Case law

Valent v. New Jersey State Board of Education

118 N.J. Super. 416 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Mar 8, 1972

On February 23, 1972 the Supreme Court of New Jersey entered an order in Preston v. Board of Education, Westfield, (Docket 0-272). Preston involved substantially the same issues as did the case at bar. … See Reinauer Really Corp. v. Paramus, 34 N. J. 406, 415 (1961).

Yakal-Kremski v. Denville Township Board of Education

329 N.J. Super. 567 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Apr 12, 2000

Ibid.; see also Kolczycki v. … See, e.g., Branigan v.

Paterson Milk & Cream Co. v. Milk Control Board

118 N.J.L. 383 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jul 7, 1937

Price fixing by a state milk control board was held constitutional in Nebbia v. New York, 291 U. S. 502 . It was settled in Trinityfarm Construction Co. v. … The milk control board was well within its rights in revoking prosecutor’s license for selling milk at a price less than that fixed by the board. The writ will be dismissed.

State Board of Medical Examiners v. Warren Hospital

104 N.J. Super. 409 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Feb 21, 1969

Board of Education v. Hartford Fire Ins. Co.

105 F. Supp. 697 · District Court, D. New Jersey · Mar 25, 1952

.) § 71; Victory Cabinet Co. v. Insurance Co. of North America, 7 Cir., 1950, 183 F.2d 360 . … The change accomplished by this legislation and the criteria to be utilized in its application have been discussed at length by the United States Supreme Court in American Fire & Casualty Co. v.

Oberti Ex Rel. Oberti v. Board of Education

789 F. Supp. 1322 · District Court, D. New Jersey · Apr 24, 1992

See Daniel R.R. v. State Board of Education, 874 F.2d 1036, 1050 (5th Cir.1989). 7 . We are impressed by the common sense of this preference for inclusion. Brown v. … Board of Education, Sacramento City Unified School District v.

MG v. Caldwell-West Caldwell Board of Education

804 F. Supp. 2d 305 · District Court, D. New Jersey · Jun 30, 2011

Plaintiffs quote Grieco v. N.J. … Brown v. Commonwealth of Pa., Dep’t of Health Emergency Med. Svcs. Training Inst., 318 F.3d 473, 482 (3d Cir.2003). Therefore, defendants are entitled to summary judgment on plaintiffs’ equal protection claim. VI.

Cooper v. State Board of Veterinary Medical Examiners

114 N.J.L. 10 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Nov 7, 1934

College of Mecca of Chiropractic v. State Board of Medical Examiners, 113 N. J. L. 327. In interpreting statutes the object should be to ascertain and give effect to the intention of the legislature. Clarkson v. … McCarthy v. Wallers, 107 Id. 223. It is the intention rather than the letter of the law that should prevail. Associates of Jersey Co. v. Davison, 29 Id. 415. The statutory construction should be reasonable. Hart v.

MACDONALD v. SABANDO

District Court, D. New Jersey · May 12, 2025

Defendant does not dispute this general right but notes only—citing Sammon v. New Jersey Board of Medical Examiners, 66 F.3d 639 (3d Cir. 1995) and Doe ex rel. Doe v. … (quoting Pickup v. Brown, 740 F.3d 1208, 1236 (9th Cir. 2014))).

BROWN v. SCHMIDT

District Court, D. New Jersey · Apr 13, 2021

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY CAMDEN VICINAGE KEISHAWN BROWN, … See Ashcroft v.

Cooper v. State Board of Veterinary Medical Examiners

115 N.J.L. 115 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · May 17, 1935

Meredith v. Mercer County Board of Chosen Freeholders

117 N.J. Super. 379 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Oct 1, 1970

See McDonald v. Board of Ghosen Freeholders, etc.,. 99 N. J. L. 393 (E. & A. 1924). MacPhail v. Board of Chosen Freeholders Hudson Cty., 6 N. J. … Clifton v. Zweir 36 N. J. 309, 323 (1962).

State ex rel. Board of Education v. Sheridan

42 N.J.L. 64 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Feb 15, 1880

The strict construction and enforcement of our school laws have been adjudged in this court in State, Herder, pros., v. … Skirm, v. Cox, Collector, 9 Vroom 302 , holding that the board of assessors must apportion and distribute the school tax according to the duplicate of the present, and not the preceding year.

Board of Health v. Diamond Paper Mills Co.

64 N.J. Eq. 793 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Nov 17, 1902

BROWN v. EDWARDS

District Court, D. New Jersey · Jan 20, 2021

BROWN, : : Petitioner, : Civil Action No. … McFarland v. Scott, 512 U.S. 849, 856 (1994).

Sweeney v. Board of Review, Division of Employment Security

43 N.J. 535 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jan 12, 1965

The Legislature adopted an attitude of “neutrality,” i. e., that the fund may not be used, Febbi v. Board of Review, 35 N. J. 601, 606 (1961); Westinghouse Electric Corp. v. Board of Review, 25 N. … Board of Review, 8 N. J. Super. 71, 76 (App. Div. 1950); and the fact that there was a lockout rather than a strike is here of no moment. Mortensen v. Board of Review, 21 N. J. 242, 245-246 (1956); Schoenwiesner v.

BROWN v. SCHMIDT

District Court, D. New Jersey · Jan 6, 2021

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY CAMDEN VICINAGE KEISHAWN BROWN … Green v. Williamson, 241 F. App'x 820, 822 (3d Cir. 2007) (citing Meachum v. Fano, 427 U.S. 215, 224–25 (1976); Montanye v. Haymes, 427 U.S. 236, 242 (1976); Olim v.

State Ex Rel. Board of Health v. Jennings

131 N.J. Eq. 511 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Apr 5, 1942

Board of Health of Hackensack v. Board of Chosen Freeholders of Bergen County, 46 N. J. Eq. 173; affirmed, 48 N. J. Eq. 294. … A. &6:$-6S provides: “In case no nuisance shall be found to exist, costs shall be awarded against the local board which caused the suit to be brought only in case it shall appear to the chancellor that no probable cause existed

Hirsch v. New Jersey State Board of Medical Examiners

252 N.J. Super. 596 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Dec 20, 1991

Lefkowitz v. Turley, 414 U.S. 70, 76 , 94 S.Ct. 316, 322 , 38 L.Ed.2d 274, 281 (1973); Gillhaus Beverage Co., Inc. v. … In Spevack v.

DeLorenzo v. Board of Review, Div. of Employment SEC.

54 N.J. 361 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jul 1, 1969

The Appellate Division disagreed, and following Stauhs v. Bd. of Review, 93 N. J. Super. 451 (App. … As to the question *364 whether a mere failure to work because of illness constitutes a quit within the intent of this statute, the Board said: “The Board of Review does not now hold that a failure to report for work because