Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
4.37s
2024 OK CR 28 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Oct 17, 2024
Brown v. Illinois , 422 U.S. 590, 599 (1975). The U.S. … McDaniel v. Brown , 558 U.S. 120, 130-31 (2010).
Cited 3 timesPublishedJC FAB, INC. v. STATE ex rel. OKLAHOMA EMPLOYMENT SECURITY COMMISSION
350 P.3d 181 · Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · Apr 27, 2015
OSCN Found Document:JC FAB, INC. v. STATE ex rel. … ASSESSMENT BOARD Discussed 2008 OK CIV APP 80, 194 P.3d 771, SNIDER BROS., L.L.C. v. STATE ex rel.
Cited 0 timesPublished183 Okla. 141 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 14, 1938
Plaintiff contends the board acted arbitrarily, capriciously, and in utter disregard of undisputed evidence, and that no disqualifying evidence existed. Paragraph 2 of the syllabus in Boyle v. … the entire matter to an arbitrary declaration of the board.
Cited 9 timesPublishedHawley v. Board of Trustees for the Oklahoma County Criminal Justice Authority
District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Jul 21, 2025
CIV-25-151-SLP ) BOARD OF TRUSTEES FOR THE ) OKLAHOMA COUNTY CRIMINAL ) … P. 41(b); Nasious v. Two Unknown B.I.C.E. Agents at Arapahoe Cty.
Cited 0 timesUnknownMedicine Lodge Investments, L.L.C. v. Ear, Inc.
197 P.3d 502 · Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · Aug 15, 2008
Brown v. Alliance Real Estate Group, 1999 OK 7 , 976 P.2d 1043, 1045 . Summary judgment is not *508 proper where reasonable minds could draw different inferences or conclusions from the undisputed facts. Id. … See Henley v.
Cited 3 timesPublishedTown of Gans v. Cookson Hills Electric Cooperative, Inc.
288 P.2d 707 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 11, 1955
In this connection, see Tobin v. O’Brieter, 16 Okl. 500 , 85 P. 1121 ; 3 Am.Jur., “Appeal and Error”, sec. 965; 32 C.J.S., Evidence, § 779, and Priddy-Maer Elevator Co. v. … WILLIAMS, V. C. J., and WELCH, CORN, HALLEY and JACKSON, JJ., concur.
Cited 6 timesPublishedSouthern Drilling Co. v. McKee
171 Okla. 409 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 5, 1935
Choctaw Electric Co. v. Clark, 28 Okla. 399 , 114 P. 730 ; Prickett v. Sulzberger & Sons, 57 Okla. 567 , 157 P. 356 . … Co. v. Bennett, 36 Okla. 358 , 128 P. 705 ; Choctaw Electric Co. v. Clark, 28 Okla. 399 , 114 P. 730 ; Prickett v. Sulzberger & Sons, 57 Okla. 567 , 157 P. 356 ; St. L. & S. F. Ry. Co. v.
Cited 10 timesPublished2022 OK 14 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 8, 2022
OSCN Found Document:OWENS v. ZUMWALT OWENS v. … Brown v. Okla. Secondary Sch. Activities Ass'n , 2005 OK 88 , ¶ 11, 125 P.3d 1219, 1225 .
Cited 13 timesPublished62 O.B.A.J. 3005 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 8, 1991
Comm. of the City of Tulsa v. Gresham, 653 P.2d 920 (Okla.1982). In White, the City of Tulsa appealed from a district court ruling which affirmed and modified a decision of the Tulsa Civil Service Commission. … In holding that Grayson was to be accorded permanent status as a Lieutenant, the Merit Board relied upon an earlier unpublished opinion by the Court of Appeals titled Kucera and Acevedo v.
Cited 8 timesPublishedBattles v. State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Commission for Crippled Children
206 Okla. 444 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 20, 1951
Co. v. Excise Board of Washington County, 168 Okla. 619 , 35 P. 2d 274 . … Co. v.
Cited 12 timesPublished324 P.3d 425 · Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · Dec 19, 2013
For this argument, Mayor relies on Development Industries, Inc. v. … Mayor also relies on City of Muskogee v.
Cited 2 timesPublished3 Okla. 106 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 7, 1895
(Cooley on Taxation, page 12; Amenia v. Stanford, 6 Johns. 92 ; Judd v. Driver, 1 Kan. 455 .) And this rule .is as applicable to licenses as to taxes. In the case of Blake v. … (Brown v. Woods, 2 Okla. Rep. 601; Sutherland on Stat. Const. §324.)
Cited 6 timesPublishedState v. Prairie Cotton Oil Co.
180 Okla. 608 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 14, 1937
The assessments here were not arbitrary assessments, as was the circumstance in the Rorabaugh-Brown Case, supra. This question of assessing excess value was dealt with in State v. … Earlsboro Gas Co. v. Brown Drilling Co., 175 Okla. 320 , 52 P. (2d) 730 . Aside from the fact that it has a trade-name in which it may sue or be sued, it has no rights under the law that an individual does not possess.
Cited 3 timesPublishedMiller v. Oklahoma County Criminal Justice Authority
District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Aug 12, 2025
Comm’rs v. Brown, 520 U.S. 397, 404 (1997). Rather, “[t]he plaintiff must also demonstrate that, through its deliberate conduct, the municipality was the ‘moving force’ behind the injury alleged.” Id. … Brown, 520 U.S. at 405. For the third element, Miller must plausibly allege that the Board and OCCJA acted with deliberate indifference.
Cited 0 timesUnknown525 P.2d 1359 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Aug 13, 1974
In Synnott v. State, Okl.Cr., 515 P.2d 1154 (1973), this Court held that the power delegated by 47 O.S.1971, § 759, was primarily administrative and was a proper matter for delegation for the Legislature. … On April 23, 1973, the Board adopted the rules and regulations pursuant to 47 O.S. *1361 1971, § 759 which superseded and replaced rules adopted by the Board in August, 1969.
Cited 28 timesPublishedLincoln Income Life Insurance Co. v. Wood
556 P.2d 602 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 12, 1976
Oklahoma Water Resources Board v. Central Oklahoma Master Conservancy District, 464 P.2d 748, 756 (Okl.1969); Simms v. Hobbs, 411 P.2d 503 (Okl.1966). 2 . National Indian Youth Council v. … Oklahoma Water Resources Board v. Central Oklahoma Master Conservancy District, 464 P.2d 748, 756 (1969) citing Fry v. Wolfe, 106 Okl. 289 , 234 P. 191 (1924); Shelby-Downard Asphalt Co. v.
Cited 10 timesPublished740 P.2d 1201 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Jul 29, 1987
Relying on Crandell , this Court held in Brown v. State, 550 P.2d 963, 968 (Okl.Cr.1976), that: “The notice provisions are mandatory. … Appellant’s reliance on Stokes v.
Cited 5 timesPublished317 P.2d 200 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 24, 1957
In Ellison v. … In Pinson v.
Cited 5 timesPublished108 Okla. 123 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 3, 1925
Stat. 1921, that before any money can be paid out by blie district school boards, there must be a written contract ‘‘approved by such county superintendent existing between such district board and such teachers' to be paid … Champlin v. Carter, 78 Okla. 300 , 190 Pac. 679 ; Lovett v. Lankford, 47 Okla. 12 , 145 Pac. 767 .
Cited 9 timesPublishedInternational Brotherhood of Teamsters General Fund v. Fleming Companies, Inc.
70 O.B.A.J. 464 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jan 26, 1999
Comm’n v. First Nat’l Bank of Texhoma, 197 Okla. 652 , 174 P.2d 259 (1946); State ex rel. Oklahoma Employment Sec. Comm’n v. Tulsa Flower Exch., 192 Okla. 293 , 135 P.2d 46 (1943); Sumner Coal-Mining Co. v. … Wachsler, Inc., v.
Cited 5 timesPublished
Ask Donna