Case law

Clinton v. Hake

185 Tenn. 476 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Nov 29, 1947

Reese v. Hake, supra. … It is under this state of facts that we have a concurrence of the Board of Review and the Chancellor. In Ezell v. Hake, 184 Tenn. 319 , 198 S. W. (2d) 809, 811 , this Court speaking on the subject, through Mr.

Tennessee Mining & Manufacturing Co. v. Cooper

176 Tenn. 229 · Tennessee Supreme Court · May 18, 1940

Tomlinson v. Board of Equalization, 88 Tenn., 1, 12 S. W., 414 , 6 L. R. A., 207; Savage Co. v. City of Knoxville, 167 Tenn., 642 , 72 S. W. (2d), 1057 ; Anderson v. Memphis, 167 Tenn., 648 , 72 S. … found and fixed by said Board.”

Haley Mariah Anderson v. Paul E. Stanton, Jr.

Court of Appeals of Tennessee · May 26, 2010

Hunter v. Brown, 955 S.W.2d 49, 50-51 (Tenn. 1997); Cowden v. Sovran Bank/Cent. S., 816 S.W.2d 741, 744 (Tenn. 1991). … C.S.C. v. Knox County Board of Education, No. E2006-00087-COA-R3-CV, 2006 Tenn. App. LEXIS 802, at **25-28 (Tenn. Ct. App. Dec. 19, 2006), no appl. perm. appeal filed.

City of Memphis v. Sherwood Building Corp.

208 Tenn. 17 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Dec 9, 1960

And, if, upon an examination of the evidence before the Board, the Courts find that “there is any material evidence to sustain the board’s finding, its action should be affirmed”. Putnam County Beer Board v. … Citing Putnam County Beer Board v. Specie, supra. But whether or not the Court of Appeals overlooked the foregoing quotation from Shelton v. Mooneyhcm, the fact remains that Shelton v.

Ward v. North American Rayon Corporation

211 Tenn. 535 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Mar 13, 1963

Chief Justice Hughes, Consolidated Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations Board, 305 U.S. 197 , 59 S.Ct. 206, 217 , 83 L.Ed. 126, 127, 140 ; Cude v. … Spence, 198 Tenn. 316, 321 , 279 S.W.2d 509 ; London & Lancashire v. Starcher, 202 Tenn. 278, 281, 282 , 304 S.W.2d 87, 88-89 ; Brown Shoe Co. v. Reed, 209 Tenn. 106, 117 , 350 S.W.2d 65, 70 .

Simm v. Dougherty

186 Tenn. 356 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Feb 28, 1948

Ezell v. Hake, 184 Tenn. 319 , 198 S. W. (2d) 809, 811 ; National Optical Stores Co., Inc. v. Bryant, 181 Tenn. 266 , 181 S. W. (2d) 139 . By the complainant’s own admission, there was such material evidence. … Though we are not in a position to make any recommendations, in view of the facts and punishment imposed in Prosterman v. Tennessee State Board of Dental Examiners, 168 Tenn. 16 , 73 S.

Petition of Youngblood

895 S.W.2d 322 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Feb 16, 1995

Belmont v. Board of Law Examiners, 511 S.W.2d 461, 462 (Tenn.1974). See also, Petition of Tenn. … See MARTA v. Metro.

State ex rel. Davis v. Evans

122 Tenn. 184 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Sep 15, 1909

Rep., 195 ; Scholle v. State, 90 Md., 729 , 46 Atl., 326 , 50 L. R. A., 411, 414; State v. Thompson, 160 Mo., 333 , 60 S. W., 1077 , 54 L. R. A., 950, 952-953, 83 Am. St. Rep., 468 ; Hurst v. … W., 189 ; Staggs v. State, 3 Humph., 372 ).

Schoenly v. Nashville Speedways, Inc.

208 Tenn. 107 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Mar 10, 1961

In Morris v. … Snyder v. Witt, supra, 99 Tenn. 621, 622 , 42 S.W. 442 ; Hime v.

Flatt v. Tennessee Handle Co.

190 Tenn. 190 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Mar 17, 1950

Brown who found that the degree of plaintiff’s disability had progressed to 23 per cent. On July 24, 1949, he was again examined by Dr. Brown who pronounced his disability to he 50 per cent. … Thus in Hartwell Motor Co., Inc. v. Hickerson, 160 Tenn. 513, 520 , 26 S.

Gamble v. State

206 Tenn. 376 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Mar 11, 1960

Hicks v. Rhea County, 189 Tenn. 383 , 225 S.W.2d 544 ; Elliott v. Fuqua, 185 Tenn. 200 , 204 S.W.2d 1016 ; Caldwell v. Harris, 185 Tenn. 209 , 204 S.W.2d 1019 ; Mensi v. Walker, 160 Tenn. 468 , 26 S.W.2d 132 ; House v. … In Board of Health of Covington v.

Vason v. Nickey

293 F. Supp. 1405 · District Court, W.D. Tennessee · Dec 31, 1968

Smith v. McNeal, 109 U.S. 426 , 3 S.Ct. 319 , 27 L.Ed. 986 (1883); Burns v. Peoples Tel. & Tel. Co., 161 Tenn. 382 , 33 S.W.2d 76 (1930). However, the general rule has exceptions. … See Smith v. McNeal, supra; Burns v. Peoples Tel. & Tel. Co., supra; Green v. Prince, 53 Tenn.App. 541 , 385 S.W.2d 127 (1964); 6 A.L.R.3d 1043 .

State of Tennessee v. John W. Smith

Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · Feb 24, 2016

Finally, Defendant insists that his case is “totally different” from State v. Adrian R. Brown, __ S.W.3d __, No. E2014-00673-SC-R11-CD, 2015 WL 7748275 (Tenn. … Brown, ___ S.W.3d ___, 2015 WL 7748275, at *9. See also Tucker v. Morrow, 335 S.W.3d 116, 124 (Tenn. Crim. App. 2009) (overruled by Adrian R. Brown).

Settle v. Tennessee Department of Correction

276 S.W.3d 420 · Court of Appeals of Tennessee · May 27, 2008

Review under a writ of certiorari is limited to whether the inferior board or tribunal exceeded its jurisdiction or acted illegally, arbitrarily, or fraudulently. McCallen v. … In Clark v. Rose, 183 S.W.3d 669 (Tenn. Ct.

State of Tennessee v. Tevin Mantez Harris

Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · Oct 1, 2020

Id.; see U.S. v. … Miller v. State, 520 S.W.2d 729, 734 (Tenn. 1975) (quoting Neal v. State, 334 S.W.2d 731 (Tenn. 1960)).

Metropolitan Government of Nashville And Davidson County, Tennessee v. Board of Zoning Appeals Of Nashville And Davidson County, Tennessee

Court of Appeals of Tennessee · May 2, 2017

A reviewing court may grant relief only when the board, exercising judicial functions, has exceeded its jurisdiction or acted illegally, arbitrarily, or fraudulently. Tenn. Code Ann. § 27-8-101; McCallen v. … The scope of review by the appellate courts is no broader than that of the chancery court in these cases with respect to evidence presented before the board. Watts v. Civil Serv.

State Ex Rel. v. Humphreys

163 Tenn. 20 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Jul 3, 1931

In Hunter v. … On the other hand, in James v.

Davison v. Carr

659 S.W.2d 361 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Oct 31, 1983

Fairhaven Corporation v. Tennessee Health Facilities Commission, 566 S.W.2d 885, 886 (Tenn.App.1976). T.C.A. § 6-20-220, under which Mrs. … Watts v. Civil Service Board of Columbia, 606 S.W.2d 274, 276-7 (Tenn.1980). See also Cantrell, Review of Administrative Decisions by Writ of Certiorari in Tennessee, 4 Memphis St.L. Rev. 19 (1973).

McBee v. State

213 Tenn. 15 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Sep 11, 1963

See White v. State, supra; Holt v. State, 210 Tenn. 188 , 357 S.W.2d 57 (1962); Anderson v. State, 207 Tenn. 486 , 341 S.W.2d 385 (1960); Turner v. State, 188 Tenn. 312 , 219 S.W.2d 188 (1949); Batey v. … See Rule 32 (Rules of this Court); Nashville v. State, Board of Equalization, 210 Tenn. 587, 618 , 360 S.W.2d 458 .

Jackson v. Bible

611 S.W.2d 588 · Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Oct 27, 1980

If the finding of the board of review is supported by any evidence, judicial review is limited to questions of law. T.C.A. § 50-1325(1); Cawthron v. Scott (1966) 217 Tenn. 668 , 400 S.W.2d 240 . … See: Aluminum Company of America v. Walker (1960) 207 Tenn. 417 , 340 S.W.2d 898 ; Bailey v. Tennessee Dept. of Employment Security (1963) 212 Tenn. 422 , 370 S.W.2d 492 ; Duke v.