Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
2.35s
Lehigh Valley Railroad v. State Board of Taxes & Assessment
105 N.J.L. 349 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Feb 4, 1929
The tax was assessed by the state board of taxes and assessment under authority conferred upon it by the provisions of the Eailroad Tax act of 1888 {Comp.
Cited 0 timesPublishedOcean Grove Camp Meeting Ass'n v. Board of Education
3 N.J. Misc. 660 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jun 3, 1925
Cited 0 timesPublishedCity of Linden v. Board of Public Utility Commissioners
3 N.J. Misc. 691 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jun 22, 1925
Cited 0 timesPublishedHackensack Water Co. v. State Board of Taxes & Assessment
4 N.J. Misc. 838 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Oct 7, 1926
This case is controlled by the case of the Hackensack Water Co. v. State Board of Taxes and Assessment, 4 N. J. Mis. R. 567, decided the present May term of the court.
Cited 0 timesPublishedRahway Valley Railroad v. Board of Public Utility Commissioners
5 N.J. Misc. 338 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Mar 10, 1927
It is objected that this is improper practice and that we should consider no evidence except that taken before the board. … the parties and conferring jurisdiction on the board should receive careful examination.
Cited 0 timesPublishedCity of Plainfield v. State Board of Tax Appeals
125 N.J.L. 187 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Aug 23, 1940
The valuations have gone through the statutory course— made by the local assessors, appealed to the county board of taxation and again appealed to the state board. … The state board in every instance reduced the assessment below that fixed by either the assessors or the county board; and inasmuch as the testimony was taken before a single member, the board finding really rests upon the
Cited 0 timesPublishedRutgers University Student Assembly (Rusa) v. Middlesex County Board of Elections
438 N.J. Super. 93 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Nov 19, 2014
Defendants' citation to two federal district court cases, Diaz v. Cobb, 541 F. Supp. 2d 1319 (S.D. Fla. 2008), and Acorn v. Bysiewicz, 413 F. Supp. 2d 119 (D. … [Curtis v.
Cited 11 timesPublishedCity of Newark v. Essex County Board of Taxation
138 N.J. Super. 217 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Dec 19, 1975
County boards of taxation have the duty to equalize aggregate assessments. N. J. 8. A. 54:3-17; Kearny v. Division of Tax Appeals, 35 N. J. 299, 305 (1961); Newark v. Essex Cty. Bd. of Taxation, 124 N. J. … board * * *.”
Cited 0 timesPublishedCity of Newark v. Essex County Board of Taxation
77 N.J. 494 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jun 21, 1978
Cited 0 timesPublishedHarris v. State Board of Registration & Examination in Dentistry
9 N.J. Misc. 635 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jun 4, 1931
The writ of certiorari brings up for review a resolution, of the state board of registration and examination in dentistry-revoking the license of Simon Harris to practice dentistry in. this state. … The board found, from the proofs adduced, that Harris was guilty of malpractice and the publications of false, fraudulent'and misleading statements of his art, skill and knowledge.
Cited 0 timesPublishedCity of Plainfield v. State Board of Tax Appeals
19 N.J. Misc. 313 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Apr 8, 1941
Rep. (2d) 325; Gannon v. State Board of Tax Appeals, 123 N. J. L. 450; 9 Atl. Rep. (2d) 531. … Atlantic City v. State Board of Tax Appeals, 123 N. J. L. 464; 9 Atl. Rep. (2d) 702. Ooncededly there is no proof of any such sales in the instant case. Thus each party resorted to expert witnesses. William O.
Cited 0 timesPublishedHackensack Water Co. v. State Board of Taxes & Assessment
5 N.J. Misc. 1094 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Nov 11, 1927
Cited 0 timesPublishedState ex rel. Powell v. Board of Chosen Freeholders
59 N.J.L. 117 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jun 15, 1896
The relator asks for a mandamus to compel the defendant, the board of freeholders of the county of Camden, to fix his fees and expenses, as keeper of the morgue of that county, for the recovery and care of the bodies of the … dead ■during his term of office. *118 The act-relative to morgues and moi’gue-keepers provides-that the fees and expenses of moigue-keepers for the recovery and care of the bodies of the.unknown dead shall be fixed by the board
Cited 0 timesPublishedAmerican Fidelity & Casualty Co. v. State Board of Education
126 N.J.L. 210 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Feb 27, 1941
The State Board properly held that R. … was imposed by the State Board regulation.
Cited 0 timesPublishedBorough of Oradell v. State Board of Tax Appeals
123 N.J.L. 86 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Aug 14, 1939
The judgment of the county board, in the circumstances, was a nullity. … We think the judgment of the state board was right. See Mellor v. Kaighn, 89 N. J. L. 543, and Shrewsbury v. Merchants Steamboat Co., 76 Id. 407.
Cited 0 timesPublishedState Board of Med. Examiners of N.J. v. Blechschmidt
106 N.J.L. 602 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · May 20, 1929
Cited 0 timesPublishedBucholtz v. Board of Adjustments of City of Ventnor
106 N.J.L. 562 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · May 19, 1930
Cited 0 timesPublishedCity of Newark v. Essex County Board of Taxation
127 N.J.L. 314 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Nov 13, 1941
Duke Power Co. v. Somerset County Board, 124 N. J. L. 481; affirmed, 125 Id. 431. There seems to be no dispute as to the correctness of this characterization. … Duke Power Co. v. Essex County Board, &c., 122 Id. 589; affirmed, 124 Id. 41. Eixed capital may or may not be personalty having a situs in the City of Newark.
Cited 0 timesPublishedCity of Hoboken v. State Board of Tax Appeals
117 N.J.L. 119 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Oct 2, 1936
This appeal is from an order of the Supreme Court refusing to quash certain subpoenas requiring the appellants, who were members of the state board of tax appeals, to appear and testify as witnesses before a Supreme- Court
Cited 0 timesPublishedHoboken Ferry Co. v. State Board of Taxes & Assessment
103 N.J.L. 148 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Oct 18, 1926
On appeal to the state board from the larger assessment it was reduced to $98,000, and on review by certiorari was still further reduced by the Supreme Court to $75,000 per acre for each year. … This rule, stated in Yellow Pine Co. v. Board of Assessors, 72 N. J. L. 182, has been so many times reiterated in this court that it needs no further citation of authority. The judgment of the Supreme Court is affirmed.
Cited 0 timesPublished
Ask Donna