Case law

Democratic Nat'l Comm. v. Russian Fed'n

392 F. Supp. 3d 410 · District Court, S.D. Illinois · Jul 30, 2019

Therefore, the DNC has not established closed-ended continuity. 30 2. … Hacking a computer network may qualify as trespass to chattels. Id. A "computer network" may qualify as a chattel because "computers ... are tangible personal property." Id.

Hinsdale Golf Club v. Kochanski

197 Ill. App. 3d 634 · Appellate Court of Illinois · May 3, 1990

Further, the Board’s argument that the phrase “offering exhibitions to the public” qualifies the listed examples in section 3.25 is without merit. … We read the same phrase as only qualifying certain organized sporting events.

People v. Rodriguez

249 N.E.3d 564 · Appellate Court of Illinois · Apr 30, 2024

The defense argued that, if the ongoing investigation established probable cause to bring murder charges, pretrial detention could be reconsidered, but the current charges did not support such detention. … The defendant here was clearly charged with a qualifying offense under section 110-6.1(a)(6)(O)(ii) of the Code, and we reject his argument that the first time weapon offense program changed the nonprobationable nature

Andruss v. City of Evanston

68 Ill. 2d 215 · Illinois Supreme Court · Oct 5, 1977

Here the General Assembly clearly determined that the State had the exclusive power to regulate the licensing of real estate brokers and salesmen. … or limited the first one, but the intermediate act will be deemed to remain in force and to qualify or modify the new act in the same manner as it did the first.” 17 Ill. 2d 550, 555-56 .

In Re Marriage of Morreale

351 Ill. App. 3d 238 · Appellate Court of Illinois · Jul 16, 2004

In such event, any balance due and owing will be paid into a trust to be established by MARY ELLEN for the benefit of the parties’ children. … Mary Ellen argues that the agreement clearly shows that the payments are a property settlement and, therefore, are not income for tax purposes.

In Re Marriage of Hillinger

146 Ill. App. 3d 549 · Appellate Court of Illinois · May 1, 1986

B Clearly, the question becomes one of determining when exactly the final order was entered in this case. … Clearly, Gwendolyn’s motion does not specify any of the first four forms of relief enumerated in the statute.

Lipman v. Board of Review

123 Ill. App. 3d 176 · Appellate Court of Illinois · Mar 30, 1984

We believe that the Board’s interpretation of Regulation 17F is clearly erroneous. … Even apart from the fact that virtually no one could qualify under the Board’s interpretation since, as counsel for the Board admitted at oral argument, most people are aware of the Act, the Board’s interpretation is too

People v. Atul R.

382 Ill. App. 3d 1164 · Appellate Court of Illinois · Jun 13, 2008

Accordingly, we conclude that respondent clearly established the criteria necessary to satisfy the public-interest exception to the mootness doctrine. … In the absence of any restrictive language in the statute, we believe respondent’s criminal defense attorney qualifies as a party to whom notice is due.

Anderson v. Schneider

67 Ill. 2d 165 · Illinois Supreme Court · Jun 1, 1977

It does not appear unreasonable that a group purporting to form a new political party be required to determine that its candidates are qualified to run for the offices they seek. … To thus flout the legislative intent so clearly demonstrated by the explicit statutory provisions is violative of the established rules for the construction of statutes.

Barton v. Chicago & North Western Transportation Co.

Appellate Court of Illinois · Sep 14, 2001

established by the [RTA] pursuant to Section 2.04 of this Agreement. … Defendants claim that Barton's expert was not qualified. (footnote: 14) Defendants cite Jones v.

Taylor v. Cox

153 Ill. 220 · Illinois Supreme Court · Oct 30, 1894

It is suggested that this instruction should have been so qualified as to hold that the power of a testator to dispose of his estate by will is subject to the payment of his debts. … This instruction was clearly erroneous, and was properly refused.

Carter v. Azaran

Appellate Court of Illinois · Jul 22, 2002

Defendant argues that the questions posed, in conjunction with the stipulated medical records, clearly demonstrate that the purpose of the questioning was to establish that, even after receiving adequate treatment of his … Because defendant failed to lay a foundation establishing either that Dr.

Bettis v. Marsaglia

2014 IL 117050 · Illinois Supreme Court · Jan 26, 2015

However, the court found that the case qualified for review under the public interest exception to the mootness doctrine. 2013 IL App (4th) 130145, ¶¶ 10-11. … . ¶ 10 We hold that petitioner’s issue and one of the two cross-appeal issues qualify for resolution under the public interest exception.

Christopoulos v. Trout

343 F. Supp. 3d 812 · District Court, E.D. Illinois · Sep 24, 2018

The party seeking summary judgment has the burden of establishing that there is no genuine dispute as to any material fact. See Celotex Corp. v. … The rule requires the party seeking to delay consideration of a summary judgment motion to establish that "it cannot present facts essential to justify its opposition." Fed. R. Civ. P. 56(d).

Georgouses v. NaTec Resources, Inc.

963 F. Supp. 728 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · May 20, 1997

Clearly, the majority of the relevant documentary evidence will be located in Houston, the majority of potential witnesses are in or around Houston, and two of the three individual defendants are residents of Texas. … It is clearly settled, however, that when transferring the action under Section 1404(a), the transferor court is not first required to establish personal jurisdiction. See The Coats Company, Inc. v.

Martin v. Discount Smoke Shop, Inc.

443 F. Supp. 2d 981 · District Court, C.D. Illinois · Jul 5, 2006

Therefore, this court concludes that an assessment of Plaintiffs level of academic functioning clearly constitutes an “expert opinion.” … Plaintiff has not shown that either Ellington or Lewiekyj was qualified to make this assessment.

People v. Pagliara

47 Ill. App. 3d 708 · Appellate Court of Illinois · Mar 29, 1977

The analysis was duly performed by a qualified expert chemist who replaced the substance in its plastic container, resealed and stapled the bag, and placed it in another plastic bag which he sealed by means of a heating machine … A review of the record clearly indicates that the State established a proper foundation for the introduction into evidence of the contraband by describing a continuous chain of possession in elaborate detail.

Chaney v. Yetter Manufacturing Co.

Appellate Court of Illinois · Aug 16, 2000

Clearly, Genie qualifies as a "loaning employer" under the Act. The issue in this case is whether Chaney's status as a loaned employee was properly decided as a matter of law. … By designating temporary employment agencies as "loaning employ ers," the Act merely establishes another party from whom the employee can seek workers' compensation recovery. 820 ILCS 305/1(a)(4) (West 1996) (establishing

Martinez v. Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Railway Co.

276 F. Supp. 2d 920 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Aug 19, 2003

8 , as discussed supra, the record clearly establishes (and Defendant admits) that Defendant negligently violated FRA safety regulations which caused, certainly in part, Plaintiffs injury. 9 Moreover, Defendant’s own report … Defendant admits that a “root cause” of the accident was the fact that Soto was not qualified to serve as a lookout.

In re Barclays Liquidity Cross & High Frequency Trading Litig.

390 F. Supp. 3d 432 · District Court, S.D. Illinois · May 28, 2019

The Exchanges argue that Plaintiffs fail to establish several of the foregoing elements. … Although it is a close question, Plaintiffs here satisfy the standard established in John .