Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

FiltersNJ

10,000+ results

0.99s

  • Buono v. Board of Trustees of Teachers' Pension & Annuity Fund

    188 N.J. Super. 488 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Feb 15, 1983

    Buono appeals from a determination of respondent Board of Trustees of the Teachers’ Pension and Annuity Fund (hereinafter “Trustees”) denying petitioner’s request that respondent reconsider its prior determination of March … In April 1976 petitioner, formerly a social worker employed by three boards of education and thus a member of the Fund, filed an application for ordinary disability retirement benefits.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • J.B./l.A./b.M./w.M./r.L. v. New Jersey State Parole Board(077235) (Statewide)

    229 N.J. 21 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · May 8, 2017

    In Minnesota v. … NEW JERSEY STATE PAROLE BOARD, Respondent. _______________________ L.A., Appellant, v. NEW JERSEY STATE PAROLE BOARD, Respondent. _______________________ B.M., Appellant, v.

    Cited 38 timesPublished
  • Public Service Railway Co. v. Board of Chosen Freeholders

    87 N.J. Eq. 518 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Mar 19, 1917

    Lane, V. C.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Public Service Railway Co. v. Board of Chosen Freeholders

    78 N.J. Eq. 20 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Nov 10, 1910

    Emery, V. C. … The board also had the right in proper cases to refuse to permit a street railway company to occupy a bridge with its tracks. Elmer v. Freeholders (Supreme Court, 1894), 57 N. J. Law (28 Vr.) 366.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • State ex rel. Christie v. Board of Chosen Freeholders

    76 N.J.L. 818 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Nov 16, 1908

    The writ of error in this case brings up for review a judgment of the Supreme Court granting a peremptory writ of mandamus, directed to the board of freeholders of Bergen county, the plaintiffs in error, and requiring them

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • South River & Sand Co. v. Board of Chosen Freeholders

    9 N.J. Misc. 387 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Apr 2, 1931

    This is an appeal from a judgment of the Middlesex County Circuit Court in favor of the plaintiff, South Eiver Sand Company, against the defendant, the board of chosen freeholders of the county of Middlesex, growing out of

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Atlantic City Railroad v. Board of Public Utility Commissioners

    109 N.J.L. 260 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · May 16, 1932

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Hoboken Ferry Co. v. State Board of Taxes & Assessment

    3 N.J. Misc. 361 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Mar 31, 1925

    The southerly portion of the tract is assessed by the state board of taxes and assessment as second-class railroad property at $75,000 per acre. … This *362 assessment was reduced on appeal to the state board of taxes and assessment to $98,000 per acre.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Hackensack Water Co. v. State Board of Taxes & Assessment

    4 N.J. Misc. 567 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jun 15, 1926

    The state board of taxes and assessment dismissed the prosecutor’s appeal, affirmed the judgment of the Bergen county board of taxation and confirmed the assessment. … If so, the case and the practice would then stand in the position pointed out in the case of Mercer County Traction Co. v. Mercer County Board of Taxation, 92 N. J. L. 398.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Town of Secaucus v. Board of Public Utility Commissioners

    7 N.J. Misc. 119 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jan 3, 1929

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Borough of Mountainside v. Board of Equalization of Taxes

    80 N.J.L. 38 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jun 13, 1910

    The board of equalization of taxes exempted the buildings and five acres of land. This was correct under the act of 1903 {Pamph. L., p. 394). … The judgment of the board of equalization is affirmed.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • State ex rel. Cleveland v. Board of Finance & Taxation

    39 N.J.L. 629 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Nov 15, 1877

    It further enacts that the award of' the arbitrators shall be final and binding upon all parties, and not subject to be reviewed, and that the board of finance and taxation shall forthwith pay to said Jeremiah B. … Cleveland the amount awarded to him, out of money in the treasury; and if there bb no money, then said board shall forthwith cause to be issued the bonds of the city, and out of the proceeds, pay to said Cleveland the sum

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Borough of Totowa v. State Board of Taxes & Assessment

    92 N.J.L. 646 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Feb 6, 1919

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Household Finance Corp. v. State Board of Tax Appeals

    126 N.J.L. 399 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · May 6, 1941

    of the board or briefed before us. … The Court of Errors and Appeals passed upon the statute of 1866 in Tatem et al. v. McChesney, Collector, &c., 35 N. J.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • City of Hoboken v. State Board of Tax Appeals

    128 N.J.L. 321 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Apr 23, 1942

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Sun Oil Co. v. Essex County Board of Taxation

    124 N.J.L. 133 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jan 25, 1940

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • West Shore Railroad v. Board of Public Utility Commissioners

    116 N.J.L. 193 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jan 31, 1936

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • City of Bayonne v. Board of Public Utility Commissioners

    126 N.J.L. 396 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · May 6, 1941

    L. 420; Delaware, Lackawanna and Western Railroad Co. v. Board of Public Utility Commissioners, 83 Id. 212; Erie Railroad Co. v. Board of Public Utility Commissioners, 89 Id. 57 (at p. 78); Township Committee, &c., v. … The decision of the Supreme Court in Erie Railroad Co. v. Public Utility Board, supra, reported in 85 N. J.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Garfield Box Co. v. Clifton Paper Board Co., Inc.

    125 N.J.L. 603 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jan 17, 1941

    Hinmon v. Somers Brick Co., 75 N. J. L. 869. A nuisance may be a private and a public one at the same time. 46 Corp. Jur. 646; Roessler and Hasslacher Chemical Co. v. Doyle, 73 N. J. L. 521; Cronin v. Bloemecke, 58 N. … McAndrews v. Collerd, 42 N. J. L. 189; 46 Corp. Jur. 663. Contributory negligence is not a defense to a public nuisance but assumption of risk is. Thompson v. Petrozzello, 5 N. J. Mis. R. 645; Hammond v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Berkeley Square Ass'n v. Zoning Board of Adjustment of Trenton

    410 N.J. Super. 255 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Oct 27, 2009

    State v. … See, e.g., Bonaventure Int’l Inc., v. Borough of Spring Lake, 350 N.J.Super. 420 , 795 A.2d 895 (App.Div.2002) 4 ; Ferraro v. Zoning Board of the Borough of Keansburg, 321 N.J.Super. 288 , 728 A.2d 863 (App.Div.1999).

    Cited 11 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.