Case law

Engineering Dynamics, Inc. v. Rudman & Winchell, LLC

Superior Court of Maine · Feb 18, 2020

Pawlendzjo v. Haddow, 2016 ME 144, if 10, 148 A.3d 713. … The Board had every reason to be skeptical of Mr. Goslin e's assessment-ratio study when it was based on faulty inputs. Cf Tetjloth v.

Inhabitants of Wells v. County Commissioners

79 Me. 522 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Nov 29, 1887

Harkness v. Co. Com. 26 Maine, 353; Windham v. Co. Com. 26 Maine, 406, 410; King v. Lewiston, 70 Maine, 406; Acton v. Co. Com. 77 Maine, 128. 2. … To be sure, it does not contain the words " county commissioners,” and hence does not in direct, express terms, authorize that board eo nomine to make the location, as the Spec.

State v. Bennett-Roberson

206 A.3d 303 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Apr 4, 2019

State v. … Hill , 606 A.2d at 795 (quoting Brown v. Texas , 443 U.S. 47 , 51, 99 S.Ct. 2637 , 61 L.Ed.2d 357 (1979) ).

Copp v. Town of Gray

Superior Court of Maine · Jun 7, 2023

LaMarre v. Town ofChina, 2021 ME 45, ,r 6,259 A.3d 764 (citing Mills v. Town of Eliot, 2008 ME 134, ,r 19, 955 A.2d 258); see ct/so 29 McKown LLC v. Town of Boothbay Harbor, 2022 ME 38, ,r 11,277 A.3d 364. … Mills v. Town ofEliot, 2008 ME 134, ~ 13,955 A.2d 258 (quoting Yates v. Town ofSouthwest Harbor, 2001 ME 2, ~ 10, 763 A.2d 1168).

Wendell Strout Jr. v. Central Maine Medical Center

94 A.3d 786 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jun 10, 2014

But see Greaton v. … Greenstreet v. Brown, 623 A.2d 1270, 1272 (Me. 1993) (quotation marks omitted).

State v. Wellman

83 Me. 282 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Apr 6, 1891

Hallock v. Franklin, 2 Met. 559 . … Millelt v. County Commissioners, 80 Maine, 429.

Efstathiou v. Aspinquid, Inc.

956 A.2d 110 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Sep 23, 2008

Brown v. Brown, 2007 ME 89, ¶ 11 , 929 A.2d 476, 480 . [1149] The court determined Merrill’s current earning capacity and considered that her earning potential would soon increase. … Torrey v. Torrey, 415 A.2d 1092, 1094-95 (Me.1980). 9. Attorney Fees [¶ 66] We review a court’s decision regarding attorney fees for an abuse of discretion. Brown v. Habrle, 2008 ME 17, 18 , 940 A.2d 1091, 1096 .

Inhabitants of Palmyra v. Waverly Woolen Co.

99 Me. 134 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jul 9, 1904

National Fibre Board Company v. Lewiston & Auburn Electric Light Company, 95 Maine, 318, 321. … China v. Southwick, 12 Maine, 238; Smith v. Agawam Candi Co., 2 Allen, 355.

Maine Central Railroad v. Department of Transportation

863 A.2d 278 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jan 4, 2005

We discern nothing about the decision showing the Board to have exceeded its authority. … grounds of the town’s denial of a liquor license application, resulting in a dismissal of the town’s appeal from the Liquor Commission decision); see also Storer v.

Seven Islands Land Co. v. Maine Land Use Regulation Commission

450 A.2d 475 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Sep 17, 1982

Pride’s Corner Concerned Citizens Association v. Westbrook Board of Zoning Appeals, Me., 398 A.2d 415, 418 (1979); Matter of Lappie, Me., 377 A.2d 441, 443 (1977). … See generally State v.

Houseal v. City of Portland

Superior Court of Maine · Jun 30, 2023

3, € 33, 153 A.3d 113 (citing Kelley v. … See Tominsky v.

Cooper v. Maine Dep't of Environmental Protection

Superior Court of Maine · Feb 8, 2022

Stein v. M'a.ine Criminal Justice Academy, 20141vffi 82, <[ 11. 15. When the under igned reviews an ag ncy's fa tual findings, this Court cannot substitute its judgment for that of tbe Board. Duffy v. … AFSCME Council 93 v. Maine Labor Relations Board, 678 A.2d 591, 593 (Me. 1996); Nelson v.

Midland Funding LLC v. Mark Walton

155 A.3d 864 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Feb 2, 2017

Windham Land Trust v. Jeffords, 2009 ME 29, ¶ 19, 967 A.2d 690. “If the District Court lacked subject matter jurisdiction, we would have to vacate its order.” Landmark Realty v. … Express Bank FSB v.

Gatley v. United Parcel Service, Inc.

662 F. Supp. 200 · District Court, D. Maine · Jun 12, 1987

v. … Emery-Waterhouse Co. v.

Sawyer v. Congress Square Hotel Co.

157 Me. 111 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Mar 13, 1961

The defendant presented its counterclaim for its itemized and unpaid charges against the plaintiff for room, board and telephone service. The defendant moved for a summary judgment pursuant to Rule 56, M. R. C. … Jur., Innkeepers, § 52; Neely v. Lott Hotels Co., 334 Ill. App. 91 , 78 N. E. (2nd) 659; Raider v. Dixie Inn, 198 Ky. 152 , 248 S. W. 229 ; Morningstar v. Lafayette Hotel Co., 211 N. Y. 465 , 105 N. E. 656 .

State v. Beck

156 Me. 403 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Oct 4, 1960

State v. Huff, 89 Me. 521 . R. … We quote from Rabinowitz v.

Raposa v. The Inhabitants of the Town of York

Superior Court of Maine · Dec 3, 2018

See, e.g., Mills v. … Gensheimer v.

Seavey v. Heckler

594 F. Supp. 587 · District Court, D. Maine · Sep 28, 1984

Booth, M.D., a board-certified orthopedic surgeon, found that Plaintiff suffered from “resistant, ongoing, pes anserine bursitis.” In recommending surgical excision, Dr. … Greene, M.D., a board-certified orthopedic surgeon, noted that Plaintiff walks with a left leg limp.

Clapp v. Cumberland County Power & Light Co.

121 Me. 356 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jun 8, 1922

The plaintiff’s case is thus stated in the declaration: “that as said plaintiff was on the running board and was stepping from said car to the street, while said car was at a standstill, said car suddenly and without warning … McKinnon v. Ry., 117 Maine, 239. The case having been fully tried, without surprise, so far as the record shows, to the defendant, we think that an amendment may be considered as made, Wyman v.

DOE v. MISSIONARY OBLATES OF MARY IMMACULATE EASTERN PROVINCE

District Court, D. Maine · Jan 7, 2025

Brown v. Delta Tau Delta, 2015 ME 75, ¶ 9, 118 A.3d 789, 791. … In Brown v.