Opinion

State ex rel. Palacios v. Rea

  • 179 Or. App. 431
  • 39 P.3d 289
  • 2002 Ore. App. LEXIS 140
Court
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Filed
Feb 6, 2002
Status
Published
On the bench
Haselton, Linder, Wollheim
Cited by
1 cases
Authority
More cited than 47.3%

The opinion

PER CURIAM

Plaintiff appeals from the trial court’s dismissal of his petition for writ of mandamus. As part of its judgment, the court required plaintiff to pay filing fees of $167, which the trial court had initially deferred pursuant to ORS 21.605(1)(a). Plaintiff challenges both the dismissal and the imposition of filing fees. We reject without discussion plaintiffs arguments as to the merits of the dismissal. However, as defendant concedes, the judgment for filing fees was erroneous. See State ex rel Baker v. Cook, 171 Or App 719 , 16 P3d 1184 (2000).

Judgment for filing fees of $167 reversed; otherwise affirmed.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.