Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
1.90s
District Court, N.D. Illinois · Sep 27, 2018
“Qualified immunity protects officers performing discretionary functions from civil liability so long as their conduct does not violate clearly established statutory or constitutional rights that a reasonable person … “A plaintiff seeking to defeat an assertion of qualified immunity must establish ‘that the law concerning the plaintiff’s asserted right was clearly established at the time the challenged conduct occurred.’”
Cited 0 timesUnknownOscar Mayer & Co. v. Industrial Commission
176 Ill. App. 3d 607 · Appellate Court of Illinois · Dec 1, 1988
Similarly, an employee is also clearly prejudiced in the giving of notice to the employer (see Ill. Rev. … Clearly, benefits are tied to the wage rate being earned on the date of accident. (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1987, ch. 48, par. 138.10.)
Cited 28 timesPublished53 F. Supp. 3d 1092 · District Court, C.D. Illinois · Jul 7, 2014
Defendants assert that they are entitled to qualified immunity, but their argument is undeveloped because they do not discuss Shaw or Higgason . … Qualified immunity is beside the point here anyway, because no rational juror could find that Plaintiffs pursuit of his soy case or his attempt to help other inmates file truthful grievances was a motivating factor behind
Cited 2 timesPublishedGammon v. Edwardsville Community Unit School District No. 7
82 Ill. App. 3d 586 · Appellate Court of Illinois · Mar 26, 1980
The plaintiff, however, continued to express her apprehension and indicated clearly she did not believe that her difficulties with Ladd were over. … See also Gardner, Changing Patterns in Illinois’ School Tort Immunity, 55 Chi.-Kent L. Rev. 605 , 612 (1979).
Cited 21 timesPublishedDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · Sep 30, 2023
Because Velez has enough evidence of constitutional- rights violations, (fabricating evidence and withholding exculpatory evidence), and those rights were clearly established in 2001, qualified immunity does not apply to … Because fabrication of evidence violates “clearly estab- lished constitutional rights,” qualified immunity does not apply to Goldish.
Cited 0 timesUnknown100 Ill. App. 3d 755 · Appellate Court of Illinois · Sep 30, 1981
It is well established that a prior inadmissible confession does not, in and of itself, render any later confession inadmissible. … He was clearly willing to repeat the confession to Wilkerson independent of his comments to Montesanto.
Cited 5 timesPublished2023 IL App (3d) 220105-U · Appellate Court of Illinois · Apr 20, 2023
The Tort Immunity Act “grants only immunities and defenses.” 745 ILCS 10/1-101.1(a) (West 2016). … ¶ 29 Further, section 3-102(b) of the Tort Immunity Act provides that a public entity does not have constructive notice of a dangerous condition if it establishes either: “(1) The existence
Cited 1 timesUnpublishedQuincy Trading Post, Inc. v. Department of Revenue
12 Ill. App. 3d 725 · Appellate Court of Illinois · Jul 5, 1973
The hearing officer added that the auditor’s testimony supported the defendant’s prima facie case which clearly showed the plaintiff’s sales did not qualify as interstate sales exempt from the retailer’s occupation tax. … The manager clearly had authority to direct the auditor to other employees in the course of his audit.
Cited 22 timesPublishedSmith v. Dovenmuehle Mortgage, Inc.
859 F. Supp. 1138 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Jun 10, 1994
Summary judgment must be granted “against a party who fails to make a showing sufficient to establish the *1141 existence of an element essential to that party’s case, and on which that party will bear the burden of proof … The content of the opinion clearly pertains to the issue of judicial estoppel and to hold otherwise would be to exalt form over substance. 5 .
Cited 40 timesPublished355 Ill. Dec. 417 · Illinois Supreme Court · Dec 1, 2011
. ¶ 11 Section 5-4-3(k)(1) establishes a State Offender DNA Identification System Fund (Fund), "a special fund in the State Treasury." 730 ILCS 5/5-4-3(k)(1) (West 2008). … . ¶ 19 Marshall establishes, first, that the DNA analysis charge clearly is compensatory. It is intended to cover the cost of analyzing the offender's DNA, and therefore is paid only once.
Cited 4 timesPublished20 Ill. 2d 486 · Illinois Supreme Court · Dec 1, 1960
Conti’s office is established conformably to section 9 — 75 of the Revised Cities and Villages Act (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1959, chap. 24, par. 9 — 75). … Sonnemann, clearly recognizes that an individual performing purely ministerial acts does not hold a lucrative office under the State. One defendant enjoys civil service status.
Cited 22 timesPublished360 F. Supp. 499 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · May 23, 1973
In order to qualify as a “provider” of hospital services reimbursable by Medicare, a hospital must establish a Utilization Review Committee, composed of two or more physicians, which periodically certifies the medical need … Clearly, none of this was done until four months after her discharge and then by only one physician as opposed to the required two. Mrs.
Cited 0 timesPublishedVaughn v. City of West Frankfort
166 Ill. 2d 155 · Illinois Supreme Court · May 18, 1995
The appellate court also opined that the costs of guarding against injury "clearly suggest the imposition of a duty in the pedestrian-defect type of case.” ( 258 Ill. App. 3d at 433-34 .) … Although we are sympathetic to plaintiffs injuries, the Illinois legislature has established a clear public policy to immunize government from the financial burdens of preventing injuries which occur as a result of unintended
Cited 1 timesPublished275 Ill. 581 · Illinois Supreme Court · Oct 24, 1916
Sections 2 to-4, inclusive, provide the manner in which such high school district may be organized and established. … That part of the section relied upon is as follows: “The General Assembly shall not pass local or special laws * * * granting to any corporation, association or individual any special or exclusive privilege, immunity or franchise
Cited 41 timesPublishedDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · Feb 23, 2022
of their conduct was clearly established at the time.” … right, and (2) that the unlawfulness of the conduct was clearly established at the time the officer acted.”
Cited 0 timesUnknownThiems Construction Co. v. State
45 Ill. Ct. Cl. 267 · Court of Claims of Illinois · May 10, 1993
In addition, it was established that Thiems had exceeded the WBE/DBE goals on earlier projects. Further, it was proven that Theims did ultimately notify DOT of McMillin s failure to perform. … There is clearly no indication that Thiems intended to avoid its obligations.
Cited 1 timesPublishedChristian Action Ministry v. Department of Local Government Affairs
74 Ill. 2d 51 · Illinois Supreme Court · Dec 4, 1978
The phrase “all final administrative decisions” is neither limited nor qualified. … Questions about the propriety of an exemption or denial of exemption clearly lend themselves to meaningful judicial review. (See our analysis of the second issue below.)
Cited 49 timesPublishedDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · Sep 9, 2026
Because the approach established by Monell is the only means for establishing municipal liability under Section 1983, see, e.g., Chortek v. … The Court also rejects the Defendant Officers’ argument that they are entitled to qualified immunity at this early stage of litigation. See Reed v.
Cited 0 timesUnknownWalker v. Berkshire Foods, Inc.
41 Ill. App. 3d 595 · Appellate Court of Illinois · Aug 19, 1976
App. 3d 509 , 341 N.E.2d 425 , the court stated that its decision in Marcus should not be read as a sweeping repeal of employer immunity, despite the seemingly broad language employed. … Clearly, under the allegations of plaintiff’s complaint, Berkshire occupied a position as plaintiff s employer and no other.
Cited 12 timesPublishedLeetaru v. The Board of Trustees of the University of Illinois
392 Ill. Dec. 275 · Illinois Supreme Court · Apr 16, 2015
That is something they clearly have authority to do in furtherance of the University’s educational mission. … Immunity from suit in the circuit courts is established by the Immunity Act, not the Court of Claims Act. See, e.g., Brandon v. Bonell, 368 Ill.
Cited 47 timesUnpublished
Ask Donna