Opinion

Crowell v. Brown

  • 75 Mass. 274
Court
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Filed
Oct 15, 1857
Status
Published
Author
Thomas
On the bench
Thomas
Cited by
0 cases

The opinion

Thomas, J.

The question is as to the breach of the bond.. That the vessel was not completed and delivered to the plaintiff according to the bond is agreed. The object of the bond is plain; security for the delivery of the vessel and for the ad vanees made upon her. The defendant says, there was no breach, because the five thousand dollars to be paid by the agreement for the construction of the vessel when it was in frame was not paid. As the bond was not given until after the vessel was in frame and the five thousand dollars had become-due, this construction would render performance on the part of the plaintiff impossible, and so the bond void from inception. Such construction clearly defeats the purposes of the contract.

Judgment for the plaintiff.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.