Case law

State v. Patterson

68 Me. 473 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Nov 12, 1878

Hutchison v. Bowker, 5 Mee. & W. 535, 540. Smith v. Faulkner, 12 Gray, 251 , 255. Putnam v. Bond, 100 Mass. 58 . Cunningham v. Washburn, 119 Mass. 224 . Powers v. Cary, 64 Maine, 9, 21. … Primm v. Hazen, 27 Mo. 211 . Heft v. McGill, 3 Pa. St. 257. Reynolds v. Richards, 14 Pa. St. 208. Iasigi v. Brown, 17 How. 183 . Bolckow v. Seymour, 17 C. B. (N. S.) 107. The rule may be subject to other qualification.

Godfrey v. Haynes

74 Me. 96 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Aug 2, 1882

This action is brought for the board of the defendant and his-wife by the administratrix on the estate of his father-in-law. … Spring v. Hulett, 104 Mass. 591 ; Thurston v. Perry, 130 Mass. 240 . Exceptions overruled. Walton, Daneoetii, Viegin and Symonds, JJ., concurred..

Pierce v. Faunce

53 Me. 351 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jul 1, 1865

Adams v. Brown, 7 Cush., 220 . 1. … J., in Reed v.

Ex parte Paris

18 F. Cas. 1104 · U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Maine · Oct 15, 1847

A different construction would require a double payment or allowance for board. … [Randolph v. Donaldson] 9 Cranch [13 U. S.] 76.

Michael F. Bailey v. City of Lewiston

2017 ME 160 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jul 20, 2017

Hird v. … See State v.

Roberts v. Stevens

17 L.R.A. 266 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Mar 10, 1892

In Brandon v. … See also Baker v. Brown, 146 Mass. 369 ; Sears v. Choate, 146 Mass. 395 , 398 ; Maynard v. Cleaves, 149 Mass. 307 , 308 ; Slatterly v. Wason, 151 Mass. 266 . To the same purport see also Smith v.

State v. Matheson

363 A.2d 716 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Sep 2, 1976

The appellant replied that he thought they could buy some brown mescaline if a certain individual was at a specified location. … Contra, Brown v. State, Del., 310 A.2d 870, 871 (1973); State v. Gilman , 110 R.I. 207, 222 , 291 A.2d 425, 434 (1972). 5 .

Pennell v. Card

96 Me. 392 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Apr 22, 1902

Minot v. Cumberland Co. Com., 28 Maine, 121. Section 19 of chapter 51, E. … Littlefield v. Boston & Maine Railroad, 65 Maine, 248. In the record of their judgment upon the petition of Enoch F.

State v. Nelson

714 A.2d 832 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jul 23, 1998

State v. Garrett, 1998 ME 7, ¶ 3 , 704 A.2d 393, 394 . … State v. Duval, 666 A.2d 496, 498 (Me.1995).

Good v. Berrie

123 Me. 266 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Nov 30, 1923

Schulte v. Halliday, 54 Mich., 73 . The last named case holds that the finding of the jury is conclusive. Note to Richie v. Walker, 63 Conn., 155 . In Richie v. … Brown v. Copley, 7 Mann. & Granger, 566; E. C. L., 566, by Caswell, J. Stickney v. Munroe, 44 Maine, 195; Goddard v. Grand Trunk Railway, 57 Maine, 202, and cases cited; Young v. Maine Central R. R. Co., 113 Maine, 118.

Johnson v. Johnson Bros.

108 Me. 272 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jul 14, 1911

In Shoe Co. v. … The following are some of the many cases in which this doctrine is affirmed: Bank v. Remsen, 43 Fed. 226 ; Bank v. Atkinson, 55 Fed. 465 ; Tod v. Land Co., 57 Fed. 47 ; Sav. Bank v. Shawnee Bank, 95 U. S. 557 ; Blake v.

Kelley v. Kelley

77 Me. 135 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Feb 17, 1885

Oliver v. Woodman, 66 Maine, 57, 58 ; Spofford v. True, 33 Maine, 291; Hale v. Brown, 59 N. H. 558. When wo come to consider the second suit, the plaintiff, John J. Kelley, stands in a more unfavorable light. … Keen, 115 Mass. 185 ; Brainard v. Shannon, 60 Maine, 344,) yet, from his own testimony, as was said by Danforth, J., in Baker v.

Hawes v. Smith

12 Me. 429 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jun 15, 1835

Buller J. in Browning v. Wright, 2 Bos. & Pull. 26. … In Kingman v.

Miller v. Marston

35 Me. 153 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jul 1, 1852

—The defendant, as keeper of a livery stable, claims a particular lien, by operation of law, upon the property replevied, for the board of the plaintiff’s mare in controversy. … Chapman v. Allen, Cro. Car. 271; the case of an Hostler, Yelv. 67, f. n. 1; Yorke v. Greenaugh, 2 Ld. Ray. 868; Bevan v. Waters, 3 Car. & Payne, 520; Jackson v. Cummins, 5 Mees. & Welsh. 342; Grinnell v.

Pearson v. Rolfe

76 Me. 380 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Aug 4, 1884

Wadsworth v. Smith, 11 Maine, 278 ; Brown v. Chadbourne, 31 Maine, 9; Treat v. Lord, 42 Maine, 552; Wood; Nuis. (2d ed.) § 463, and cases. … Dwinel v. Veazie, 44 Maine, 167. A log-owner is liable if he unnecessarily encumbers the pond of a mill-owner with his logs. The log-owner’s general right is that of passage, not of rest. Brown v. Black, 43 Maine, 443.

Eveleth v. Gill

97 Me. 315 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Feb 11, 1903

Thus it was said by this court in Treat v. … Pillsbury v. Brown, 82 Maine, 450, 9 L. R. A. 94. The variance here is wide and substantial.

Smith v. Yankee Construction Corp.

625 A.2d 904 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · May 28, 1993

In Diamond Int’l Corp. v. … Id. at 1048 (quoting Brown v. Prime Constr. Co., Inc., 102 Wash.2d 235 , 684 P.2d 73, 75 (1984)).

Smith v. Maine Central Railroad

114 Me. 474 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Mar 10, 1916

The plaintiff drove the cattle to the station and put them in the yard owned by the defendant that was used as temporary quarters for cattle, which was 32 x 38 feet, boarded tight *476 except one place where there were bars … Moore v. Stetson, 96 Maine, 203; Austin v. Baker, 112 Maine, 268. The only claimed defect in the yard is that the bars did not restrain the cattle. There was no guaranty upon the part of the defendant that they would.

Lunt v. Stimpson

73 Me. 245 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Mar 9, 1882

In Brown v.

Thayer v. Eastern Maine Medical Center

740 F. Supp. 2d 191 · District Court, D. Maine · Sep 23, 2010

See Marston v. … Robinson v.