Case law

State v. Noble

109 Or. App. 46 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Dec 17, 1991

He relies on State v. … State v. Caraher, supra; see also State v.

Rivera v. Perlo Construction, LLC

336 Or. App. 307 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Nov 20, 2024

Brown. Before Aoyagi, Presiding Judge, Egan, Judge, and Kistler, Senior Judge.* ______________ * Egan, J., vice Jacquot, J. 308 Rivera v. Perlo Construction, LLC KISTLER, S. J. … See SAIF v.

Smith v. Smith

2 Or. App. 398 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Apr 9, 1970

In Brown v. … See also authorities cited in Brown v. Brown, supra. We are of the opinion that the same principles also control this case. Thus, it is not necessary for us to discuss the defendant’s other assignments of error.

Travelers Ins. Co. v. Arevalo (In re Comp. of Arevalo)

296 Or. App. 514 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Mar 13, 2019

Group v. Huff , 149 Or. App. 298 , 307, 942 P.2d 853 (1997) (rejecting argument that the board erred because it addressed the issue of attorney fees sua sponte ). Our decision in Braden v. SAIF , 187 Or. … PGE v. Bureau of Labor and Industries , 317 Or. 606 , 610, 859 P.2d 1143 (1993). We do that using the analytical framework set out in State v.

Okon v. Broadspire

348 Or. App. 1 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Mar 25, 2026

OAR 436-035-0007(5)(b); see also SAIF v. … In response, employer contends that the board’s reference to “unambiguous findings” is consistent with our case law. See Hicks v.

State v. Webber

181 Or. App. 229 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · May 8, 2002

State v. Stephens, 178 Or App 31, 38 , 35 P3d 1061 (2001). … In her written report, Brown reports that appellant said, “This was just a normal brother to brother fight, and that his family *239 overreacted.” Brown found that appellant “was fully oriented.”

State v. Chase

263 Or. App. 709 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jun 18, 2014

See State v. Brown, 310 Or 347, 355 , 800 P2d 259 (1990) (“The court generally must instruct on all essential elements of the crime charged.”). … See ORAP 5.45(1); Ailes v.

Alvarez v. SAIF

345 Or. App. 632 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Dec 17, 2025

Reviewing the board’s legal conclusions for errors of law, ORS 183.482(8)(a); Curry Educational Service Dist. v. … However, unlike in Greenbriar, the record supports the board’s finding that SAIF did not have 636 Alvarez v.

School District No. 68 v. Hoskins

194 Or. 301 · Oregon Supreme Court · Feb 14, 1952

Hall v. Dunn, 52 Or 475 , 97 P 811 , 25 LRA NS 193; Dayton v. Board of Equalization, 33 Or 131, 136 , 50 P 1009 ; Schirott v. … In Cookinham v.

State v. Palomo

256 Or. App. 498 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · May 8, 2013

State v. Davis, 254 Or App 387, 388 , 292 P3d 666 (2012). … See State v.

State v. Henley

281 Or. App. 825 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Oct 26, 2016

Brown, 297 Or 404 , 687 P2d 751 (1984), and State v. O’Key, 321 Or 285 , 899 P2d 663 (1995). … See State v.

Peters v. Johnson

124 Or. 237 · Oregon Supreme Court · Feb 2, 1928

His failure to comply with the statute in this respect constitutes negligence per se: Marshall v. Olson, 102 Or. 502 ( 202 Pac. 736 ); Emmons v. Southern Pac. Co., 97 Or. 263 ( 191 Pac. 333 ); Northwest Door Co. v. … J., and Bean and Brown, JJ., concur.

Kankkonen v. HENDRICKSON

232 Or. 49 · Oregon Supreme Court · Sep 6, 1962

State Land Board v. Gennies, 204 Or 443 , 283 P2d 655 (1955). The other is that “a thing once proved to exist continued as long as is usual with things of that nature.” ORS 41.360 (32). … Fink v. Prudential Insurance Co., 162 Or 37 , 90 P2d 762 (1939).

Liberty M & Saif Corp. v. Lynch Co. (In re Comp. of Alcorn)

295 Or. App. 809 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jan 30, 2019

Robinson v. SAIF , 147 Or. App. 157 , 160, 935 P.2d 454 (1996) ; McIntyre v. Standard Utility Contractors, Inc. , 135 Or. App. 298 , 301, 897 P.2d 1202 (1995) ; Mandell v. SAIF , 41 Or. … Hicks v. SAIF , 196 Or. App. 146 , 151, 100 P.3d 1129 (2004) (court will affirm the board's reasonable interpretation of the medical evidence supported by substantial evidence).

SAIF Corp. v. DeLeon

352 Or. 130 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jun 28, 2012

Insurer argues that, in Greenslitt v. … Co. v.

Balfour v. Portland & Asiatic S. S. Co.

167 F. 1010 · District Court, D. Oregon · Feb 8, 1909

The case of Nobel’s Explosives Co. v. Jenkins, L. R. 1896, 2 Q. B. 326, cited by the Supreme Court, is also quite analogous. … But this argument is disposed of by the cases of (Geipel v. Smith. L. R. 7 Q. B. 404, and Rodoconachi v. Elliott, L. R. 9 C. P. 518.

Seibel v. Liberty Homes, Inc.

305 Or. 362 · Oregon Supreme Court · Mar 29, 1988

Dehnart v. Waukesha Brewing Co., 21 Wis 2d 583 , 124 NW2d 664, 671 (1963). But compare, e.g., Rutzen v. Monroe Cty Long Term Care Program, 104 Misc. 2d 1000 , 429 NYS 2d 863, 865-66 (Sup Ct 1980), quoting Labor Board v. … Gullett Gin Co., 340 US 361, 364 , 71 S Ct 337 , 95 L Ed 337 (1951) (no offset for unemployment benefits); Brown v. A.J. Gerrard Mfg. Co., 715 F2d 1549 (11th Cir 1983); Green Forest Public Schools v.

State of Oregon v. Anderson

207 Or. 675 · Oregon Supreme Court · May 31, 1956

See, also, State v. Carothers, 1 Greene (Iowa) 464; People v. Neff, 191 NY 286 , 84 NE 63 . … Madden v. Crawford, 207 Or 76 , 295 P2d 174 ; State v. Brumfield, 104 Or 506 , 209 P 120 .

Miller v. SCHRUNK

232 Or. 383 · Oregon Supreme Court · Nov 7, 1962

Baker v. Steele, et al, 229 Or 498, 501 , 366 P2d 726 (1962). First, does the petition allege ultimate facts that the Board exceeded its jurisdiction? … The majority opinion in Safeway Stores v. State Bd. Agriculture, 198 Or 43, 53 , 255 P2d 564 (1953), and the dissent at 198 Or 103 , support City of Portland v. Garner, supra.

State Accident Insurance Fund Corp. v. Noffsinger

80 Or. App. 640 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Aug 13, 1986

The Board affirmed without elaboration. … In Stark v. State Industrial Acc.