Opinion

King, Joshua v. Compass Heating and Air, Inc.

  • 2016 TN WC App. 64
Court
Tennessee Workers' Compensation Appeals Board
Filed
Nov 22, 2016
Status
Published
On the bench
Marshall L. Davidson III, David F. Hensley, Timothy W. Conner
Cited by
0 cases

The opinion

TENNESSEE BUREAU OF WORKERS’ COMPENSATION

WORKERS’ COMPENSATION APPEALS BOARD

Joshua T. King ) Docket No. 2015-03-0886

)

v. ) State File No. 95439-2015

)

Compass Heating and Air, et al. )

)

)

Appeal from the Court of Workers’ )

Compensation Claims )

Pamela B. Johnson, Judge )

Affirmed and Remanded—Filed November 22, 2016

This interlocutory appeal involves an HVAC installer who alleges suffering a hernia

while he was assisting in the installation of an air conditioning unit in the attic of an

unfinished house. The employer denied the claim, taking the position that the employee

could not establish a compensable injury. Following an expedited hearing, the trial court

found the employee was likely to succeed at trial and awarded medical benefits in the

form of a panel of physicians. The trial court also awarded temporary partial disability

benefits. The employer has appealed the award of temporary partial disability benefits.

We affirm the trial court’s decision and remand the case.

Presiding Judge Marshall L. Davidson, III, delivered the opinion of the Appeals Board in

which Judge David F. Hensley and Judge Timothy W. Conner joined.

Joseph Ballard, Atlanta, Georgia, for the employer-appellant, Compass Heating and Air

Martin Ellis, Knoxville, Tennessee, for the employee-appellee, Joshua T. King

1

Memorandum Opinion1

Joshua King (“Employee”), an HVAC installer, alleges suffering a hernia arising

out of and occurring in the course of his employment with Compass Heating and Air

(“Employer”). Employee was assisting in the installation of an air conditioning unit that

weighed approximately two hundred pounds and, upon maneuvering the unit into the

attic of a house under construction, felt a sharp pain followed by the appearance of a

bulge in his groin. He informed Employer of the injury, sought emergency medical care

within a few days of the injury, and was diagnosed with an acute inguinal hernia.

Employee has received no treatment for his injury other than his initial visit to the

emergency room and a visit to a walk-in clinic where Employer sent him.

It is undisputed that the emergency room physician who treated Employee placed

him on lifting restrictions. Employee testified that when he contacted Employer about his

restrictions, he was told there was no light duty work available for him. Employer did

not refute this testimony. Employee has not returned to work for Employer since the date

of his injury. He did, however, work for a period of time washing dishes at a restaurant,

though he did not provide specific dates of that employment.

After conducting an expedited hearing, the trial court concluded that Employee

was likely to prevail at trial and ordered Employer to provide medical benefits in the

form of a panel of physicians. The trial court also awarded temporary partial disability

benefits from the last day Employee worked for Employer to the present and ongoing,

taking into consideration the time he worked in the restaurant for another employer. On

appeal, Employer disputes only the portion of the trial court’s order requiring it to pay

temporary partial disability benefits.2

An injured worker is eligible for temporary disability benefits if (1) the worker

became disabled from working due to a compensable injury, (2) there is a causal

connection between the injury and the inability to work, and (3) the worker established

the duration of the period of disability. James v. Landair Transp., Inc., No. 2015-02-

0024, 2015 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS 28, at *16 (Tenn. Workers’ Comp. App.

Bd. Aug. 26, 2015). Temporary partial disability benefits may be awarded when the

temporary disability resulting from a work-related injury is not total, and such entitlement

exists for the “time, if any, during which the injured employee is able to resume some

1

“The Appeals Board may, in an effort to secure a just and speedy determination of matters on appeal and

with the concurrence of all judges, decide an appeal by an abbreviated order or by memorandum opinion,

whichever the Appeals Board deems appropriate, in cases that are not legally and/or factually novel or

complex.” Appeals Bd. Prac. & Proc. § 1.3.

2

Because neither party has raised on appeal the issue of the trial court’s award of medical benefits, we

need not address that portion of the court’s order or discuss the proof pertinent to that issue.

2

gainful employment but has not reached maximum recovery.” Williams v. Saturn Corp.,

No. M2004-01215-WC-R3-CV, 2005 Tenn. LEXIS 1032, at *6 (Tenn. Workers’ Comp.

Panel Nov. 15, 2005).

As noted, the trial court awarded temporary partial disability benefits from the last

day Employee worked to the present and ongoing, “taking into consideration his brief

period of employment” in the restaurant. Employer contends that the trial court’s award

was error because Employee did not provide the specific dates he worked at the

restaurant. Employee attempts to address this argument by attaching to his brief a

document purporting to show the dates of that employment.

There are two problems with Employee’s belated effort to supply the dates he

worked at the restaurant. First, just as an assertion of fact in a party’s brief may not be

considered as evidence on appeal, Rezba v. Rezba, No. M2014-00553-COA-R3-CV,

2015 Tenn. App. LEXIS 7, at *7 (Tenn. Ct. App. Jan. 7, 2015), documents not included

in the record attached to a brief will not be considered by courts on appeal, State v.

Anderson, No. W2008-00188-CCA-R3-CD, 2010 Tenn. Crim. App. LEXIS 306, at *56-

57 (Tenn. Crim. App. Apr. 9, 2010). Second, as we have noted many times,

“[e]valuating a trial court’s decision on appeal necessarily entails taking into account

information the trial court had before it at the time the issues were decided by the court,

as opposed to the potentially open-ended universe of information parties may seek to

present on appeal following an adverse decision.” Hadzic v. Averitt Express, No. 2014-

02-0064, 2015 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS 14, at *13 n.4 (Tenn. Workers’ Comp.

App. Bd. May 18, 2015). Accordingly, “we will not consider on appeal testimony,

exhibits, or other materials that were not properly admitted into evidence at the hearing

before the trial judge.” Id.

Although we have disregarded the information attached to Employee’s brief

because it is not part of the record, Employer’s argument that the trial court erred in

awarding temporary disability benefits is unpersuasive. The trial court ordered Employer

to pay such benefits from the last day Employee worked for Employer to the present and

ongoing, acknowledging there exists a period of time during which Employee was

working for another employer that must be taken into consideration. It is undisputed that

Employee worked for the other employer, and we agree with the trial court’s implicit

finding it is likely he can establish the dates of that employment at trial in the event the

parties cannot agree on those dates and the wages received during those dates.

We hold that the evidence does not preponderate against the trial court’s decision

at this interlocutory stage of the case. Nor does the trial court’s decision violate any of

the standards set forth in Tennessee Code Annotated section 50-6-217(a)(3).

Accordingly, the trial court’s decision is affirmed, and the case is remanded for any

further proceedings that may be necessary.

3

TENNESSEE BUREAU OF WORKERS’ COMPENSATION

WORKERS’ COMPENSATION APPEALS BOARD

Joshua T. King ) Docket No. 2015-03-0886

)

v. ) State File No. 95439-2015

)

Compass Heating and Air, et al. )

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that a true and correct copy of the Appeals Board’s decision in the

referenced case was sent to the following recipients by the following methods of service

on this the 22nd day of November, 2016.

Name Certified First Class Via Fax Via Email Address

Mail Mail Fax Number Email

Martin Ellis X mellis@ellisandellislaw.com

Joseph W. Ballard X joseph.ballard@thehartford.com

Pamela B. Johnson, X Via Electronic Mail

Judge

Kenneth M. Switzer, X Via Electronic Mail

Chief Judge

Penny Shrum, Clerk, X Penny.Patterson-Shrum@tn.gov

Court of Workers’

Compensation Claims

Matthew Salyer

Clerk, Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board

220 French Landing Dr., Ste. 1-B

Nashville, TN 37243

Telephone: 615-253-1606

Electronic Mail: Matthew.Salyer@tn.gov

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.