Case law

Green v. Crescent Amusement Co.

32 Tenn. App. 554 · Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Jul 30, 1949

“In Bejach v. Colby, 141 Tenn. 686, 693 , 214 S. … In Brown v. Brown, 16 Tenn. App. 230 , 64 S.

Johnson v. City of Jackson

42 Tenn. App. 296 · Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Jun 21, 1956

East Tennessee, V. & G. R. Co. v. City of Morristown, Tenn. Ch. App., 35 S. W. 771 . … Smith v. City of Chattanooga, 176 Tenn. 642 , 144 S.

Evans, Antron v. Family Dollar Stores, Inc.

2022 TN WC 66 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · Sep 2, 2022

Instead, the Court is fettered with the obligation to deem controlling only the opinions of higher tribunals such as the Appeals Board. See Palmer v. Hardy, 2017 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. … In Eaves v. Ametek, Inc., 2018 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd.

Switchmen's Union of North America v. Clinchfield Railroad

310 F. Supp. 606 · District Court, E.D. Tennessee · May 7, 1969

United Steelworkers of America v. American Mfg. … . * * *” Switchmen’s Union of North America v. National Mediation Board (1943), 320 U.S. 297, 302 , 64 S. Ct. 95, 98 , 88 L.Ed. 61, 65 (headnote 5).

State Ex Rel. Pike v. Hammons

163 Tenn. 290 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Nov 14, 1931

Curry v. Wright, 57 Tenn. (10 Heisk.), 237, cited with approval in Maloney v. Collier, 112 Tenn., 78, 99 . In State ex rel. Curry v. … In the latter case it was assumed that the certificate of the canvassing board constituted the returns behind which inquiry may not be made in such a proceeding. In State ex rel. Gann v.

Freytag v. Crass

913 S.W.2d 171 · Court of Appeals of Tennessee · May 19, 1995

In Jamison v. … In Brady v.

M. F. Parsley & Co. v. Cole & Miller

1 Tenn. App. 714 · Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Mar 13, 1926

The buildings were duly accepted by the board and the board paid into Dr. Woodward’s hands the sum of $3,785.91, which was the balance of the contract prices of both buildings. … These sections have been under consideration by the Supreme Court in Hope v. Hamilton County, 17 Pickle, 325; Madison County v. Alexander, 8 Cates, 687 ; City of Knoxville v. Christenberry, 147 Tenn., 286 .

Rowell v. Dutton

688 S.W.2d 474 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · Jan 9, 1985

Adams v. Russell, 179 Tenn. 428 , 167 S.W.2d 5, 6 (1942). . [3-6] The power of the Governor to pardon, after conviction, is constitutional power. Article 3, § 6, Tennessee Constitution. … Bedford v. McCorkle, 163 Tenn. 101 , 40 S.W.2d 1015, 1016 (1931). The power resides in the Governor and can be exercised without reference to the Board of Paroles or anyone else. Smith v.

Ballentine v. Mayor of Pulaski

83 Tenn. 633 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Dec 15, 1885

Marr v. Enloe, 1 Yer., 454 ; Keesee v. District Board, 6 Cold., 127 ; Waterhouse v. Board, etc., 8 Heis., 857; Lipscomb v. Dean, 1 Lea, 546 . … Read, 13 Grat., 78; Kuhn v. Board of Education, 4 West Virginia, 499; State v. Sickles, 24 New Jersey, 135; Marks v. University, 37 Indiana, 155; Vanover v. Justices, 27 Georgia, 354.

Coe v. Bogart

377 F. Supp. 310 · District Court, E.D. Tennessee · Apr 3, 1974

The right of plaintiff to a due process hearing before a transfer is governed in this instance by Board of Regents v. Roth, 408 U.S. 564 , 92 S.Ct. 2701 , 33 L.Ed.2d 548 (1972), and Perry v. … State v. Yoakum, 201 Tenn. 180 , 297 S.W.2d 635 ; State ex rel. Taylor v. Rasnake, 209 Tenn. 229 , 352 S.W.2d 427 ; Blair et al v. Mayo, et al., 224 Tenn. 108 , 450 S.W.2d 582 . In State ex rel. Pemberton v.

Davis v. Barr

373 F. Supp. 740 · District Court, E.D. Tennessee · Nov 12, 1973

Board of Regents v. Roth, supra; Perry v. Sindermann, supra; Goldberg v. Kelly, 397 U.S. 254 , 90 S.Ct. 1011 , 25 L.Ed.2d 287 (1970); Slochower v. … (Board of Regents v. Roth, supra; Perry v. Sindermann, supra ; Orr v. Thorpe, 427 F.2d 1129 (5th Cir. 1970); Bennett v. Gravelle, 323 F.Supp. 203 (D.Md.1971)).

King, Joshua v. Compass Heating and Air, Inc.

2016 TN WC App. 64 · Tennessee Workers' Compensation Appeals Board · Nov 22, 2016

TENNESSEE BUREAU OF WORKERS’ COMPENSATION WORKERS’ COMPENSATION APPEALS BOARD Joshua T. … Davidson, III, delivered the opinion of the Appeals Board in which Judge David F. Hensley and Judge Timothy W. Conner joined.

State of Tennessee v. Gregory L. Allen a/k/a Michael Taylor

Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · Nov 30, 2016

Davis v. State, 313 S.W.3d 751, 759 (Tenn. 2010). … Webb v. Nashville Area Habitat for Humanity, Inc., 346 S.W.3d 422, 430 (Tenn. 2011) (quoting Morris v. Grusin, No. W2009-00033-COA-R3- CV, 2009 WL 4931324, at *4 (Tenn. Ct. App.

Stout v. Whiteaker

379 F. Supp. 218 · District Court, M.D. Tennessee · Jun 28, 1974

On the basis of the recent Supreme Court holdings in Board of Regents v. Roth, 408 U.S. 564 , 92 S.Ct. 2701 , 33 L.Ed,2d 548 (1972) and Perry v. … Board of Regents v. Roth, supra, at 573 .

State of Tennessee v. Douglas McArthur Wilson

Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · May 7, 2018

Several other people lived at the Brown residence, including Stetson Brown, Erica Brown, Larry Stump, and Trisha Brown. … The reviewing court should not overturn that decision absent an abuse of discretion State v. Brown, 53 S.W.3d 264, 284 (Tenn. Crim. App. 2000).

State v. Curtis Lee Majors

Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · Jul 30, 1997

See State v. Brown, 795 S.W.2d 689, 694 (Tenn. Crim. App. 1990). Five factors are to be 1 Tenn. Code Ann. § 39-13-402. 2 Tenn. Code Ann. § 39-13-102. … Brown, 795 S.W.2d at 694. A showup is a form of identification of a defendant that is inherently suggestive.

Headley, Harry v. Roadstar, LLC

2024 TN WC 60 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · Aug 22, 2024

However, in Berdnik v. Fairfield Glade Community Club, 2017 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS 32, at *16 (May 18, 2017), the Appeals Board reversed the trial court’s order to authorize a panel. … LEXIS 53, at *10 (Sept. 12, 2017), the Board held the employer must submit a new panel if the original authorized doctor refused to treat the employee. In Baker v. Electrolux, 2017 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd.

Boyd v. Tennessee State University

848 F. Supp. 111 · District Court, M.D. Tennessee · Mar 24, 1994

See Kompara v. Board of Regents of the State Univ., 548 F.Supp. 587, 542 (M.D.Tenn.1982) (determining immunity from suit pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1988 ). … From the scant facts of the opinion, it appears that the utilities board' is not an entity to which sovereign immunily may possibly apply. See also Eason v.

City of Rockwood v. C., N. O. & T. P. Ry. Co.

160 Tenn. 31 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Dec 9, 1929

In Arnold v. … When the act in question was passed, and the proceeding’s herein were had before the Board of Commissioners, the case of City of Alcoa v. L. & N. R.

Black, James v. Prestige Group, LLC

2016 TN WC 161 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · Jul 15, 2016

.: 2015-06-0423 Employee, ) v. ) State File Number: 75113-2014 Prestige Group, LLC ) Employer. … After the workers' compensation judge approves the record and the Court Clerk transmits it to the Workers' Compensation Appeals Board, the appeal will be docketed and assigned to an Appeals Board judge for review