however, when more unusual situations are involved.

Hamrick v. General Services Administration

107 F. Supp. 3d 910 · District Court, C.D. Illinois · May 22, 2015

On April 28, 2015, this Court entered an Order establishing the documents that are appropriately included in the Administrative Record for review in this case. (See ECF No. 52). … “That is, clearly specify what GSA is trying to accomplish, and why.