Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

FiltersME

9,550 results

8.74s

  • In Re Majestic Motel Associates

    131 B.R. 523 · United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Maine · Sep 20, 1991

    Detroit Trust Co. v. Detroit City Service Co., 262 Mich. 14, 42-43 , 247 N.W. 76, 85 (1933). … Co. v. Brown, 220 Iowa 585, 590 , 262 N.W. 124, 127 (1935) (The phrase “rents, issues and profits” as distinguished from the land itself refers to the products of the land).

    Cited 11 timesPublished
  • Saliem v. Glovsky

    132 Me. 402 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Apr 4, 1934

    Wheeler v. Nichols, 32 Me., 233, 240; Gower v. Stevens, 19 Me., 92; Brown v. Howard, 86 Me., 342, 344, 29 A., 1094 . … Knight v. Herrin, 48 Me., 533.

    Cited 26 timesPublished
  • Parker v. Frazier (In re Freedom Solar Center, Inc.)

    42 B.R. 261 · United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Maine · Sep 5, 1984

    Ulmer v. LimeRock Railroad Co., 57 A. 1001 , 98 Me. 579, 594 (1904); 1 W. Fletcher, Cyclopedia of the Law of Private Corporations § 25 (C. van Swearingen rev. ed. 1983). … Both parties have also complained to the Board of Overseers of the Bar. . "The commencement of a case under 301, 302 or 303 of this title creates an estate.” 11 U.S.C. § 541 .

    Vacated by Parker v. Frazier (In re Freedom Solar Center, Inc.), 49 B.R. 996 (1985)Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Ardolino v. Warden, Maine State Prison

    223 F. Supp. 2d 215 · District Court, D. Maine · Jul 22, 2002

    Brown v. Maloney, 267 F.3d 36, 39-40 (1st Cir.2001). … Brown, 267 F.3d at 40 (citation and internal quotation marks omitted); see also, e.g., Appel v.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Burns v. Town of Lamoine

    43 F. Supp. 2d 63 · District Court, D. Maine · Mar 11, 1999

    See United States v. … See Parratt v.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Piampiano v. Town of Cumberland

    Superior Court of Maine · Apr 29, 2020

    Appellate Review Factual determinations made by a local planning board or board of appeals will only be overturned if they are not adequately supported by evidence in the record. Jordan v. … See MC Associates v. Town of Cape Elizabeth, 2001 ME 89 ,r 16, 773 A.2d 439; Wyer v. Board of Environmental Protection, 2000 ME 45 ,r 1,747 A.2d 192.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Bowditch v. Town of Sebago

    Superior Court of Maine · Aug 29, 2016

    Cf Lindemann v. … See Shores v.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • PARDUE v. SANFORD

    District Court, D. Maine · Jul 8, 2025

    Outside, they were met by Sergeant Brown, who held down Ms. Pardue’s legs so Officer Bilodeau could apply a transport belt.11 Officer Bilodeau and Sergeant Brown also attempted to place Ms. … Pardue show that (1) Defendants Brown and Bilodeau were “deliberately indifferent” to her health or safety and (2) her inadequate care was “objectively, sufficiently serious.” Leavitt v. Corr. Med.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • First Nat. Bank of Boston v. Maine Turnpike Auth.

    153 Me. 131 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Oct 21, 1957

    Detroit v. Detroit Street Ry. 184 U. S. 368, 394 ; Louisville City Ry. v. Louisville, 71 Kentucky, (8 Bush), 534; West River Bridge v. Dix, 6 How. 507, 534 ; Board of Morristown v. East Tenn. Tel. Co., 115 Fed. … Rorick v. Board of Com’rs of Everglades Drainage Dist., 57 F. (2nd) 1048 (Fla.) (1932). P. 1055.

    Cited 32 timesPublished
  • Ziehl Ex Rel. Ziehl v. Maine National Bank

    383 A.2d 1364 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Mar 30, 1978

    See Webb v. … Brown et al., 152 Me. 360, 371-377 , 131 A.2d 191 (1957).

    Cited 13 timesPublished
  • Carlson v. Rice

    817 F. Supp. 193 · District Court, D. Maine · Mar 23, 1993

    In Brown v. … There is only one reported Maine case that explicitly discusses the evidence before the court when it made a decision under the “clear danger” standard of Maine Rule of Civil Procedure 4A(g): Her *195 rick v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Hudson v. 450 Tons of Bituminous Coal

    283 F. 678 · District Court, D. Maine · Oct 1, 1922

    I am satisfied that the master is correct in his finding that the coal remained on board the Atlas when she was taken over by the claimant from the libelants, after the services had been rendered. … S. v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Inhabitants of Topsham v. Purinton

    94 Me. 354 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Oct 31, 1900

    It was properly observed in Cressey v. … But in Inhabitants of Norridgewock v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Barrett v. Lewiston, Brunswick & Bath Street Railway Co.

    104 Me. 479 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Dec 4, 1908

    There was a board that set in the room, some kind of a fixture ; I took it and put it up on the bed and Mr. Barrett signed it and I witnessed it.” … As observed by this court in Valley v. Boston & Maine R. R. Co., 103 Maine, 106.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • In re Wells Fargo Erisa 401(K) Litig.

    331 F. Supp. 3d 868 · District Court, D. Maine · Jul 19, 2018

    See Tussey v. … so would be reasonably likely to damage their relationships within Wells Fargo and on the Board, and thus harm their own careers or their places on the Board." *877 Id. ¶ 317.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Allen v. Cole Realty, Inc.

    325 A.2d 19 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Sep 9, 1974

    O’Brien v. Lashar, 266 F. 215 (CCA 2 1920); Mitchell v. Mason, 4 F.2d 705 (CCA 5 1925); Board of Sup’rs of Rockland County v. Knickerbocker Ice Co., 80 F.2d 248 (CCA 2 1935). See; Daly v. … Board of Sup’rs of Rockland County v. Knickerbocker Ice Co., 80 F. 2d 248 , 250 See also: Daly v. Stratton, supra, 304 F.2d at p. 667 .

    Cited 15 timesPublished
  • Town of Mount Desert v. Smith

    751 A.2d 445 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · May 17, 2000

    . [¶ 4] After the last deadline passed, the Board of Selectmen authorized legal action against Smith for the “autograveyard and junkyard violations.” The Town filed a Land Use Citation and Complaint pursuant to M.R. … See, e.g., Banks v.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • THIBEAULT

    District Court, D. Maine · Jun 24, 2026

    NuVasive, Inc. v. Day, 954 F.3d 439, 443 (1st Cir. 2020) (quoting Nieves-Márquez v. P.R., 353 F.3d 108, 120 (1st Cir. 2003)). “The First two factors are the most important.” Together Emps. v. Mass Gen. … We the People PAC v. Bellows, 512 F. Supp. 3d 74, 77 (D. Me. 2021). V.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • State v. O'Clair

    292 A.2d 186 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jun 14, 1972

    The New York Court, in People v. Brown, supra, n. 5, had this to say about such unavailability of trial testimony: To the same effect, Moore v. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co., Mo.App., 1951, 237 S.W.2d 210, 212 ; Sutter v. … Brown, 1970, 26 N.Y.2d 88 , 308 N.Y.S.2d 825 , 257 N.E.2d 16 ; State v. Leong 1970, 51 Haw. 581 , 465 P.2d 560 ; People v. Moscatello, 1969, 112 Ill.App.2d 16 , 251 N.E.2d 532 ; State v.

    Cited 46 timesPublished
  • Totman-Berube v. Maine Public Employees Retirement Sys.

    Superior Court of Maine · Mar 12, 2015

    See Friends ofMaine's Mountains v. … Baker's Table, Inc. v. City ofPortland, 2000 :ME 7, ~ 9, 743 A.2d 237. In Hale v.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.