Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

FiltersMA

10,000+ results

2.37s

  • Commonwealth v. Brown

    54 Mass. 365 · Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · Oct 15, 1847

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Crowell v. Brown

    75 Mass. 274 · Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · Oct 15, 1857

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Laflin v. Brown

    48 Mass. 576 · Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · Sep 15, 1844

    In this case no question was raised as to the execution of the mortgage deed and the assignment to the demandant ; but the questions submitted to the jury were, whether two of the notes given by the tenant Brown, and which … were secured by the mortgage, had been paid by him ; and also whether two other notes, given by said Brown to Laflin & Field, and which were intended to be secured by the assignment of the mortgage, were given to Laflin

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Dunham

    77 Mass. 42 · Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · Sep 15, 1858

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Thayer

    78 Mass. 1 · Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · Nov 15, 1858

    . • Fairbanks v. Blackington, 9 Pick. 93 . New trial ordered. A new trial was had at February term 1859, before Metcalf J., and resulted in a verdict for the defendant under instructions of the judge.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Holbrook

    70 Mass. 102 · Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · Sep 15, 1855

    Jones v. Hoar, 5 Pick. 285 . … Ayres v. Sleeper, 7 Met. 45 . Such is the rule where the owner of property himself consigns it, and subsequently brings an action, after an ineffectual attempt to regain possession of, or compensation for it.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • White v. Brown

    56 Mass. 412 · Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · Oct 15, 1848

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Vinal

    44 Mass. 533 · Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · Mar 15, 1842

    Cutter v. Powell, 6 T. R. 326. Countess of Plymouth v. Throgmorton, 1 Salk. 65. Hulle v. Heightman, 2 East, 145. Stark v. … The language of the instrument is — “ and the said V'nal ” & others, “ in consideration of one dollar paid, and also of the covenants above written, do covenant and agree to pay $ 1250 for the services of the said Brown ”

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Thorne v. Brown

    139 Mass. 35 · Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · Feb 28, 1885

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Cogswell v. Brown

    1 Mass. 180 · Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · Nov 15, 1804

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Tuttle v. Brown

    70 Mass. 457 · Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · Oct 15, 1855

    Stiles v. Western Railroad, 8 Met. 46 . 2. … Reggio v. Braggiotti, 7 Cush. 166 . Mayne on Damages, 88. The rule is the same in an action for a deceit in the sale. Stiles v. White; 11 Met. 356 .

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Commonwealth v. Brown

    73 Mass. 319 · Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · Oct 15, 1856

    See Commonwealth v. Thompson, 2 Gray, 82 . Exceptions sustained.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Coggeshall

    80 Mass. 134 · Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · Nov 15, 1859

    Sts. c. 109, § 36; Bartlett v. Bramhall, 3 Gray, 257 . B. Sanford, for the trustee. Upon a view of the answers, as explained by the report, the court are of opinion: 1.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Gilman

    115 Mass. 56 · Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · Mar 28, 1874

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Harrington v. Brown

    91 Mass. 579 · Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · Jan 15, 1865

    The court are of opinion that it is also void so far as it relates to the costs of the criminal prosecution then pending against Brown for larceny. … as they did, if they had not authorized Brown to make this deduction from it.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Pike v. Brown

    61 Mass. 133 · Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · Mar 15, 1851

    Fetch v. Taylor, 13 Pick. 133 . That was the assignment of a lease; this is the transfer of an equity of redemption. … In Goodwin v. Gilbert, the words in the deed poll, in which the duty was reserved, are not given; but in the case last cited, of Fetch v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Rixford v. Brown

    27 Mass. 30 · Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · Sep 15, 1830

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Bulkley

    65 Mass. 168 · Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · Sep 15, 1853

    Brown, in addition to what was formerly set off to her.” … The return of the officer upon the execution of Cole against Joseph Brown, referred to in the argument of the parties, is not very exactly or happily expressed.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Tweed

    84 Mass. 566 · Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · Oct 15, 1861

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Neale

    85 Mass. 74 · Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · Nov 15, 1861

    Gile v. Devens, 11 Cush. 59 . The writ not being rightfully altered, there could be no rightful service of it, after the alteration.

    Cited 0 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.