Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

FiltersTN

10,000+ results

0.82s

  • Williams v. Sears, Roebuck and Co.

    143 F. Supp. 2d 941 · District Court, W.D. Tennessee · May 31, 2001

    See, e.g., Baldwin County Welcome Ctr. v. Brown, 466 U.S. at 150 , 104 S.Ct. 1723 ; Anooya v. Hilton Hotels Corp., 733 F.2d 48, 49 (7th Cir.1984); Wilson v. … Irwin v. Dept. of Veterans Affairs, 498 U.S. at 95-96 , 111 S.Ct. 453 ; Baldwin County Welcome Ctr. v. Brown, 466 U.S. at 151-52 , 104 S.Ct. 1723 .

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • Federated Insurance Co. v. Lethcoe

    18 S.W.3d 621 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Apr 3, 2000

    See Underwood v. Zurich Ins. Co., 854 S.W.2d 94, 97 (Tenn. 1993). … To support its position, Federated relies on this Court’s decision in Brown v. Consolidation Coal Co., 518 S.W.2d 234 (Tenn. 1974).

    Cited 77 timesPublished
  • In Re Estate of Eloise J. Storey

    Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Mar 5, 2018

    Wright v. Wright, 337 S.W.3d 166, 176 (Tenn. 2011) (citing Kline v. Eyrich, 69 S.W.3d 197, 203 (Tenn. 2002); Shamblin v. Sylvester, 304 S.W.3d 320, 332 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2005)). … Corp of Tenn., Inc. v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • State of Tennessee v. Rachel Kay Bond

    Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · Aug 31, 2016

    He could not lift the victim so took a board from the shed and tried to slide the victim onto the board and then into the truck. He described the “board” as “an old door or something.” … State v. Brown, 836 S.W.2d 530, 540-41 (Tenn. 1992). The existence of premeditation is a question of fact for the jury to determine and may be inferred from the circumstances surrounding the offense. State v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • State of Tennessee v. Amilcar Crabeal Butler

    Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · Nov 14, 2016

    On appeal, the Petitioner asserts that the trial court’s dismissal was improper because the trial court relied on State v. Brown, 479 S.W.3d 200 (Tenn. 2015), which the Petitioner argues was wrongly decided. … Brown does not allow a petitioner to seek relief for an expired sentence under Tennessee Rule of Criminal Procedure 36.1. See Brown, 479 S.W.3d at 211.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Capitol Airways, Inc. v. Airline Pilots Ass'n International

    237 F. Supp. 373 · District Court, M.D. Tennessee · Oct 18, 1963

    The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals in Operating Engineers Union Local No. 3 v. … In reaching its conclusion the Court cited United Steelworkers of America v.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • State National Bank v. City of Memphis

    116 Tenn. 641 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Apr 15, 1906

    School, etc., 42 Pa., 21 ; Louisville v. Comw., 61 Ky., 63 ; E. & W. Const. Co. v. Jasper Co., 117 Iowa, 365, 372 , 90 N. W., 1006 , 94 Am. St. Rep., 301 , and authorities cited in note to Board of Com’rs v. … (State v. Board of Assessors, p. 651), such was the rule laid down in Louisiana. Morrison v. Larkin, 26 La. Ann., 699 ; Lefranc v. City of New Orleans, 27 La. Ann., 188 ; City of N. C. v. Bank of Lafayette, 27 La.

    Cited 17 timesPublished
  • Merriman v. Coca Cola Bottling Co.

    17 Tenn. App. 433 · Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Jul 29, 1933

    In Perkins v. Brown, 132 Tenn. 294 , 177 S.W. 1158 , 1160, L.R.A., 1915F, 723, Ann. … The cases of Perkins v. Brown, Gray v.

    Cited 22 timesPublished
  • Pinkham, Timothy W. v. Davis Enterprises of Tennessee, LLC

    2026 TN WC 16 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · Feb 26, 2026

    Code Ann. § 50-6-239(d)(1) (2025); McCord v. Advantage Human Resourcing, 2015 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS 6, at *7-8, 9 (Mar. 27, 2015);. The threshold issue is whether Mr. … The Court Clerk will prepare the record for submission to the Appeals Board, and you will receive notice once it has been submitted.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • State v. Kidd

    534 S.W.2d 309 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Mar 1, 1976

    Adverse interest of board members and justices prohibited. — No member of the local board of education or of the quarterly county court shall take or make, as the adverse party, any contract which his board is competent to … Boles v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Walling v. Sanders

    48 F. Supp. 9 · District Court, M.D. Tennessee · Sep 1, 1942

    They are taken back to the warehouse and there sorted and all brown bottles placed in one case and all clear bottles placed in another and then loaded on the defendants’ trucks and returned to the breweries. … Until the War Production Board banned the use of cans as beer containers a short time ago, about ninety (90%) per cent of the beer obtained from Milwaukee was contained in cans rather than bottles, and also a small percentage

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Miles, DeAndre v. Nike Inc. Footwear

    2025 TN WC App. 46 · Tennessee Workers' Compensation Appeals Board · Sep 16, 2025

    TENNESSEE BUREAU OF WORKERS’ COMPENSATION WORKERS’ COMPENSATION APPEALS BOARD DeAndre Miles Docket No. 2023-08-8556 v. … Sneed v. Bd. of Prof’l Responsibility of the Sup. Ct. of Tenn., 301 S.W.3d 603, 615 (Tenn. 2010).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • State v. Brian Lautenschlager

    Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · Jan 26, 1998

    State v. Brown, 836 S.W.2d 530, 541 (Tenn. 1992). The evidence is certainly sufficient to support the intentional and premeditated attempt to kill the victim. … Rule 10(b); State v. Turner, 919 S.W.2d 346, 358 (Tenn. Crim. App. 1995); State v. Hill, 875 S.W.2d 278, 283-84 (Tenn. Crim. App. 1993); State v. Killebrew, 760 S.W.2d 228, 231 (Tenn. Crim. App. 1988); see also Tenn.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • In Re: Loring Edwin Justice

    Tennessee Supreme Court · Aug 16, 2021

    Justice’s discovery requests, the Board pointed out that section 24.3 of pre-2014 Rule 9 did not authorize discovery. The Board also relied on Moncier v. … Walwyn v. Bd. of Prof’l Resp., 481 S.W.3d 151, 165 (Tenn. 2015) (quoting West v. Schofield, 460 S.W.3d 113, 120 (Tenn. 2015)).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • John F. Johnson v. Tennessee Department of Correction

    Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Dec 22, 2010

    Scope of Review The disciplinary board’s action is reviewed through the common-law writ of certiorari. Rhoden v. State Dep’t of Corr., 984 S.W.2d 955 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1998). … DINKINS, JUDGE 3 As noted in Wolff v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Kleeburg, Monica v. Profit Line Services, Russell Floersheim/United Resource Group, Environmental Solutions Systems, Embassy Suites/Certistaff

    2017 TN WC 93 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · May 22, 2017

    In considering the above factors, the Appeals Board held in Thompsen v. Concrete Solutions, 2015 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. … In deciding this issue, the Court notes the following discussion of the Appeals Board in Willis v. All Staff, 2015 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Briceno, Tonja v. Resource Manufacturing, et. al

    2016 TN WC App. 58 · Tennessee Workers' Compensation Appeals Board · Nov 4, 2016

    TENNESSEE BUREAU OF WORKERS’ COMPENSATION WORKERS’ COMPENSATION APPEALS BOARD Tonja Briceno ) Docket No. 2016-05-0386 ) v. … Sirkin v. Trans Carriers, Inc., No. 2015-08-0292, 2016 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS 22, at *8-9 (Tenn. Workers’ Comp. App. Bd.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Colonial Pipeline Co. v. Morgan

    231 F.R.D. 518 · District Court, M.D. Tennessee · Nov 10, 2005

    See id.; FTC v. … See also Wilson v.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Robertson v. McElrath

    661 S.W.2d 88 · Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Oct 14, 1983

    Fiddler’s Inn, Inc. v. Andrews Distribution Co., 612 S.W.2d 166 (Tenn.App.1980). … In our opinion, the case of Parham v. Hardaway, 555 F.2d 139 (6th Cir.1977) is dispositive of this issue.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Jimmy L. Hensley v. Cocke Farmers Cooperative

    Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Aug 31, 2015

    Farmers-Peoples Bank v. … The co-op cites Guiliano v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.