Case law

Employer Solutions Staffing Group v. SAIF

343 Or. App. 206 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Sep 4, 2025

Montez v. … Keenon v.

School District v. Palmer

41 Or. 485 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jul 7, 1902

court, or the board of commissioners in counties where this board is a separate body, shall constitute a board for laying off his county in convenient school districts, such board to be styled the District Boundary Board … W. 871 ); State v. Partlow, 91 N. C. 550 ( 49 Am. Rep. 652 ); Ward v. Ward, 37 Tex. 389 .

State v. Askay

96 Or. App. 563 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · May 17, 1989

State v. Caraher, 293 Or 741, 760 , 653 P2d 942 (1982). … The trial court found, in part: “We now approach one of the real interesting questions of this case, and that is the brown bag.

VanSpeybroeck v. Tillamook County

221 Or. App. 677 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Aug 13, 2008

Holland v. … See Lawrence v.

Ailes v. Portland Meadows, Inc.

312 Or. 376 · Oregon Supreme Court · Dec 12, 1991

See State v. Brown, supra, 310 Or at 355-56 (applying this method). This is not a requirement of mere form. … State v. Brown, 310 Or 347, 355-56 , 800 P2d 259 (1990); State v. Avent, 209 Or 181, 183 , 302 P2d 549 (1956).

State ex rel. Palacios v. Rea

179 Or. App. 431 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Feb 6, 2002

See State ex rel Baker v. Cook, 171 Or App 719 , 16 P3d 1184 (2000). Judgment for filing fees of $167 reversed; otherwise affirmed.

Wasco County v. American Federation of State, County & Municipal Employees, Local No. 2752

46 Or. App. 859 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jun 30, 1980

The rationale of the rule was explained by the Supreme Court in Labor Board v. … , e.g., Marbet v.

SAIF Corp. v. Kurcin

334 Or. 399 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jul 25, 2002

SAIF v. Kurcin, 160 Or App 489, 494 , 981 P2d 1277 (1999). We allowed claimant’s petition for review. We reverse the decision of the Court of Appeals and affirm the Board’s order. … The Court of Appeals concluded that “[w]hether to grant a continuance is a matter committed to the discretion of the Board.” SAIF v. Kurcin, 160 Or App at 492 .

Real Estate Loan Fund Oreg. Ltd. v. Hevner

76 Or. App. 349 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Nov 14, 1985

Kabil Developments Corp. v. Mignot, 279 Or 151, 156 , 566 P2d 505 (1977); Harty v. Bye, 258 Or 398, 403 , 483 P2d 458 (1971). In Kitzke v. … In Minniti v.

Harwell v. Argonaut Insurance

296 Or. 505 · Oregon Supreme Court · Mar 6, 1984

We allowed review because the “Court of Appeals may have affirmed the Board as the result of an erroneous interpretation of the law.” Gettman v. … On the other hand, the referee, the Board, or the Court of Appeals could not be faulted if they read our cases of Walker v. Compensation Department, supra, and Wilson v. State Ind. Acc.

Zollinger v. Frear

32 Or. App. 385 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Feb 7, 1978

Phillips v. Layman, 15 Or App 107, 109 , 514 P2d 1352 (1973), rev den (1974). Cf., School Dist. No. 1, Mult. Co. v. Nilsen, 262 Or 559, 572 , 499 P2d 1309 (1972); Bay River v. Envir. … ORS 19.010; City of Hermiston v. ERB, 280 Or 291 , 570 P2d 663 (1977); McEwen et ux v. McEwen et al, 203 Or 460 , 280 P2d 402 (1955); Robertson v. Henderson, 181 Or 200 , 179 P2d 742 (1947).

South Benton Education Ass'n v. Monroe Union High School District 1

83 Or. App. 425 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jan 28, 1987

Kelly, 275 Or 585, 593 , 552 P2d 1301 (1976), quoting United Packinghouse Workers v. … Davis v. Wasco IED, 286 Or 261, 272 , 593 P2d 1152 (1979); Thompson v. IDS Life Insurance Co., 274 Or 649, 656 , 549 P2d 510 (1976); State v. Warner, 52 Or App 987, 992 , 630 P2d 385 , rev den 291 Or 662 (1981).

Mize v. Comcast Corp-AT & T Broadband

208 Or. App. 563 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Oct 11, 2006

Rather, the board reasoned that, “for purposes of ORS 656.005(7)(a), a ‘material cause’ is a substantial cause, something more than minimal. See Van Blokland v. … Claimant did not appeal the ALJ’s ruling upholding the denial of the aggravation claim to the board. Cf. State v.

Schleiss v. SAIF Corp.

354 Or. 637 · Oregon Supreme Court · Dec 27, 2013

Smothers v. … Barrett v.

State v. Middleton

256 Or. App. 173 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Apr 17, 2013

Id.; State v. … State v.

Reudiger v. United States Forest Service

427 F. Supp. 2d 975 · District Court, D. Oregon · Jul 6, 2005

On February 13, 1998, FGS filed the Oregon Dutch Timber Harvest Plan (“THP”) with the State of California, in conformance with California’s Forest Practice Act and Board of Forestry regulations. AR 1371. … Deck of Brown, ¶ 9,10. II.

Sherman v. Reilly

364 F. Supp. 2d 1216 · District Court, D. Oregon · Apr 4, 2005

Sherman failed to exhaust his administrative remedies because he failed to appeal to the Parole Commission’s National Appeals Board. Mr. … Brown v. Rison, 895 F.2d 533, 535 (9th Cir.1990). This court need not delve into the issue of whether Mr. Sherman exhausted his administrative remedies.

Crawford v. School District No. 7

68 Or. 388 · Oregon Supreme Court · Dec 30, 1913

In the case of Board of Education v. … In People v. Board of Education, 18 Mich. 409 , Mr.

Cayton v. Safelite Glass Corp.

232 Or. App. 454 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Dec 16, 2009

Employer responds that in Red Robin International v. … State v. Gaines, 346 Or 160, 171-72, 175 , 206 P3d 1042 (2009).

Morgan v. Stimson Lumber Co.

288 Or. 595 · Oregon Supreme Court · Feb 26, 1980

The Court of Appeals accepted this contention in holding that the Board had exceeded its rulemaking authority. The court quoted Ore. Newspaper Pub. v. … See Sahnow v. Fireman’s Fund Ins. Co., 260 Or 564 , 491 P2d 997 (1971). The Court of Appeals did not address that issue in invalidating the Board’s rule.