Case law

United States v. Philip Morris USA, Inc.

321 F. Supp. 2d 82 · District Court, District of Columbia · May 28, 2004

Greenberg v. FDA, 803 F.2d 1213, 1216 (D.C.Cir.1986). At the summary judgment stage, “the court is not to make credibility determinations or weigh the evidence.” Dunaway v. … See United States v. Philip Morris, 116 F.Supp.2d 131 (D.D.C.2000). 3 .

Local 1325, Retail Clerks International Association, Afl-Cio v. National Labor Relations Board, Adams Drug Company, Inc., Intervenor. National Labor Relations Board v. Adams Drug Company, Inc.

414 F.2d 1194 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jul 2, 1969

Store Union v. NLRB, 128 U.S.App.D.C. at 45, 385 F.2d at 305 11 NLRB v. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co., 380 U.S. at 443, 85 S.Ct. at 1064 12 See Metropolitan Life Ins. Co. v. … NLRB, supra, 327 F.2d 906 ; NLRB v. Frisch's Big Boy Ill-Mar, Inc., 356 F.2d 895 (7th Cir. 1966); NLRB v. Davis Cafeteria, supra, 358 F.2d 98 ; NLRB v.

Industrial Bank of Washington v. Allied Consulting Services

571 A.2d 1166 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Mar 27, 1990

Scott v. District of Columbia, 493 A.2d 319, 323 (D.C.1985). … Our reasoning in Lonon v.

Stella, Marie v. v. Mineta, Norman Y.

284 F.3d 135 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Mar 29, 2002

Id. at 15-17 (citing Brown v. Brody, 199 F.3d 446 (D.C. Cir. 1999)). … Stella v. Mineta, No. 00-5458, Order (May 30, 2001) (citing Brown v. Brody, 199 F.3d at 452-53). II. Discussion A.

Farah Naz v. Chris Wright

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 9, 2026

Brown v. Whole Foods Mkt. Grp., Inc., 789 F.3d 146, 152 (D.C. Cir. 2015) (citing Richardson v. United States, 193 F.3d 545, 548 (D.C. Cir. 1999)). … My colleagues counter with Richardson v. United States, 193 F.3d 545 (D.C. Cir. 1999), and Brown v. Whole Foods Market Group, Inc., 789 F.3d 146 (D.C.

Gulf & Western Industries, Inc. v. United States of America

615 F.2d 527 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Feb 5, 1980

Fisher v. Renegotiation Board, 355 F.Supp. 1171 (D.D.C.1973). The information in question meets the final requirement of exemption 4 in that it is privileged or confidential. … Brown et al., 441 U.S. 281 , 99 S.Ct. 1705 , 60 L.Ed.2d 208 , states “that Congress had not intended the FOIA exemptions be mandatory bars to disclosure.”

Carroll v. Tennessee Valley Authority

697 F. Supp. 508 · District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 7, 1988

In addition, citing Brown v. … . *513 Thus, the dicta in Brown cited by defendants is inapplicable to this case. Finally, defendants maintain that recovery is unavailable under Bush v.

International Union, United Automobile, Aerospace & Agricultural Implement Workers of America v. National Labor Relations Board

449 F.2d 1046 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Mar 19, 1971

See Brown, for and on Behalf of NLRB, v. Pacific Tel. & Tel. Co., 218 F.2d 542, 544 (9th Cir. 1954) (denial of § 10(j) injunction reversed) ; Lebus, for and on Behalf of NLRB v. … See also NLRB v. Heck’s, Inc., 390 F.2d 655 (4th Cir. 1968) (§ 10(e) relief denied because Board’s claim had already been decided adversely to it). .

Abdelkarim v. Tomlinson

605 F. Supp. 2d 116 · District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 20, 2009

In early 2001, the Broadcasting Board of Governors decided to replace the VOA Arabic Service with the Middle East Radio Network (“MERN”), which eventually became known as Radio SAWA. … In Brown v. Tomlinson, 462 F.Supp.2d 16 (D.D.C.2006), this Court found that a complainant who timely elects a hearing before an EEOC administrative judge may withdraw from the hearing and proceed to federal court.

Equitable Paper Bag Co. v. Coe

70 F.2d 735 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Mar 26, 1934

In re Brown, 58 App. D. C. 285, 29 F.(2d) 873 ; Fulton Co. v. Bishop & Babcock Co. (C. C. A.) 17 F.(2d) 1006 . … Oval Wood Dish Co. v. Sandy Creek, N. Y., Wood Mfg. Co. (C. C.) 60 F. 285 . Counsel have cited Dunn Wire-Cut Lug Brick Co. v. Toronto Fire Clay Co. (C. C.

Jennings v. Family Management

201 F.R.D. 272 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 16, 2001

See Alexander v. FBI, 186 F.R.D. at 74 ; FEC v. GOPAC, Inc., 897 F.Supp. 615, 617 (citing Avirgan v. Hull, 118 F.R.D. 252, 254 (D.D.C.1987)). … Cascone v.

Kinard v. Office of Bar Counsel

409 F. App'x 357 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Feb 11, 2011

International Union, United Automobile, Aerospace & Agricultural Implement Workers of America v. National Labor Relations Board

381 F.2d 265 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Mar 3, 1967

In District 50, United Mine Workers v. … And in Puerto Rico Telephone Co. v.

Vanderkam v. Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation

943 F. Supp. 2d 130 · District Court, District of Columbia · May 7, 2013

Brown, 897 F.2d 275 (7th Cir. 1990) 18 (considering lump-sum death benefit); Brandon v. Travelers Ins. … (quoting Brown v. Cont’l Airlines, 647 F.3d 221, 226-27 (5th Cir. 2011))). This, Plaintiffs urge, is not such a circumstance.

Kahn v. Wall

68 A.2d 862 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Oct 20, 1949

Kindleberger, 329 U.S. 803 , 67 S.Ct. 495 , 91 L.Ed. 686 ; The Blanchard Machine Company v. Reconstruction Finance Corporation Adjustment Board, App.D.C.,-F.2d-. … Marcus Brown Holding Co. v. Feldman, 256 U.S. 170 , 41 S.Ct. 465 , 65 L.Ed. 877 .

Oil, Chemical and Atomic Workers International Union, Afl-Cio v. National Labor Relations Board, Tns, Inc., Intervenor

46 F.3d 82 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Apr 24, 1995

Based upon Board precedent and the Supreme Court’s decision in Gateway Coal Co. v. … Normally, the Board’s construction of the Act is subject to deferential review under Chevron U.S.A., Inc. v.

Washington Teachers' Union Local 6 v. District of Columbia Public Schools

77 A.3d 441 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Oct 10, 2013

Brown v. Watts, 993 A.2d 529, 533 (D.C.2010) (alteration in original) (quoting D.C.Code § l-616.52(b)). … King v.

Graphic Arts International Union, Afl-Cio v. National Labor Relations Board, Newspaper Agency Corporation, Intervenor

505 F.2d 335 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Aug 13, 1974

The Photoengravers maintain that the Board’s conclusion that a new unit would arise was unnecessary because, to support the unfair labor violation which the Board found to have occurred, the Board need only have rejected … V Finally, the Photoengravers challenge the measures ordered by the Board to remedy the unfair labor practices committed by the Newspaper.

International Union, United Automobile, Aerospace and Agricultural Implement Workers of America, Uaw v. National Labor Relations Board, the Udylite Corporation v. National Labor Relations Board, National Labor Relations Board v. The Udylite Corporation, International Union, United Automobile, Aerospace and Agricultural Implement Workers of America, Intervenor

455 F.2d 1357 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Dec 17, 1971

P 12,284 INTERNATIONAL UNION, UNITED AUTOMOBILE, AEROSPACE AND AGRICULTURAL IMPLEMENT WORKERS OF AMERICA, UAW, Petitioner, v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Respondent. The UDYLITE CORPORATION, Petitioner, v. … NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Respondent. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Petitioner, v. The UDYLITE CORPORATION, Respondent.

King Electric, Incorporated v. National Labor Relations Board, International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, Local 8, Intervenor

440 F.3d 471 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Mar 7, 2006

The Board has never applied that doctrine, which sometimes justifies an employer’s petition for relief from a continuing obligation to bargain with an incumbent union, see Brooks v. … See Freund Baking Co., 165 F.3d at 931. rv Based on the foregoing, we grant King’s petition for review and deny the Board’s cross-application for enforcement. 1 . See, e.g., Cogburn Health Ctr., Inc. v.