Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
0.82s
Williams v. Sears, Roebuck and Co.
143 F. Supp. 2d 941 · District Court, W.D. Tennessee · May 31, 2001
See, e.g., Baldwin County Welcome Ctr. v. Brown, 466 U.S. at 150 , 104 S.Ct. 1723 ; Anooya v. Hilton Hotels Corp., 733 F.2d 48, 49 (7th Cir.1984); Wilson v. … Irwin v. Dept. of Veterans Affairs, 498 U.S. at 95-96 , 111 S.Ct. 453 ; Baldwin County Welcome Ctr. v. Brown, 466 U.S. at 151-52 , 104 S.Ct. 1723 .
Cited 9 timesPublishedFederated Insurance Co. v. Lethcoe
18 S.W.3d 621 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Apr 3, 2000
See Underwood v. Zurich Ins. Co., 854 S.W.2d 94, 97 (Tenn. 1993). … To support its position, Federated relies on this Court’s decision in Brown v. Consolidation Coal Co., 518 S.W.2d 234 (Tenn. 1974).
Cited 77 timesPublishedIn Re Estate of Eloise J. Storey
Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Mar 5, 2018
Wright v. Wright, 337 S.W.3d 166, 176 (Tenn. 2011) (citing Kline v. Eyrich, 69 S.W.3d 197, 203 (Tenn. 2002); Shamblin v. Sylvester, 304 S.W.3d 320, 332 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2005)). … Corp of Tenn., Inc. v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedState of Tennessee v. Rachel Kay Bond
Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · Aug 31, 2016
He could not lift the victim so took a board from the shed and tried to slide the victim onto the board and then into the truck. He described the “board” as “an old door or something.” … State v. Brown, 836 S.W.2d 530, 540-41 (Tenn. 1992). The existence of premeditation is a question of fact for the jury to determine and may be inferred from the circumstances surrounding the offense. State v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedState of Tennessee v. Amilcar Crabeal Butler
Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · Nov 14, 2016
On appeal, the Petitioner asserts that the trial court’s dismissal was improper because the trial court relied on State v. Brown, 479 S.W.3d 200 (Tenn. 2015), which the Petitioner argues was wrongly decided. … Brown does not allow a petitioner to seek relief for an expired sentence under Tennessee Rule of Criminal Procedure 36.1. See Brown, 479 S.W.3d at 211.
Cited 0 timesPublishedCapitol Airways, Inc. v. Airline Pilots Ass'n International
237 F. Supp. 373 · District Court, M.D. Tennessee · Oct 18, 1963
The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals in Operating Engineers Union Local No. 3 v. … In reaching its conclusion the Court cited United Steelworkers of America v.
Cited 3 timesPublishedState National Bank v. City of Memphis
116 Tenn. 641 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Apr 15, 1906
School, etc., 42 Pa., 21 ; Louisville v. Comw., 61 Ky., 63 ; E. & W. Const. Co. v. Jasper Co., 117 Iowa, 365, 372 , 90 N. W., 1006 , 94 Am. St. Rep., 301 , and authorities cited in note to Board of Com’rs v. … (State v. Board of Assessors, p. 651), such was the rule laid down in Louisiana. Morrison v. Larkin, 26 La. Ann., 699 ; Lefranc v. City of New Orleans, 27 La. Ann., 188 ; City of N. C. v. Bank of Lafayette, 27 La.
Cited 17 timesPublishedMerriman v. Coca Cola Bottling Co.
17 Tenn. App. 433 · Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Jul 29, 1933
In Perkins v. Brown, 132 Tenn. 294 , 177 S.W. 1158 , 1160, L.R.A., 1915F, 723, Ann. … The cases of Perkins v. Brown, Gray v.
Cited 22 timesPublishedPinkham, Timothy W. v. Davis Enterprises of Tennessee, LLC
2026 TN WC 16 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · Feb 26, 2026
Code Ann. § 50-6-239(d)(1) (2025); McCord v. Advantage Human Resourcing, 2015 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS 6, at *7-8, 9 (Mar. 27, 2015);. The threshold issue is whether Mr. … The Court Clerk will prepare the record for submission to the Appeals Board, and you will receive notice once it has been submitted.
Cited 0 timesPublished534 S.W.2d 309 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Mar 1, 1976
Adverse interest of board members and justices prohibited. — No member of the local board of education or of the quarterly county court shall take or make, as the adverse party, any contract which his board is competent to … Boles v.
Cited 2 timesPublished48 F. Supp. 9 · District Court, M.D. Tennessee · Sep 1, 1942
They are taken back to the warehouse and there sorted and all brown bottles placed in one case and all clear bottles placed in another and then loaded on the defendants’ trucks and returned to the breweries. … Until the War Production Board banned the use of cans as beer containers a short time ago, about ninety (90%) per cent of the beer obtained from Milwaukee was contained in cans rather than bottles, and also a small percentage
Cited 2 timesPublishedMiles, DeAndre v. Nike Inc. Footwear
2025 TN WC App. 46 · Tennessee Workers' Compensation Appeals Board · Sep 16, 2025
TENNESSEE BUREAU OF WORKERS’ COMPENSATION WORKERS’ COMPENSATION APPEALS BOARD DeAndre Miles Docket No. 2023-08-8556 v. … Sneed v. Bd. of Prof’l Responsibility of the Sup. Ct. of Tenn., 301 S.W.3d 603, 615 (Tenn. 2010).
Cited 0 timesPublishedCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · Jan 26, 1998
State v. Brown, 836 S.W.2d 530, 541 (Tenn. 1992). The evidence is certainly sufficient to support the intentional and premeditated attempt to kill the victim. … Rule 10(b); State v. Turner, 919 S.W.2d 346, 358 (Tenn. Crim. App. 1995); State v. Hill, 875 S.W.2d 278, 283-84 (Tenn. Crim. App. 1993); State v. Killebrew, 760 S.W.2d 228, 231 (Tenn. Crim. App. 1988); see also Tenn.
Cited 0 timesPublishedTennessee Supreme Court · Aug 16, 2021
Justice’s discovery requests, the Board pointed out that section 24.3 of pre-2014 Rule 9 did not authorize discovery. The Board also relied on Moncier v. … Walwyn v. Bd. of Prof’l Resp., 481 S.W.3d 151, 165 (Tenn. 2015) (quoting West v. Schofield, 460 S.W.3d 113, 120 (Tenn. 2015)).
Cited 0 timesPublishedJohn F. Johnson v. Tennessee Department of Correction
Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Dec 22, 2010
Scope of Review The disciplinary board’s action is reviewed through the common-law writ of certiorari. Rhoden v. State Dep’t of Corr., 984 S.W.2d 955 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1998). … DINKINS, JUDGE 3 As noted in Wolff v.
Cited 0 timesPublished2017 TN WC 93 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · May 22, 2017
In considering the above factors, the Appeals Board held in Thompsen v. Concrete Solutions, 2015 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. … In deciding this issue, the Court notes the following discussion of the Appeals Board in Willis v. All Staff, 2015 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd.
Cited 0 timesPublishedBriceno, Tonja v. Resource Manufacturing, et. al
2016 TN WC App. 58 · Tennessee Workers' Compensation Appeals Board · Nov 4, 2016
TENNESSEE BUREAU OF WORKERS’ COMPENSATION WORKERS’ COMPENSATION APPEALS BOARD Tonja Briceno ) Docket No. 2016-05-0386 ) v. … Sirkin v. Trans Carriers, Inc., No. 2015-08-0292, 2016 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS 22, at *8-9 (Tenn. Workers’ Comp. App. Bd.
Cited 0 timesPublishedColonial Pipeline Co. v. Morgan
231 F.R.D. 518 · District Court, M.D. Tennessee · Nov 10, 2005
See id.; FTC v. … See also Wilson v.
Cited 3 timesPublished661 S.W.2d 88 · Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Oct 14, 1983
Fiddler’s Inn, Inc. v. Andrews Distribution Co., 612 S.W.2d 166 (Tenn.App.1980). … In our opinion, the case of Parham v. Hardaway, 555 F.2d 139 (6th Cir.1977) is dispositive of this issue.
Cited 2 timesPublishedJimmy L. Hensley v. Cocke Farmers Cooperative
Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Aug 31, 2015
Farmers-Peoples Bank v. … The co-op cites Guiliano v.
Cited 0 timesPublished
Ask Donna