Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filters1915

10,000+ results

2.37s

  • Brian Pearson v. Tyler Eldridge

    2022 DNH 039 · District Court, D. New Hampshire · Mar 28, 2022

    Eldridge has moved for judgment on the pleadings based on qualified immunity. Because Eldridge has not established that qualified immunity shields him from suit, I deny the motion. I. … right was clearly established at the time of the challenged conduct.’”

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Hernandez Carrasquillo v. Rivera Rodriguez

    281 F. Supp. 2d 329 · District Court, D. Puerto Rico · Sep 2, 2003

    ; 2) if it does, was the constitutional right clearly established at the time of the facts alleged in the complaint? … Furthermore, we find that they may be enough to establish the reckless disregard of a clearly established constitutional right necessary to overcome Defendants’ qualified immunity.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Williams v. Bitner

    455 F.3d 186 · Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · Jul 25, 2006

    We are asked to determine whether, for the purposes of qualified immunity, the conduct alleged by Williams constituted a violation of his “clearly established” rights. … Long, 72 F.3d 70, 72-74 (8th Cir. 1995) (denying qualified immunity because Muslim inmates had a clearly established right not to be forced to handle pork); Kenner v.

    Cited 42 timesPublished
  • Trujillo v. City of Hobbs

    District Court, D. New Mexico · Jan 14, 2020

    In response, Trujillo contends Defendants frame the “clearly-established prong of the qualified immunity standard” using “self-serving” evidence and testimony provided by Officer Hopper, ignoring the legal mandate that … Under Garner and its progeny, the Court finds Trujillo has satisfied the second prong of the qualified immunity analysis: it was clearly established that a police officer may not shoot an unarmed man standing more than

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Solis v. Serrett

    31 F.4th 975 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Apr 21, 2022

    “Qualified immunity shields public officials sued in their individual capacities from liability for civil damages insofar as their conduct does not violate clearly established statutory or constitutional rights of which … “The qualified immunity inquiry includes two parts.

    Cited 60 timesPublished
  • McKally v. Perez

    87 F. Supp. 3d 1310 · District Court, S.D. Florida · Feb 6, 2015

    Once the affirmative defense of qualified immunity is asserted, “unless the plaintiffs allegations state a claim of violation of clearly established law, a defendant pleading qualified immunity is entitled to dismissal before … Alvereze, 498 Fed.Appx. 867, 872 (11th Cir.2012) (noting “a defense of qualified immunity may be addressed in a motion to dismiss, which will be granted if the complaint.fails to allege the violation of a clearly established

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • Fann v. Brailey

    841 S.W.2d 833 · Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Jul 2, 1992

    The Harlow court established an objective test to determine whether the state official enjoyed the qualified immunity: [Government officials performing discretionary functions generally are shielded from liability for civil … have a clearly established right not to have information about her prior involvement with the law revealed to the public?”

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • Henry v. Purnell

    619 F.3d 323 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Sep 24, 2010

    immunity defense based on whether the law is “clearly established” is a separate and required judicial action. 12 *337 The contours of that qualified immunity inquiry were laid out in Saucier. … Second, we have found no support for the proposition that a dissent may propound clearly established law for purposes of determining qualified immunity.

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • Tolliver v. Jordan

    District Court, S.D. New York · Jul 1, 2021

    Accordingly, on the facts before it, the Court cannot conclude that Defendants are entitled to qualified immunity. See, e.g., Hernandez v. Goord, 312 F. … Supp. 2d 537, 548-49 (S.D.N.Y. 2004) (defendants’ alleged improperly-motivated prison transfers in retaliation for inmate’s exercise of his First Amendment rights violated clearly established law, making qualified immunity

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Byrd v. Middletown Board of Education

    District Court, D. Connecticut · Nov 22, 2024

    Qualified immunity, however, can shield “employees from civil liability under §1983 if either (1) their conduct did not violate clearly established rights of which a reasonable person would have known, or (2) it was objectively … Defendants argue that because there is an “open question” as to the standard that applies to such speech, there is no “clearly established right,” and qualified immunity is warranted for Dr. Vázquez Matos.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Bell v. Luna

    856 F. Supp. 2d 388 · District Court, D. Connecticut · Mar 1, 2012

    . § 1983 , and that they should in any case be granted qualified immunity, as Mr. Bell’s allegedly infringed rights were not ones clearly established at the time the actions took place. … The Second Circuit has not decided whether an unpublished summary order can serve to "clearly establish” the law for qualified immunity purposes. See David R.

    Cited 15 timesPublished
  • Baar v. Jefferson County Board of Education

    686 F. Supp. 2d 699 · District Court, W.D. Kentucky · Feb 19, 2010

    As the Sixth Circuit explained, “[u]nder this judicially created exception, government officials are immune from civil liability when acting in an official capacity if their actions do not violate ‘clearly established statutory … These two recent cases do not give clearly established guidance in our circumstances.

    Cited 15 timesPublished
  • Woosley v. City of Paris

    591 F. Supp. 2d 913 · District Court, E.D. Kentucky · Dec 4, 2008

    clearly established constitutional law. … Plaintiff has failed to establish that Cornett violated any clearly established right which belonged to him on these grounds.

    Cited 19 timesPublished
  • Boggs v. Pearson

    2021 S.D. 44 · South Dakota Supreme Court · Jul 28, 2021

    “Qualified immunity shields a government official from liability and the burdens of litigation in a § 1983 action for damages unless the official’s conduct violated a clearly established constitutional or statutory right … immunity because it was not clearly established that their actions were unlawful.”

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Nowak v. Szwedo

    704 F. Supp. 153 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Jan 11, 1989

    qualified immunity. … Defendants claim that qualified immunity relieves them of liability because at the time of their alleged actions there was no established case law upholding a First Amendment claim for retaliation as petty and far removed

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Talley v. Brentwood Union Free School District

    728 F. Supp. 2d 226 · District Court, E.D. New York · Aug 4, 2010

    Qualified Immunity in General “Qualified immunity shields government officials performing discretionary functions ‘from liability for civil damages insofar as their conduct does not violate clearly established statutory or … “[E]ven where the law is ‘clearly established’ and the scope of an official’s permissible conduct is ‘clearly defined,’ the qualified immunity defense also protects an official if it was ‘objectively reasonable’ for him at

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • J.H. v. West Virginia Division of Rehabilitation Services

    224 W. Va. 147 · West Virginia Supreme Court · Jul 27, 2009

    Va.Code, 29-12A-1, et seq., 11 is entitled to qualified immunity from personal liability for official acts if the involved conduct did not violate clearly established laws of which a reasonable official would have known. … Unless the plaintiff’s allegations state a claim of violation of clearly established law, a defendant pleading immunity is entitled to dismissal before the commencement of discovery.”

    Abrogated by West Virginia Regional Jail & Correctional Facility Authority v. A.B., 234 W. Va. 492 (2014)Cited 10 timesPublished
  • Joshua Paul English v. Officer Jonathan Fowler

    75 F.4th 1151 · Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · Jul 27, 2023

    They argued that they are entitled to qualified immunity from the claim of ex- cessive force. … that violated clearly established law.”

    Cited 29 timesPublished
  • Livant v. Clifton

    334 F. Supp. 2d 321 · District Court, E.D. New York · Sep 7, 2004

    Qualified Immunity Qualified immunity is a three step analysis. Wilson v. Layne, 526 U.S. 603, 609 , 119 S.Ct. 1692 , 143 L.Ed.2d 818 (1999). … Then, [the Court] consider[s] if the violated right was clearly established at the time of the conduct. Finally, if plaintiff had a clearly established, constitutionally protected right that was violated ...

    Cited 14 timesPublished
  • Anthony Gibson v. Jeffrey Kilpatrick

    773 F.3d 661 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Dec 11, 2014

    was clearly established. … Qualified Immunity A.

    Cited 74 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.