Opinion

Brown v. Dunham

  • 77 Mass. 42
Court
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Filed
Sep 15, 1858
Status
Published
Author
Thomas
On the bench
Thomas
Cited by
0 cases

The opinion

Thomas, J.

The notes, the amount of which the plaintiff seeks to recover from the administrator of his guardian, it is agreed as matter of fact, were given for the money of the ward. They were made payable to the defendant’s intestate in his own name. They were retained by the guardian, not negotiated nor pledged, nor in any way used for his own business. They are clearly identified and traced. The fact that they were made payable to the guardian in his own name and negotiable, without any evidence of appropriation, or of any attempt to appropriate them to his own use, is not sufficient evidence of his conversion of the money and mingling it with his own. Such breach of duty is not to be presumed, and the mere form of the notes fails to establish it. Judgment for the plaintiff.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.