Opinion

Borough of Totowa v. State Board of Taxes & Assessment

  • 92 N.J.L. 646
  • 106 A. 18
  • 1919 N.J. LEXIS 238
Court
Supreme Court of New Jersey
Filed
Feb 6, 1919
Status
Published
Author
Pee
On the bench
Pee
Cited by
0 cases

The opinion

Pee Curiam.

The judgment under review will be affirmed, for the reasons set forth in the opinion of the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Swayze, Trenchard, Parker, Minturn, Kalisch, White, Peppenheimer, Williams, Gardner, JJ. 11.

For reversal — if one.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.