Case law

Mildes

District Court, E.D. Washington · Nov 13, 2025

Kobes recommended that Plaintiff hold 19 off on receiving the COVID-19 vaccine until further studies were released that 20 addressed the immune response, safety, efficacy, or long-term effects on asplenic 21 patients … Where the employee establishes a prima facie case, a rebuttable presumption of 24 discrimination exists. Id.

French

District Court, W.D. Washington · Apr 2, 2026

It also does not indicate whether any Defendants sought to hire a 7 white inmate over qualified inmates of other races. … In order to establish an 14 Eighth Amendment violation, a prisoner must satisfy a two-part test containing both an 15 objective and a subjective component.

Spice v. Internal Revenue Service

District Court, W.D. Washington · May 11, 2020

They also argue that Trustee 8 Budsberg and Budsberg Law have quasi-judicial immunity against the claims here. Id. … law 5 or by a nonfrivolous argument for extending, modifying, or reversing existing law or for 6 establishing new law.”

Ago

Washington Attorney General Reports · Sep 19, 2008

There were no statutory provisions establishing any other general election cycle. … Although the statutes are not explicit on this point, we think they clearly imply that petitions are to be canvassed with respect to the next general election occurring after they are filed.

National Electrical Contractors Ass'n v. Employment Security Department

109 Wash. App. 213 · Court of Appeals of Washington · Nov 19, 2001

First, appellants concede that the former employers, who are all NECA members, “would clearly have standing... as the entity impacted by the incorrect payment of benefits to its former employees.” … We agree with the Commissioner that mere suspicion is insufficient to establish interested party status.

Commonwealth v. Bane

39 Pa. D. & C. 664 · Washington County Court of Quarter Sessions · Nov 25, 1940

This constitutional privilege and immunity protects all persons, whether parties accused in the cause or mere witnesses, from being compelled to give self-incriminating testimony. … This, too, was clearly erroneous, since each day’s violation constituted a distinct offense: Commonwealth v. Bartilson et al., 85 Pa. 482 ; Commonwealth v. Chirico et al., 117 Pa. Superior Ct. 199 ; Commonwealth v.

Dillard v. Washington Public Employees' Retirement System

23 Wash. App. 461 · Court of Appeals of Washington · Jun 6, 1979

Dillard's total incapacity arose from "the tension and strain placed upon her by her work over a period of years” and not as the natural and proximate result of an accident, "clearly erroneous in view of the entire record … Rohila's nonmedical testimony is both competent to establish and did in fact establish a causal connection between some traumatic incidents and Mrs.

Stahl v. Delicor of Puget Sound, Inc.

109 Wash. App. 98 · Court of Appeals of Washington · Nov 13, 2001

Servomation-Ajax Co. 8 for the proposition that vending machine companies cannot qualify as retail establishments. … Further, unlike the Washington Legislature, Congress has not clearly indicated its intent in enacting § 207(i).

Lundy v. Pierce County Sheriff's Department

District Court, W.D. Washington · Feb 27, 2023

Cnty. of Tulare, 666 F.3d 631, 637 (9th Cir. 2012). 26 4 The Pierce County defendants asserted for the first time in reply that they were entitled to qualified immunity. … 28 ORDER GRANTING IN PART THE 1 Baker opened the doors of the cabinet: Jacob’s face and arms were clearly

In re the Personal Restraint of Dalluge

152 Wash. 2d 772 · Washington Supreme Court · Nov 4, 2004

Thus, Dalluge has established that his appellate counsel failed to raise a meritorious issue. See Maxfield, 133 Wn.2d at 344. … The dissent seems to ignore this provision, which clearly requires waiver not only by the parties and their counsel but also by the juvenile court.

Skagit Surveyors v. FRIENDS OF SKAGIT

958 P.2d 962 · Washington Supreme Court · Jun 25, 1998

The County also adopted statutorily required ordinances establishing interim urban growth areas. … Each growth management hearings board consists of three members, each of whom must be qualified by experience or training in matters pertaining to land use planning.

Shirley v. Washington State Department of Fish and Wildlife

District Court, W.D. Washington · Jun 3, 2025

Moreover, it also likely qualifies as a self-authenticating public record. 3 See Fed. R. Evid. 803(8); 902(5). … The OFM guidance also likely qualifies as a 8 self-authenticating public record. See Fed. R. Evid. 803(8); 902(5). 9 17.

Edelman v. STATE EX REL. PUBLIC DISCLOSURE COM'N

68 P.3d 296 · Court of Appeals of Washington · May 13, 2003

One of the initiative's primary purposes was to establish campaign contribution limits and to reduce the influence of large organizational contributors. … When read together with its related statutory subsections, [4] RCW 42.17.660(2) clearly provides that where any sub-unit of a corporation or labor union makes a political campaign contribution, this contribution is considered

John Doe G v. Dep't of Corr.

190 Wash. 2d 185 · Washington Supreme Court · Feb 22, 2018

A SSOSA is a special sentencing alternative that suspends the sentences of qualifying sex offenders. RCW 9.94A.670. … That information is directly related to an offender's health care and thus qualifies as health care information.

Freestone Capital Partners, LP v. MKA Real Estate Opportunity Fund I, LLC

155 Wash. App. 643 · Court of Appeals of Washington · Apr 26, 2010

They include Freestone Low Volatility Qualified Partners LP, Freestone Capital Qualified Partners LP, Freestone Low Volatility Partners LP, and Freestone Capital Partners LP (collectively Freestone). … on the same underlying allegations that we discussed with respect to subject matter jurisdiction. ¶92 A court will give words in a contract their ordinary, usual, and popular meaning unless the entirety of the agreement clearly

State v. Guizzotti

60 Wash. App. 289 · Court of Appeals of Washington · Jan 17, 1991

The trial court admitted the tape, over Guizzotti's objection, concluding that it qualified under the excited utterance exception to the hearsay rule, ER 803(a)(2). The tape was thereafter played for the jury. … Rights conferred by the sixth amendment to the United States Constitution require that a criminal defendant be permitted to adequately cross-examine an essential state witness as to relevant matters which tend to establish

Kim v. Moffett

156 Wash. App. 689 · Court of Appeals of Washington · Jun 29, 2010

But this is mere expectancy or future contingent interest and, thus, is insufficient to qualify Rim as a real party in interest. … Although those minutes list the Strykowski Limited Partnership along with Kim as the “applicant/owner,” Kim is clearly referred to in the minutes as the “owner” of the property.

Brower v. State

969 P.2d 42 · Washington Supreme Court · Dec 24, 1998

Brower does not argue that a different analysis applies under the state privileges and immunities clause than applies under the Equal Protection Clause. … The election provisions were clearly encompassed within the title.

Seaway Properties, LLC v. Fireman's Fund Insurance

16 F. Supp. 3d 1240 · District Court, W.D. Washington · Apr 22, 2014

limitations on one who qualifies as an additional insured via the portion of the clause that precedes the phrase. … Rather, the accident in question clearly arose out of [the lessor's own failure to maintain the pathway from the parking lot to the employee entrance.

State v. Nava

177 Wash. App. 272 · Court of Appeals of Washington · Oct 22, 2013

Now, that affects whether or not she has — she’s telling us now that it may affect her ability to have all the events clearly laid out. … Both women sometimes characterized themselves as having been truthful, and neither ever clearly recanted what they had said.