Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
2.41s
250 Ill. Dec. 928 · Appellate Court of Illinois · Nov 1, 2000
The trial court granted the motion, finding that Bloom failed to satisfy the requirements to establish fraudulent concealment and that she was legally disabled. … The plaintiffs complaint was dismissed based on her failure to comply with the notice provision of the Local Governmental and Governmental Employees Tort Immunity Act (Tort Immunity Act) (Ill. Rev.
Cited 23 timesPublishedDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · Jul 26, 2022
Salley relies on the general proposition that deliberate indifference to an inmate’s medical need is a clearly established violation of the Eighth Amendment, precluding an application of qualified immunity. … Ct. 548 (2017) (explaining that a plaintiff cannot defeat qualified immunity by defining clearly established law “at a high level of generality”).
Cited 0 timesUnknown224 N.E.3d 831 · Appellate Court of Illinois · Nov 30, 2022
as well to qualify him.’ ” People v. … Defendant’s suggestion that Investigator Merchie’s expert testimony lacked foundation has been clearly rebutted by the record. See Sanders, 2016 IL 118123, ¶ 48.
Cited 14 timesPublishedTice v. American Airlines, Inc.
192 F.R.D. 270 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Apr 19, 2000
sixtieth birthdays, as Flight Officers, American Airlines refused to allow this. 2 In support of its position, American Airlines cites its policies which: 1) require that all cockpit crew members (hired after 1964) must be qualified … Finally, the policy favoring exclusion clearly outweighs Plaintiffs’ need for the information.
Cited 11 timesPublishedColeman v. RETIREMENT BD. FIREMEN'S ANN.
392 Ill. App. 3d 380 · Appellate Court of Illinois · Jun 19, 2009
The Board argues that Bertucci must be applied prospectively because it established a new principle of law. … impression the resolution of which was not clearly foreshadowed.
Cited 3 timesPublishedMcCutcheon v. Zimmer Holdings, Inc.
586 F. Supp. 2d 917 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Aug 6, 2008
qualified as “requirements” under the analysis it had just set forth: In the present case, there is nothing to contradict this normal meaning. … has established federal requirements applicable to the device.
Cited 3 timesPublishedAppellate Court of Illinois · Jul 26, 2000
The State conversely maintains that (1) the circuit court's order was proper, as clear and convincing evidence established by Dr. … We, therefore, decline to apply waiver in this case, since the State's failure to comply with section 3–610 appears on the face of the record and clearly prejudiced George O.
Cited 0 timesPublishedPeople ex rel. Chicago Bar Ass'n v. Czarnecki
268 Ill. 278 · Illinois Supreme Court · Apr 22, 1915
The trouble with this contention is that the evidence clearly shows the alleged payment to Donahue did not relieve the society from liability on the certificate, as is so clearly demonstrated by the case cited by respondent … That it was not an agreed order and that counsel for defendants had no knowledge of such order is also clearly-established by the evidence.
Cited 13 timesPublished288 Ill. App. 3d 1 · Appellate Court of Illinois · Apr 21, 1997
" (5) Finally, defendant's name, Tammy Doneski, is clearly identified. … Clearly, a person not intending to hold herself out as a doctor would not conduct herself in such a manner.
Cited 0 timesPublished188 F. Supp. 91 · District Court, S.D. Illinois · Oct 20, 1960
Upon the facts recited, the court held that the transaction involved was clearly qualified as a tax-exempt reorganization under the statute. … After reciting the facts of the reorganization in some detail, the court said, 269 F.2d at page 465 : “The transaction clearly qualifies as a tax-exempt reorganization under the statute.
Cited 4 timesPublished170 Ill. App. 3d 912 · Appellate Court of Illinois · Apr 22, 1988
Edward Rudzitis was qualified as an expert to testify in rebuttal on behalf of defendant. … The record discloses that that which was sought to be established through Sigler as a witness was ultimately established by a stipulation offered by the defense.
Cited 14 timesPublished336 Ill. App. 3d 867 · Appellate Court of Illinois · Feb 21, 2003
In his appellate brief, respondent acknowledges that the statute clearly requires all minors adjudicated delinquent of certain qualifying offenses to provide blood samples for DNA profiling. … As already noted, the juvenile court systems are creations of the legislature, and the legislature has the authority to establish the procedures governing such systems. See P.H., 145 Ill. 2d at 233 .
Cited 1 timesPublishedCity of Chicago v. Boulevard Bank National Ass'n
Appellate Court of Illinois · Dec 12, 1997
The decision of the trial court is against the manifest weight of the evidence if a review of the record clearly establishes that the decision opposite to the one reached by the trial court was the proper result. … Further, the ordinances applicable to the Blighted Commercial District North Loop clearly put defendants on notice that the Oliver Building could be condemned.
Cited 0 timesPublishedGrimson v. Immigration & Naturalization Service
934 F. Supp. 965 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Jul 1, 1996
The Director determined that plaintiff had failed to present evidence that four years in the NHL as an enforcer qualified as a sustained career. … He clearly states that he is familiar with plaintiff and the other enforcers in the league, and gives a basis for his opinions.
Cited 7 timesPublished771 F. Supp. 928 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Sep 4, 1991
Considerations of sovereign immunity, like considerations of federal supremacy, cannot create a cause of action where none exists under state law. United States v. State of California, 655 F.2d 914, 919 (9th Cir.1980). … The evidence presented by defendants demonstrates that both governmental purchasers qualified for exemptions under 11 500.9a by filing applications pursuant to § 194.1. (Def.’s Submission, Ex. B-3, B-5.)
Cited 2 timesPublished448 Ill. Dec. 818 · Appellate Court of Illinois · Aug 3, 2021
In addition, trial counsel’s clearly preferred trial strategy was to use the testimony of the physicians to attempt to undermine the testimony of both A.H. and K.S. … Clearly, if defense counsel was using the doctors in a similar manner as the State, defense counsel made a decision that was trial strategy to allow both physicians to give those opinions.
Cited 7 timesPublishedDistrict Court, C.D. Illinois · Sep 1, 2026
Therefore, the claims against the Missouri Defendants are hereby dismissed as Plaintiff has not met her burden to establish their minimum contacts with Illinois. … Qualified immunity is applied when the claims against the prosecutors arise from administrative or investigative conduct. Buckley v. Fitzsimmons, 509 U.S. 259, 272-74 (1993).
Cited 0 timesUnknown251 N.E.3d 448 · Appellate Court of Illinois · Dec 29, 2023
Shaw had clearly agreed to plead guilty on those modified terms. The court did not address Mr. … A “bare allegation” is insufficient to establish this. Id. at 458.
Cited 2 timesPublished67 Ill. 404 · Illinois Supreme Court · Jan 15, 1873
Hall, 1 Strange, 416, the principle is clearly recognized. … This was a departure from well established rules.
Cited 7 timesPublishedThies v. State Board of Elections
124 Ill. 2d 317 · Illinois Supreme Court · Sep 22, 1988
The trial court concluded that article VI, section 7(a), of the Illinois Constitution prohibits the election of circuit judges in the manner established by Public Acts 85 — 866 and 85 — 903. … However, it would seem logical that under section 11, if the unit that selects the judge is the circuit, then any person otherwise qualified who lives anywhere in the circuit is qualified.
Cited 14 timesPublished
Ask Donna