Opinion

Hackensack Water Co. v. State Board of Taxes & Assessment

  • 5 N.J. Misc. 1094
  • 139 A. 925
  • 1927 N.J. Sup. Ct. LEXIS 65
Court
Supreme Court of New Jersey
Filed
Nov 11, 1927
Status
Published
Cited by
0 cases

The opinion

Per Curiam.

This case presents the same question as is presented in No. 281 of the May term, 1927. The only difference is that the property of the prosecutor assessed is in another taxing district, the borough of Haworth, in the county of Bergen. For the reasons set forth in the opinion in case No. 281 the rule to show cause is discharged, with costs.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.