Case law

Riggs v. Polk County

51 Or. 509 · Oregon Supreme Court · Apr 14, 1908

RIGGS v. POLK COUNTY. [95 Pac. 5.] Corporations — Members — Meetings — Calling Meetings — Persons Making Call. 1. … school board.

Standley v. State Accident Insurance Fund

8 Or. App. 429 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Mar 16, 1972

In Lemons v. … Defendant relies on Peterson v.

Gould v. Deschutes County

322 Or. App. 340 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Oct 12, 2022

See Coast Range Conifers v. Board of Forestry, 339 Or 136, 148-49, 117 P3d 990 (2005). 346 Gould v. … Rather, this case involved nothing more than a run-of-the-mill application of the county board of commis- sioners’ interpretation of the county’s rule in Clough. 350 Gould v.

Wantowski v. Crown Cork & Seal

175 Or. App. 609 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Aug 8, 2001

After the Board issued its decision, the Supreme Court established a different test for determining whether an injured worker’s compensable condition actually worsened. See SAIF v. … Consequently, we are unable to adequately review the Board’s conclusion that no objective evidence supported claimant’s aggravation claim. Iles v. Fred Meyer, Inc., 173 Or App 254 , 21 P3d 195 (2001).

Johnston v. Gordon Trucking - Heartland Express

305 Or. App. 531 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jul 15, 2020

Lowells v. SAIF, 285 Or App 161, 164, 396 P3d 241 (2017). Cf. Franke v. … Harris v.

State v. Morgan

116 Or. App. 338 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Feb 23, 1993

See ORS 137.669; State v. Moeller, 105 Or App 434 , 806 P2d 130 , rev dismissed 312 Or 76 , 815 P2d 701 *343 (1991) ; see also State v. Little, 116 Or App 322 , 842 P2d 414 (1992) . … See State v. Haydon, supra, 116 Or App at 353-54.

Phillips v. Graves

139 Or. 336 · Oregon Supreme Court · Nov 19, 1931

As early as 1870 this court in Brown v. Harper, 4 Or. 89 , pointed out that the authorities treated the right to assert and perfect a mechanic’s lien as a privilege personal to the mechanic and not transferable. … Brown, Belt, Campbell and Kelly, JJ., concur.

Cooper v. Thomason

30 Or. 161 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jun 15, 1896

Where one party has done acts in part execution or upon the faith of the contract, with the knowledge and consent of the other, this will take the case out of the statute: Brown v. Lord, 7 Or. 302 ; Plymale v. … Good, 3 Watts & S. 56 ; Waterman’s Specific Performance of Contracts, § 15; Browne on the Statute of Frauds, § 471. -The deed to Cooper transferred the legal title which drew after it the possession (Swift v.

State Ex Rel. Gilmore v. Cupp

1 Or. App. 22 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jul 7, 1969

In this proceeding the parole board heard no witnesses nor did it . offer Gilmore the opportunity of calling witnesses. The Oregon Supreme Court in Whalen v. … Anderson v. Alexander, supra, at 430-31. The burden of proof of arbitrariness is on the person whose parole is revoked. Anderson v. Alexander, supra, at 440.

Pena v. Travelers Ins. Co. (In re Pena)

294 Or. App. 740 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Nov 7, 2018

See Don't Waste Oregon Com. v. … See Smith v. Veterinary Medical Examining Board , 175 Or.

State v. Victoroff

96 Or. App. 176 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Apr 12, 1989

He argues that it exceeds the court’s authority in the light of State v. Brown, 297 Or 404 , 687 P2d 751 (1984). See also State v. Lyon, 304 Or 221 , 744 P2d 231 (1987). … The evidentiary holdings oí Brown and Lyon are irrelevant.

Parker v. Norton

143 Or. 165 · Oregon Supreme Court · Apr 5, 1933

See Brennecke v. Ganahl Lumber Co. (Mo.), 44 S. W. (2d) 627 ; State ex rel. Brown v. Trimble, 324 Mo. 353 ( 23 S. W. (2d) 162 ); *172 Robinson v. Meek, 203 Iowa 185 ( 210 N. W. 762 ). … In Walker v. Ginsburg, 244 Mich. 568 ( 222 N. W. 192 ), plaintiff was injured by falling from a box while attempting to pry off a board by the use of a wrecking *175 bar.

Crowder v. Alumaflex

163 Or. App. 143 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Sep 29, 1999

Drews v. EBI Companies, 310 Or 134, 141 , 795 P2d 531 (1990). … Claimant also had assigned error to the Board’s conclusion that it did not have jurisdiction over his claim for vocational assistance, but he withdrew that claim in light of Sweisberger v.

Capps v. Mines Service, Inc.

175 Or. 248 · Oregon Supreme Court · Oct 11, 1944

Berry, 8 How. 544 , quoted with approval in Coulter v. Portland Trust Co., 20 Or. 469, 481 , 26 P. 565 , 27 P. 266 . To the same effect see Brown v. Laird, 134 Or. 150, 156 , 291 P. 352 , 73 A. L. R. 877; Freeman v. … Brown v. Laird, supra, 134 Or. at p. 160 , and cases there cited. It follows that the decree of the circuit court was right, and it is affirmed.

Astoria Plywood Co. v. Culp

115 Or. App. 737 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Oct 21, 1992

Perez v. State Farm Mutual Ins. Co., 289 Or 295, 299 , 613 P2d 32 (1980); see City of Portland v. Smith, 314 Or 178, 186 , 838 P2d 568 (1992). … In Armstrong v.

Vawter v. Rogue River Valley Canning Co.

124 Or. 94 · Oregon Supreme Court · Apr 20, 1928

As a general rule a corporation can act only through its board of directors at a regularly called meeting. The corporation ordinarily speaks through its records. In Doernbecher v. C. C. L. … J., and Bean and Brown, JJ., concur.

SAIF Corp. v. Terleski

240 Or. App. 378 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jan 12, 2011

Marvin Wood Products v. Callow, 171 Or App 175, 183-84 , 14 P3d 686 (2000). … See Shubert v.

Inkley v. Forest Fiber Products Co.

288 Or. 337 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jan 22, 1980

The Workers’ Compensation Board (WCB) held, however, that neither the employer nor SAIF is liable, and the Court of Appeals affirmed without opinion. Inkley v. … The Court of Appeals in Gronquist v.

Multnomah Cty. v. Mult. Cty. Corrections Deputy Assn.

317 Or. App. 89 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jan 20, 2022

Board (board). … B. v.

State v. Turner

34 Or. 173 · Oregon Supreme Court · Dec 5, 1898

the tow : Wilson v. … In Chapman v. Jackson, 9 Rich.