Case law

City of Plainfield v. State Board of Tax Appeals

126 N.J.L. 577 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jun 6, 1941

The board dismissed the appeal on the land. Thereupon, an appeal was made to the State Board of Tax Appeals as to the assessment on the land. … New Jersey Bell Telephone Co. v. City of Newark, 118 N. J. L. 490; affirmed, 124 Id. 451. See, also, City of Plainfield v. State Board of Tax Appeals et al., 126 Id. 407.

Commercial Casualty Insurance v. State Board of Tax Appeals

120 N.J.L. 186 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Apr 29, 1938

Washburn Bros. Co. v. State Board of Tax Appeals

127 N.J.L. 321 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Nov 13, 1941

In Trenton, &c., Traction Co. v. Mercer County Tax Board, 91 Id. 105, there was proof of value by the taxpayer. The case of West Orange v. Essex County Tax Board, 18 N. J. Mis. R. 383, is also not in point. … New Jersey Bell Telephone Co. v. Newark, 118 N. J. L. 490; Tennant v. Jersey City, 122 Id. 174; affirmed, 123 Id. 200; Zoller v. State Board, &c., 124 Id. 376. The State Board of Tax Appeals followed this view.

Baldwin v. Board of Adjustment, City of East Orange

106 N.J.L. 230 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Oct 14, 1929

Heintze v. New Jersey State Board of Medical Examiners

110 N.J.L. 24 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jan 23, 1933

City of Newark v. Essex County Board of Taxation

77 N.J. 494 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jun 21, 1978

City of Newark v. Essex County Board of Taxation

138 N.J. Super. 217 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Dec 19, 1975

County boards of taxation have the duty to equalize aggregate assessments. N. J. 8. A. 54:3-17; Kearny v. Division of Tax Appeals, 35 N. J. 299, 305 (1961); Newark v. Essex Cty. Bd. of Taxation, 124 N. J. … board * * *.”

Hackensack Water Co. v. State Board of Taxes & Assessment

5 N.J. Misc. 1094 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Nov 11, 1927

City of Plainfield v. State Board of Tax Appeals

19 N.J. Misc. 313 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Apr 8, 1941

Rep. (2d) 325; Gannon v. State Board of Tax Appeals, 123 N. J. L. 450; 9 Atl. Rep. (2d) 531. … Atlantic City v. State Board of Tax Appeals, 123 N. J. L. 464; 9 Atl. Rep. (2d) 702. Ooncededly there is no proof of any such sales in the instant case. Thus each party resorted to expert witnesses. William O.

Harris v. State Board of Registration & Examination in Dentistry

9 N.J. Misc. 635 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jun 4, 1931

The writ of certiorari brings up for review a resolution, of the state board of registration and examination in dentistry-revoking the license of Simon Harris to practice dentistry in. this state. … The board found, from the proofs adduced, that Harris was guilty of malpractice and the publications of false, fraudulent'and misleading statements of his art, skill and knowledge.

West Shore Railroad v. Board Of Public Utility Commissioners

11 N.J. Misc. 149 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Mar 1, 1933

This writ of certiorari brings up an order of the board of public utility commissioners, dated June 25th, 1931, modifying a previous order which directed the elimination of a grade crossing at Bogota. … This is known as P-5 revised, or the board’s plan. The railroads contend that the original plan, B-2, should have been retained.

Newark Fire Insurance v. State Board of Tax Appeals

120 N.J.L. 224 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Apr 29, 1938

Sun Oil Co. v. Essex County Board of Taxation

122 N.J.L. 594 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jul 11, 1939

The judgment under review will be set aside for the reasons stated in Duke Power Co. v. The Essex County Board of Taxation and the City of Newark, 122 N. J. L. 589.

Atlantic City & Shore Railroad v. State Board of Assessors

87 N.J.L. 137 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Feb 16, 1915

Paterson, &c., Electric Co. v. State Board of Assessors, 69 Id. 116; 70 Id. 825. This assessment cannot be set aside on that ground. … Griffith v. City of Trenton, 76 Id. 23; State v. Twining, 73 Id. 683; State v. Corson, 67 Id. 178; Stagway v. Riker, 84 Id. 201. The assessment is therefore affirmed.

State Board of Forest Park Reservation Commissioners v. Veeder

87 N.J.L. 479 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jun 10, 1915

This case, though it differs in its facts from those which were present in State Board of Forest Park Reservation Commissioners against McCloskejr, decided at the present term of court, nevertheless calls for the application

State ex rel. Powell v. Board of Chosen Freeholders

59 N.J.L. 117 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jun 15, 1896

The relator asks for a mandamus to compel the defendant, the board of freeholders of the county of Camden, to fix his fees and expenses, as keeper of the morgue of that county, for the recovery and care of the bodies of the … dead ■during his term of office. *118 The act-relative to morgues and moi’gue-keepers provides-that the fees and expenses of moigue-keepers for the recovery and care of the bodies of the.unknown dead shall be fixed by the board

American Fidelity & Casualty Co. v. State Board of Education

126 N.J.L. 210 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Feb 27, 1941

The State Board properly held that R. … was imposed by the State Board regulation.

Borough of Oradell v. State Board of Tax Appeals

123 N.J.L. 86 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Aug 14, 1939

The judgment of the county board, in the circumstances, was a nullity. … We think the judgment of the state board was right. See Mellor v. Kaighn, 89 N. J. L. 543, and Shrewsbury v. Merchants Steamboat Co., 76 Id. 407.

Hoboken Ferry Co. v. State Board of Taxes & Assessment

103 N.J.L. 148 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Oct 18, 1926

On appeal to the state board from the larger assessment it was reduced to $98,000, and on review by certiorari was still further reduced by the Supreme Court to $75,000 per acre for each year. … This rule, stated in Yellow Pine Co. v. Board of Assessors, 72 N. J. L. 182, has been so many times reiterated in this court that it needs no further citation of authority. The judgment of the Supreme Court is affirmed.

City of Newark v. Essex County Board of Taxation

127 N.J.L. 314 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Nov 13, 1941

Duke Power Co. v. Somerset County Board, 124 N. J. L. 481; affirmed, 125 Id. 431. There seems to be no dispute as to the correctness of this characterization. … Duke Power Co. v. Essex County Board, &c., 122 Id. 589; affirmed, 124 Id. 41. Eixed capital may or may not be personalty having a situs in the City of Newark.