Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
2.39s
BW Offshore USA, LLC v. TVT Offshore
145 F. Supp. 3d 658 · District Court, E.D. Louisiana · Nov 13, 2015
The parties disagree, however, as to whether these features qualify it as vessel. … A plain reading of the contract, however, shows that this term is clearly defined in paragraph 11.2. 40 Though paragraph 13.2 references paragraph 10.2 for a definition of the “Owner’s Group,” this is an obvious typographical
Cited 1 timesPublishedVictoria Dauzat v. Dolgencorp, LLC
Louisiana Court of Appeal · Apr 6, 2016
that the finding is clearly wrong (manifestly erroneous). … [T]he effect of the assertion of the conditional or qualified privilege is to rebut the plaintiff’s allegations of fault and shift the burden to plaintiff to establish abuse of the privilege. Smith [v.
Cited 0 timesUnknownGilstrap v. SYNALLOY CORP., INDUS. PIPING SUPPLY CO.
409 F. Supp. 621 · District Court, M.D. Louisiana · Mar 15, 1976
It contends, however, that plaintiff’s duties while in its employ qualified him as an executive and/or administrative employee exempt from the provisions of the Act. The Court concludes that Mr. … Gilstrap’s case, these pertinent factors clearly indicate the applicability of the administrative exemption.
Cited 5 timesPublishedMcLaughlin v. Fireman's Fund Ins. Co.
582 So. 2d 203 · Louisiana Court of Appeal · Jun 5, 1991
This factual finding is not clearly wrong. The answer to the question of whether Glasper failed to yield the right-of-way is one where we find the jury to be clearly wrong. … Trooper Blunschi was qualified as an expert witness in accident reconstruction.
Cited 11 timesPublishedSmith v. Wiley Wood Construction Company
247 So. 2d 904 · Louisiana Court of Appeal · May 10, 1971
Steck diagnosed the condition as a psychotic reaction, although he qualified this diagnosis with the statement that in his opinion plaintiff was "exaggerating his complaint a bit." Dr. … On the contrary, his finding of fact was clearly correct. For the foregoing reasons, the judgment of the lower court is affirmed. The plaintiff is to pay all costs incurred herein. Affirmed.
Cited 8 timesPublishedState Ex Rel. Rathe v. Jefferson Parish School Board
206 La. 317 · Supreme Court of Louisiana · Dec 13, 1943
It is only when it is clearly shown that the action of such a board is beyond its authority or is arbitrary, unreasonable, or fraudulent that a court is justified in interfering.” … The record clearly shows that the principal’s nine monthly reports and the principal’s session report were each erroneous in reporting the absences.
Cited 63 timesPublished145 So. 3d 233 · Supreme Court of Louisiana · May 22, 2013
Clearly, then, the subpoenas requested by the District Attorney fail to meet 14the statutory requirements of La. C.E. art. 507; but they are improper for another, more fundamental reason. … I, § 13 provides, in relevant part: “The legislature shall provide for a uniform system for securing and compensating qualified counsel for indigents." .
Cited 0 timesPublished161 La. 827 · Supreme Court of Louisiana · May 31, 1926
Cole,‘and ;not paid, or returned, and this tes"timonywas offered on the same point, to further ■establish thé fact, and to show that the defendant. did not have money to pay checks of his depositors, with large balances to … The judge says: “This testimony was clearly in rebuttal of defendant’s testimony that it was not necessary to keep such books and make such entries.”
Cited 28 timesPublishedBreaux v. Texas & Pacific Railway Co.
147 So. 2d 693 · Louisiana Court of Appeal · Dec 14, 1962
In the Brown case the Supreme Court clearly held that pursuant to Act 30 of 1960 and LSA-C.C.P. Article 1111, the initial defendant was entitled to implead his alleged tort feasor. … They are, therefore, immune to liability for the debts of the succession they have inherited and are entitled by such acceptance merely to the net estate of their said ancestor, if any.
Cited 11 timesPublishedArcher Daniels Midland Co. v. PARISH SCHOOL BD.
802 So. 2d 1270 · Supreme Court of Louisiana · Nov 28, 2001
Charles Parish, clearly, St. … It is well established that exemptions from taxation are strictly construed against the taxpayer claiming the benefit thereof and must be clearly, unequivocally, and affirmatively established by the taxpayer.
Cited 15 timesPublishedIn re the Succession of Augustus
400 So. 2d 1172 · Louisiana Court of Appeal · Apr 13, 1981
With respect to appeals involving factual questions, it is well established that appellate courts are to accord great weight to the trial court’s findings which will not be disturbed unless manifestly erroneous. … Molligan was qualified and accepted as an expert witness on the subject of handwriting analysis.
Cited 3 timesPublished691 So. 2d 848 · Louisiana Court of Appeal · Apr 2, 1997
During its regular 1993 session, the Louisiana legislature qualified La.C.C. art. 189, by enacting Act No. 32, now La.R.S. 9:305, effective August 15, 1993. … To justify a preliminary injunction, the applicant must establish the likelihood of irreparable injury by clear and convincing evidence. Lighthouse Life Ins. Co., Inc. v.
Cited 11 timesPublishedPriola Construction Corp. v. Profast Development Group, Inc.
9 La.App. 3 Cir. 342 · Louisiana Court of Appeal · Oct 7, 2009
An agreement would be required in order to establish a fiduciary relationship between a financial institution and a customer. … Id. at 627 . *461 | ^Louisiana Revised Statutes 6:1124 clearly provides that there is no fiduciary relationship between a bank and a third party unless agreed to in writing that a relationship of agency or trust exists between
Cited 6 timesPublishedMajor Transports, Ltd. v. Courville
493 So. 2d 109 · Louisiana Court of Appeal · Jun 2, 1986
The testimony at trial also showed that Goldrus has discontinued paying a per diem allowance because there is no longer a shortage of manpower in the industry. * * * * * * "The Court finds that evidence in this case clearly … We agree particularly with the trial judge's conclusion that the per diem allowance was intended as an inducement to attract qualified employees.
Cited 5 timesPublishedKasperski v. Patterson Services, Inc.
371 So. 2d 1254 · Louisiana Court of Appeal · Jul 2, 1979
Grubbs, qualified as an expert in mechanical engineering, testified that this accident was caused when the rear chain fastening the spool became loose, allowing the load to shift on the truck. … (Tr. 443) Clearly, had Mr. Romero chosen to take the precaution, a second chain could have been applied to secure the front terminal of the spool.
Cited 8 timesPublishedLouisiana Court of Appeal · Apr 1, 2026
Regarding the cause of the fire, the plaintiffs contend the investigation and report done by Bunton conflicted with that done by Stephens, who they claim is not a qualified expert. … Under the policy, Jones qualifies as a domestic employee because she was hired by either the deceased or an authorized agent for the estate of his household to provide familial around-the-clock care.
Cited 0 timesPublishedMitchell v. University of Louisiana System
154 F. Supp. 3d 364 · District Court, M.D. Louisiana · Dec 30, 2015
First, Defendant argues that there is no prima facie case because the Plaintiff was not qualified. Second, the Defendant argues that, even if she were qualified, Plaintiff has failed to establish pretext. … Prima Facie Case: Qualification To establish a prima facie case, Plaintiff must show that (1) she was denied a promotion; (2) she was qualified for the position; (3) she was within the protected class (over 40 years old);
Cited 8 timesPublishedTammy Simoneaux v. Lafayette Consolidated Government
Louisiana Court of Appeal · May 1, 2013
SATS argues that it established that it was entitled to the protections of La.R.S. 9:2795 and that Ms. … Simoneaux has failed to establish any intentional or grossly negligent acts on behalf of SATS. Blanket Tort Immunity Ms.
Cited 0 timesUnknown457 So. 2d 616 · Supreme Court of Louisiana · Sep 10, 1984
Louisiana law requires that before a witness may qualify as an expert a foundation establishing his competency must be provided to the satisfaction of the court. La. R.S. 15:466. … Ritter's testimony clearly outweighed its prejudicial effect, and it was properly admitted.
Cited 244 timesPublishedLouisiana Court of Appeal · Mar 30, 2022
Palowsky has alleged facts sufficient to establish any of these causes of action against Ms. … Though Judge Sharp clearly violated the Canons of Judicial Conduct, specifically Canon 3(A)(6), in the above stated acts, he has judicial immunity for civil damages for his participation in the acts alleged
Cited 0 timesUnknown
Ask Donna