Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
5.01s
50 Tenn. App. 532 · Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Mar 27, 1962
Saulman v. Mayor, etc., 131 Tenn. 427 , 175 S. W. 532 , L. R. A. 1915 E, 316; Memphis Power and Light Company v. City of Memphis, 172 Tenn. 346 , 112 S. W. (2d) 817 ; Watts v. Town of Dickson, 36 Tenn. App. 678 , 260 S. … In Town of McMinnville v. Curtis, et al., 183 Tenn. 442, 446 , 192 S.
Cited 2 timesPublished129 Tenn. 383 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Dec 15, 1913
See Wright v. State, 23 Tenn. (4 Humph.), 196; Wyatt v. State, 32 Tenn. (2 Swan), 293; Brown v. State, 65 Tenn. (6 Baxt.), 424. … See Brown v. State, 65 Tenn. (6 Baxt.), 422.
Cited 6 timesPublishedState of Tennessee v. David Reed
Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · Mar 29, 2016
State v. Brown, 479 S.W.3d 200, 211 (Tenn. 2015). … See Yates v. Parker, 371 S.W.3d 152, 155-56 (Tenn. Crim.
Cited 0 timesPublishedEstate of Marion English Truett (Deceased)
Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Apr 7, 1997
Uhrig v. … Uhrig v.
Cited 0 timesPublished180 Tenn. 74 · Tennessee Supreme Court · May 8, 1943
State ex rel. v. Hamilton County, 170 Tenn., 371 , 95 S. W. (2d), 618 . … See, also, Hamilton County v. Bryant, 175 Tenn., 123 , 132 S. W. (2d), 639 ; City of Knoxville et al. v. State ex rel. Hayward, 175 Tenn., 159 , 133 S. W. (2d), 465 .
Cited 8 timesPublished165 Tenn. 661 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Mar 18, 1933
State Board of Medical Examiners v. Friedman, 150 Tenn., 152 . … State, 130 Tenn., 100 , creating a board to parol prisoners; State Board of Medical Examiners v.
Cited 14 timesPublished155 Tenn. 476 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Jun 25, 1927
State Board of Pharmacy v. Matthews, 197 N. Y., 353 , 26 L. R. A. (N. S.), 1013. … State Board of Pharmacy v. Matthews, 197 N. Y., 353 , 26 L. R. A. (N. S.), 1013.
Cited 8 timesPublished84 F.R.D. 21 · District Court, M.D. Tennessee · Mar 2, 1979
Wright v. Stone Container Corp., 524 F.2d 1058, 1062 (8th Cir. 1975); Brown v. J.P. Allen Co., 79 F.R.D. 32, 35 (N.D.Ga.1978); Taylor v. Safeway Stores, Inc., 333 F.Supp. 83, 87 (D.Colo.1971), approved in Taylor v. … Motor Convoy, 68 F.R.D. 196 (N.D.Ga.1974), and Brown v. J.P. Allen Co., supra, in which the same court refused to allow class status to applicants. Finally, compare Dickerson v.
Cited 18 timesPublishedSettle v. Tennessee Department of Correction
276 S.W.3d 420 · Court of Appeals of Tennessee · May 27, 2008
Review under a writ of certiorari is limited to whether the inferior board or tribunal exceeded its jurisdiction or acted illegally, arbitrarily, or fraudulently. McCallen v. … In Clark v. Rose, 183 S.W.3d 669 (Tenn. Ct.
Cited 6 timesPublished682 S.W.2d 224 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · Aug 1, 1984
Under the totality of the circumstances we find the victim’s identification to be reliable under the criteria set forth in Neil v. Biggers, 409 U.S. 188 , 93 S.Ct. 375 , 34 L.Ed.2d 401 (1972). See Manson v. … Reliance is placed on the case of the State v. Brown, 552 S.W.2d 383 (Tenn.1977), as support for the motion which was filed by defendant.
Cited 8 timesPublished569 S.W.2d 450 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Aug 7, 1978
Bowman v. Henard, 547 S.W.2d 527 (Tenn.1977); Rural Educ. Ass’n. v. Bush, 42 Tenn. App. 34 , 298 S.W.2d 761 (1956). See also Vaughn v. … Floyd v. Walls, 26 Tenn.App. 151 , 168 S.W.2d 602 (1942); and Gresham v.
Cited 43 timesPublished569 S.W.2d 808 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Aug 25, 1978
See Rule 24, Civil Aeronautics Board, Regulation 96; United States v. Ford, infra; and United States v. DeBerry, infra. … See Staples v. Brown, 113 Tenn. 639 , 85 S.W. 254 (1905), and Cockrill v. Peoples Savings Bank, 155 Tenn. 342 , 293 S.W. 996 (1927).
Cited 65 timesPublished62 Tenn. App. 518 · Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Jul 31, 1970
The distance of 1066 feet used in the Tract 3 deed is patently incorrect and must yield to the uncontroverted landmarks, old Highway 79 on the south and the Brown fence line on the north. Morrison v. … In Bigham v.
Cited 6 timesPublishedMilburn L. Edwards v. State of Tennessee
Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · Aug 13, 2014
In Seals v. … Brown v. State, 928 S.W.2d 453, 456 (Tenn. Crim. App. 1996); Antonio Angel Onate v. State, No. M2013-00531-CCA- R3-PC, 2013 WL 4677697, at *3 (Tenn. Crim. App. Aug. 28, 2013); Clayton Bezuidenhout v. State, No.
Cited 0 timesPublished317 F. Supp. 923 · District Court, E.D. Tennessee · Jun 11, 1970
United States v. Celedonia, 95 F.Supp. 228 (W. D.Pa.1951) citing cases; also see, Johnson v. United States, 333 U.S. 10 , 68 S.Ct. 367 , 92 L.Ed. 436 (1948). … Steele v. United States No. 1, 267 U.S. 498, 503 , 45 S.Ct. 414, 416 , 69 L.Ed. 757 ; Fine v. United States, 207 F.2d 324 (C.A.6, 1954) applying Steele.
Cited 1 timesPublished3 Shan. Cas. 93 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Sep 15, 1879
[Boyd v. Marlin], 9 Heis., 883; [Robinson v. Brown], 1 Baxter, 207 ; Brown v. Jacobi, 10 Heis., 835. Let the chancellor’s decree be affirmed.
Cited 0 timesPublished213 Tenn. 15 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Sep 11, 1963
See White v. State, supra; Holt v. State, 210 Tenn. 188 , 357 S.W.2d 57 (1962); Anderson v. State, 207 Tenn. 486 , 341 S.W.2d 385 (1960); Turner v. State, 188 Tenn. 312 , 219 S.W.2d 188 (1949); Batey v. … See Rule 32 (Rules of this Court); Nashville v. State, Board of Equalization, 210 Tenn. 587, 618 , 360 S.W.2d 458 .
Cited 330 timesPublishedTennessee Mining & Manufacturing Co. v. Cooper
176 Tenn. 229 · Tennessee Supreme Court · May 18, 1940
Tomlinson v. Board of Equalization, 88 Tenn., 1, 12 S. W., 414 , 6 L. R. A., 207; Savage Co. v. City of Knoxville, 167 Tenn., 642 , 72 S. W. (2d), 1057 ; Anderson v. Memphis, 167 Tenn., 648 , 72 S. … found and fixed by said Board.”
Cited 2 timesPublishedState of Tennessee v. Joseph Jordan
Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · Feb 12, 2016
State v. Brown, 992 S.W.2d 389, 391 (Tenn. 1999). … State v. Brown, 29 S.W.3d 427, 434 (Tenn. 2000).
Cited 0 timesPublishedMIKHAIL, RAFIK v. FEDEX SUPPLY CHAIN, INC.
2026 TN WC 42 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · Apr 17, 2026
In Rosasco v. West Knoxville Painters, LLC, 2020 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS 57, at *8-9 (Aug. 18, 2020), the Appeals Board confirmed the continuing viability of this doctrine in post-Reform Act cases. … The Board in Rosasco pointed out an exception.
Cited 0 timesPublished
Ask Donna