Case law

Lee Lumber And Building Material Corp. v. National Labor Relations Board

117 F.3d 1454 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jul 8, 1997

Ass'n v. DOT, 105 F.3d 702, 705 (D.C.Cir.1997) (citing NLRB v. … But see NLRB v.

Fox River Neighborhood Ass'n v. Surface Transportation Board

5 F. App'x 1 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Feb 23, 2001

JUDGMENT This petition for review was considered on the record from the Surface Transportation Board (STB) and on the briefs of counsel. … See Birt v. Surface Transportation Board, 90 F.3d 580, 588-89 (D.C.Cir.1996).

United States v. Matthews

58 F. Supp. 3d 115 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 30, 2014

With regard to defendant Dawayne Brown, one § 924(c) charge remains (Count 17). … See Goode v.

Citizens Against Legalized Gambling v. District of Columbia Board of Elections & Ethics

501 F. Supp. 786 · District Court, District of Columbia · Oct 7, 1980

See, e. g., Illinois State Board of Elections v. Socialist Workers Party, 440 U.S. 173 , 99 S.Ct. 983 , 59 L.Ed.2d 230 (1979); Anderson v. … Illinois State Board of Elections v. Socialist Workers Party, supra, 440 U.S. at 184-85 , 99 S.Ct. at 990—91; Moore v.

United Steelworkers of America, Afl-Cio v. National Labor Relations Board

386 F.2d 981 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Oct 24, 1967

NLRB v. Greater New York Broadcasting Corp., 147 F.2d 337, 338 (2d Cir. 1945); NLRB v. Standard Oil Corp., 138 F.2d 885, 889 (2d Cir. 1943) (per L. Hand, J.). … Universal Camera Corp. v. NLRB, 340 U.S. 474 , 71 S.Ct. 456 , 95 L.Ed. 456 .

W. W. Chambers Company, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board

279 F.2d 817 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 16, 1960

Chambers Co., Inc. asks us to set aside, and the National Labor Relations Board asks us to enforce, an order of the Board. … The Board has jurisdiction because the Company’s undertaking business is “within the District of Columbia”. 29 U.S.C.A. § 152 (6).

Expert Electric, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board

258 F. App'x 335 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Nov 27, 2007

Such a determination is “largely a matter for the Board’s expertise.” NLRB v. Cauthorne, 691 F.2d 1023 , 1026 n. 5 (D.C.Cir.1982). … The Board has held delays shorter than four months to be unlawful, e.g., Crittenton Hosp., 343 NLRB 717 , 745 (2004), and we defer to its judgment here, Truck Drivers Local No. 705 v.

Lonon v. Board of Directors of Fairfax Village Condominium IV Unit Owners Ass'n

535 A.2d 1386 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jan 29, 1988

The expression “by suit brought in the name of the Board of Directors” does not obviously contemplate the self-help method of direct foreclosure sales arranged by the board itself. … See Scott v. District of Columbia, 493 A.2d 319, 323 (D.C.1985); Autocomp Inc. v. Publishing Computer Service, Inc., 331 A.2d 338, 340 (D.C.1975).

Inner City Press v. Board of Governors of Federal Reserve System

130 F.3d 1088 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Dec 12, 1997

See, e.g., Syno- vus Financial Corp. v. Board of Governors, 952 F.2d 426, 432 (D.C. … See United Food and Commercial Workers Union Local 751 v. Brown Group, Inc., 116 S.

Citizens Ass'n of Georgetown, Inc. v. District of Columbia Board of Zoning Adjustment

337 A.2d 495 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · May 7, 1975

HARRIS, Associate Judge: Petitioner challenges the issuance by the District of Columbia Board of Zoning Adjustment (BZA) of a certificate of oc *496 cupancy to intervenors for the operation of a restaurant and carry-out, … D.C.Code 1973, § 5-420 states: “The Board of Adjustment shall not have the power to amend any regulation or map.”

Teamsters, Chauffeurs & Helpers Local No. 79 v. National Labor Relations Board

325 F.2d 1011 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Dec 5, 1963

V-C picket line, but solely to continue their business dealings with V-C. … Board must be denied.

Independent Insurance Agents of America, Inc. v. Board of Governors

835 F.2d 1452 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Dec 29, 1987

Board of Governors, 468 U.S. 207 , 104 S.Ct. 3003 , 82 L.Ed.2d 158 (1984); Association of Data Processing, Inc. v. Board of Governors, 745 F.2d 677 (D.C.Cir.1984). … Eagle-Picher Indus, v. EPA, 759 *361 F.2d 922, 929 n. 11 (D.C.Cir.1985) (quoting Montgomery Charter Serv., Inc. v.

Sheet Metal Workers' International Ass'n v. National Labor Relations Board

989 F.2d 515 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Apr 6, 1993

See LTV Electrosystems, Inc. v. NLRB, 408 F.2d 1122, 1127 (4th Cir. 1969); United States v. International Longshoremen’s Ass’n, 337 F.Supp. 381 (S.D.N.Y.1971); United States v. … The Board’s findings are conclusive if they are supported by substantial evidence and we give “substantial deference to inferences drawn from the facts.” Avecor, Inc. v.

Investment Company Institute v. Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System

551 F.2d 1270 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jan 14, 1977

See Brief for Respondent Board of Governors at 46 n. 17, National Courier Ass’n v. Board of Governors, 170 U.S.App.D.C. 301 , 516 F.2d 1229 (1975). … Agents v. Board of Governors, supra, 160 U.S.App.D.C. at 145-146 , 489 F.2d at 1270-71 . See also Alabama Ass’n of Ins. Agents v.

Andrew Hofer v. Alan K. Campbell, Chairman, U. S. Civil Service Commission

581 F.2d 975 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Aug 18, 1978

In Richardson v. … . § 1981 , and the Fifth Amendment (emphasis added),” this court held, citing Brown v.

Retail Store Employees Union Local 880 v. National Labor Relations Board

419 F.2d 329 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jul 10, 1969

Atlantic Seaboard Refining Co. v. FPC, 131 U.S.App.D.C. 291 , 404 F.2d 1268 (1968). Here the Board drew a distinction, as will appear below, between the cases of Woe and Grund. . Quotation from Lorain Journal Co. v. … We think the Board was well within its discretion. See, e. g., Packard Motor Car Co. v. NLRB, 330 U.S. 485, 491 , 67 S.Ct. 789 , 91 L.Ed. 1040 (1947) ; S. D. Warren Co. v.

Humiston v. Voorhees

23 F.2d 765 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Dec 5, 1927

On appeal, the decision of the board was affirmed. … Lindmark v. Hodgkinson, 31 App. D. C. 612; Kirby v. Clements, 44 App. D. C. 12; Brown v. Tomlinson, 49 App. D. C. 310, 265 F. 460 ; Scott v. Longtin, 52 App. D. C. 102, 281 F. 606 ; In re Levy, 55 App. D.

Dockery v. United States

385 A.2d 767 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Apr 26, 1978

They were standing on the northeast corner of 29th and 0 Streets when they observed two individuals dressed in jeans, one of whom was wearing a brown scarf and carrying a straw bag. … Stephenson v. United States, D.C.App., 296 A.2d 606 (1972).

2447 Good Hope Road, Inc. v. District of Columbia Alcoholic Beverage Control Board

295 A.2d 513 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Oct 2, 1972

Citizens Associations of Georgetown, Inc. v. District of Columbia Alcoholic Beverage Control Board, D.C.App., 280 A.2d 309, 311 (1971) (footnote omitted). See also Sophia’s Incorporated v. … V, 1972)). See D.C.Code 1967, § 25-106, and D.C.Code 1967, § 25-118 (Supp. V, 1972). . The validity of the Board’s order dated February 19, 1971, was the subject of another appeal to this court. In Byrd v.

Hyman v. Helvering

71 F.2d 342 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · May 7, 1934

In reaching our conclusion, we have examined the cases of Hill v. Commissioner (C. C. A. 4) 66 F.(2d) 45 ; Commissioner v. Brown (C. C. A. 7) 69 F.(2id) 602, decided March 22, 1984; Robinson v. Commissioner (C. C. … As to those after 1926, the Board having decided such payments were in the peculiar facts shown capital transactions, the court sustained the Board on the ground there was substantial evidence on which the Board’s decision