Case law

Rosenblum v. John Does 1-10

District Court, D. Oregon · Jul 24, 2020

The category of interests that qualify as “quasi-sovereign” is relatively broad. … In both instances of a federal seizure it is either admitted or clearly visible that the agents’ uniforms say “Police.”

Grammer v. Commissioner Social Security Administration

District Court, D. Oregon · Dec 5, 2023

It is unlikely that this question alone qualifies as a challenge to the VE’s numbers. … Therefore, Plaintiff provides no basis to conclude the alternative job numbers qualify as significant probative evidence that the ALJ must address. See Tobeler v.

DePaul Industries v. City of Eugene

District Court, D. Oregon · Aug 27, 2020

As such, they meet the statutory definition of a Qualified Rehabilitation Facility (“QRF”). See ORS § 279.835(6). … To prevail on a procedural due process claim, Plaintiff must establish: “(1) a liberty or property interest protected by the Constitution; (2) a deprivation of the interest by the government; [and] (3) lack of process.”

Northwest Airlines, Inc. v. Department of Revenue

325 Or. 530 · Oregon Supreme Court · Aug 7, 1997

Further, the auditors made the lump sum adjustments, some of which were substantial, based solely upon their judgment, as opposed to following any established procedure. … Weil, President, Roosevelt University) (local assessors try to keep assessments down in order to keep taxes low and to help local school districts qualify for financial assistance).

Cramer

District Court, D. Oregon · Apr 10, 2026

Plaintiff does not cite Paragraph 75, but that paragraph makes the Court’s point on this issue clearly. … The elements of a prima facie disparate treatment claim are, “(1) [plaintiff] is a member of a protected class; (2) [plaintiff] was qualified for [the] position; (3) [plaintiff] experienced an adverse employment action;

Cline v. PeaceHealth

District Court, D. Oregon · Jan 24, 2025

Defendant established a committee to review religious exemption requests and began processing such requests. Le Decl. ¶ 18. … Defendant then established a committee to review religious exemption requests and began processing such requests. Le Decl. ¶ 18.

Kaufmann v. Department of Revenue, State of Oregon

Oregon Tax Court · May 8, 2013

Certain other less common exceptions not here relevant are also included in that statute, including an exemption for qualified individuals with a tax home in a foreign country as provided in IRC § 911(d)(1), per ORS 316.027 … there until the person establishes a new domicile.”

Strawn v. Farmers Insurance

353 Or. 210 · Oregon Supreme Court · Feb 22, 2013

Strawn, as the party seeking an award of fees, has the burden of establishing the reasonableness of the fee amount that he requests. Hillsboro v. Maint. & Const. … On that issue, Strawn asserts that about 40 percent of the fees sought in the main petition qualify for the fee-shifting award against Farmers, while 60 percent of those fees qualify for the award from the common fund.

Gibson v. Community Development Partners (CDP)

District Court, D. Oregon · Oct 18, 2022

Nor does it immunize a pro se litigant from complying with Rule 8(a)(2) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, which “does not require ‘detailed factual allegations,’” but does demand more than “‘labels and conclusions … To establish an FHA discrimination claim, a plaintiff can rely on three theories: (1) disparate treatment, (2) disparate impact, or (3) failure to make reasonable accommodations for handicapped housing. Gamble v.

East Valley Water v. Water Resources Commission

374 Or. 148 · Oregon Supreme Court · Aug 7, 2025

The term “beneficial use” is not specifically defined by statute, but qualifying beneficial uses include domestic use, municipal water supply, irrigation, power development, industrial use, mining, recreation, conservation … That concept is reflected most clearly in ORS 540.610(1), which provides that “beneficial use” is the “basis, the measure and the limit of all rights to use of water” in the state.

Parsons v. PeaceHealth

District Court, D. Oregon · Dec 4, 2024

Defendant established a committee to review religious exemption requests and began processing such requests. Le Decl. ¶ 18. … Defendant then established a committee to review religious exemption requests and began processing such requests. Le Decl. ¶ 18.

Vesta Corporation v. Dept. of Rev.

Oregon Tax Court · Jun 19, 2015

Defendant stated in its Motion to Strike Plaintiff’s Post-Trial Memorandum and Attachments (Defendant’s Motion) that Plaintiff’s witness Uriarte “did not state that it was an ‘established practice’ in the payments industry … Henney defined direct costs as “closely tied and clearly linked to an activity * * * revenue generator” and indirect costs are “costs a company incurs no matter what, e.g. pencils, paper, telephone services, whether revenue

In Re Myers

147 B.R. 221 · United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Oregon · Nov 13, 1992

Mandatory indemnification has also developed because of the lack of insurance and the practical consequences of failing to reimburse directors for the defense costs of unfounded lawsuits, namely, that few qualified people … Thus, the basis for the EOUST’s decision was clearly erroneous.

Chrisman v. Cherisman

16 Or. 127 · Oregon Supreme Court · Mar 9, 1888

On the twenty-fourth day of June, 1885, the said will was duly admitted to probate in common form, and' the executors thereof having duly qualified, entered upon the discharge of their duties in administering the estate. … "Whiteaker as tending to establish smile dementia.

Anderson

District Court, D. Oregon · Feb 2, 2026

. § 2254(d)(1) (authorizing de novo federal habeas review of a state court decision if the decision is “contrary to” or “an unreasonable application of” clearly established federal law); id. § 2244(d)(l)(A) (establishing … Rodriguez, 411 U.S. 475, 500 (1973). 3 Parole supervision typically qualifies as “custody” under § 2254. Comstock v.

Parker v. PeaceHealth

District Court, D. Oregon · Dec 5, 2024

Defendant established a committee to review religious exemption requests and began processing such requests. Le Decl. ¶ 18. … Defendant then established a committee to review religious exemption requests and began processing such requests. Le Decl. ¶ 18.

Goff v. PeaceHealth

District Court, D. Oregon · Dec 4, 2024

Defendant established a committee to review religious exemption requests and began processing such requests. Le Decl. ¶ 18. … Defendant then established a committee to review religious exemption requests and began processing such requests. Le Decl. ¶ 18.

Hansen v. Department of Revenue, Tc-Md 081122d (or.tax 9-29-2009)

Oregon Tax Court · Sep 29, 2009

The parties agree that the home had nine occupants in 2005, but disagree as to the number of occupants that qualify for business expense deductions. … Thus, the court will allow $632 which is the clearly identified veterinary costs. This amount will be subject to allocation based on the occupancy of the home ratio. *Page 27 E. Hansen's Personal Deductions 1.

Sano v. PeaceHealth, Inc.

District Court, D. Oregon · Dec 4, 2024

Defendant established a committee to review religious exemption requests and began processing such requests. Le Decl. ¶ 18. … Defendant then established a committee to review religious exemption requests and began processing such requests. Le Decl. ¶ 18.

East Valley Water v. Water Resources Commission

374 Or. 148 · Oregon Supreme Court · Aug 7, 2025

The term “benefi- cial use” is not specifically defined by statute, but qualifying beneficial uses include domestic use, municipal water sup- ply, irrigation, power development, industrial use, mining, recreation, conservation … That concept is reflected most clearly in ORS 540.610(1), which provides that “beneficial use” is the “basis, the measure and the limit of all rights to use of water” in the state.