Case law

NAES Corp. v. SCI 3.2, Inc.

303 Or. App. 684 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Apr 29, 2020

See also King v. … See, e.g., SAIF v.

State v. Lord

31 L.R.A. 473 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jan 27, 1896

Allen, J., in People v. Canal Board, 55 N. … Brown, 1 Swanst. 265; Attorney-General v. Mayor of Dublin, 1 Bligh (N. S.), 312; Attorney-General v. Eastlake, 45 Eng. Ch. 218-221.

Kellotat v. Cupp

78 Or. App. 61 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Feb 26, 1986

Under those circumstances we think the state should have a reasonable opportunity to conform its procedure to the new rule announced in Brown. We conclude, therefore, that State v. … Fair, supra, characterized its decision in State v. Brown, supra, as made under the Oregon Constitution.

State v. Kurokawa-Lasciak

237 Or. App. 492 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Sep 29, 2010

In the years since Brown and Kock , however, the courts have “refined the automobile exception analysis,” Coleman, 167 Or App at 92 , although “refined” is not universally accepted as the proper verb. See State v. … State v.

Billion v. Billion

137 Or. 622 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jul 16, 1931

On Petition eor Rehearing ( 3 P. (2d) 1113 ) BROWN, J. The defendant has filed a petition for a rehearing. For a statement of the issues made, see our original opinion. … We held in Hawley v. Hawley, 101 Or. 649 ( 199 P. 589 ), that divorce is prima facie prejudicial to the public interest, and that it is the policy of the state not to destroy, but to preserve, the status of marriage.

Barker v. Board of Parole and Post Prison Supervision

District Court, D. Oregon · Jan 28, 2020

See Thomas v. … .”); United States. v.

State v. Wm. Lester Schleigh

210 Or. 155 · Oregon Supreme Court · Apr 17, 1957

Brown saw vehicle tracks “where someone had come on to the road and then headed down the creek.” He saw no other red pickup. … In a second dissenting opinion Brown J. quoted with approval from People v.

State v. Fernandez

334 Or. App. 81 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jul 31, 2024

Or Laws 1989, ch 790, § 21; State v. … Id. at 192; see also State v.

Vanbebber v. Plunkett

27 L.R.A. 811 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jan 14, 1895

J., in Brown v. Oregon Lumber Company, 24 Or. 317 , 33 Pac. 557 , “is in the nature of a demurrer to the evidence; it admits not only all that the evidence proves, but all that it tends to prove. … Shattuck, J., in Tippin v.

Baker County v. Huntington

48 Or. 593 · Oregon Supreme Court · Dec 18, 1906

Brown,------ ---and -------hereby undertake that if the said A. H. … Rep. 372 ); Hall v. Parker, 39 Mich. 287 .

Saif Corp. v. Thompson

360 Or. 155 · Oregon Supreme Court · Aug 4, 2016

SAIF v. Thompson, 267 Or App 356, 340 P3d 163 (2014). … In Wright v.

Rogue Gem & Geology Club, Inc. v. Josephine County Assessor

17 Or. Tax 446 · Oregon Tax Court · Jun 10, 2003

Sue Brown, past-president of Plaintiff, appeared for Plaintiff. Michael Schneyder, Assessor, appeared for Defendant Department of Revenue (the department). … Methodist Homes, Inc. v. Tax Com., 226 Or 298, 308-09 , 360 P2d 293 (1961) (citing Behnke-Walker v. Multnomah County, 173 Or 510, 519 , 146 P2d 614 (1944)).

Dougherty v. Crabtree

812 F. Supp. 1089 · District Court, D. Oregon · May 8, 1991

of sentence; and that the recent case of United States v. … The Brown case has resolved that issue in Dougherty’s favor. United States v. Freeman does not require a different result.

Johnson v. Timber Structures, Inc.

203 Or. 670 · Oregon Supreme Court · Mar 30, 1955

Defendant relies on Brown v. Underwood Lumber Co., 172 Or 261 , 141 P2d 527 , and the Inwall and Atkinson cases, supra. All these cases can be distinguished. … In the Brown case, Brown, while scaling logs for the Warner Company, was killed when a log rolled off a truck as it was being loaded by the defendant Underwood Lumber Co.

Stufflebeam v. De Lashmutt

83 F. 449 · U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Oregon · Nov 18, 1897

assigned, to Brown. … In Waite v. Dowley, 94 U.

Miller v. Elisea

302 Or. App. 188 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Feb 12, 2020

Marcum v. Adventist Health System/West, 345 Or 237, 240, 193 P3d 1 (2008). Defendant did not dispute the professional qualifications of Brown and Freeman or the diagnosis of fibromyalgia. … The court described the considerations relevant to the admissibility of scientific evidence under OEC 401, 702, and 403, State v. Brown, 297 Or 404, 687 P2d 751 (1984), and State v.

Anderson and Abbett

345 Or. App. 664 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Dec 17, 2025

Brown, 259 Or App at 627. … See State v.

Foundation of Human Understanding v. Masters

313 Or. App. 119 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jul 8, 2021

Williams v. … Regardless of David’s belief as to Roy’s capacity, he acknowledged that the removal was undertaken by him and Mark as “the Board,” not as Successor Founder. 126 Foundation of Human Understanding v.

Stellar J Corp. v. Smith & Loveless, Inc.

749 F. Supp. 2d 1137 · District Court, D. Oregon · Aug 5, 2010

ORDER BROWN, District Judge. … See also United States v. Reynar-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir.2003) (en banc); United States v.

State v. Stafford

184 Or. App. 674 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Nov 6, 2002

State v. Dixon / Digby, 307 Or 195, 211-12 , 766 P2d 1015 (1988). … State v. Gabbard, 129 Or App 122, 126-27 , 877 P2d 1217 , rev den, 320 Or 131 (1994) (citing State v. Ohling, 70 Or App 249 , 688 P2d 1384 , rev den, 298 Or 334 (1989)).