Case law

In Re Feigenbaum

951 A.2d 754 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jun 26, 2008

See In re Brown, 797 A.2d 1232 (D.C.2002) (A reciprocal discipline of five-year suspension with fitness condition was imposed based on a California resignation with charges pending.). *757 Since no exception has been taken … As we find support in the record for the Board’s findings, we accept them, and adopt the sanction that the Board recommended.

PPG Industries, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board

460 F. App'x 1 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Mar 30, 2012

Wayneview Care Center v. NLRB, 664 F.3d 341, 348 (D.C.Cir.2011) (citation omitted); see also 29 U.S.C. § 160 (f). … Crowley Marine Services, Inc. v. NLRB, 234 F.3d 1295, 1297 (D.C.Cir.2000) (per curiam) (citation omitted).

Ozburn-Hessey Logistics, LLC v. National Labor Relations Board

689 F. App'x 639 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Dec 30, 2016

See Wright Line, 251 N.L.R.B. 1083 , 1089 (1980); see also Chevron Mining, Inc. v. NLRB, 684 F.3d 1318, 1326-28 (D.C. Cir. 2012). … See Fort Dearborn Co. v. NLRB, 827 F.3d 1067, 1072 (D.C. Cir. 2016).

Board of Trustees of Unite Here Local 25 v. MR Watergate LLC

677 F. Supp. 2d 229 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jan 6, 2010

Plaintiff Board of Trustees of Unite Here Local 25 and Hotel Association of Washington, D.C. … See id. at 1325 (citing Travis v. Harris Corp., 565 F.2d 443, 446 (7th Cir.1977)).

International Ladies' Garment Workers Union v. National Labor Relations Board

414 F.2d 1214 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jul 18, 1969

the[ir] unlawful effect * * *." 6 Compare Retail Store Employees Union Local 880 v. … N.L.R.B. v. Gissel Packing Co., Inc., et al., 395 U.S. 575 , 89 S.Ct. 1918 , 23 L.Ed. 2d 547 , Sinclair Company v. N.L.R.B., 395 U.S. 575 , 89 S.Ct. 1918 , 23 L.Ed.2d 547 (1969). . Id. at 615 , at 1940 of 89 S.Ct. .

Food Store Employees Union, Local 347 v. National Labor Relations Board

422 F.2d 685 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 3, 1969

In exercising this judgment the Board owed no deference to its trial examiner. Cf. Universal Camera Corp. v. NLRB, 340 U.S. 474, 494-496 , 71 S.Ct. 456 , 95 L.Ed. 456 (1951); Oil, Chemical & Atomic Workers v. … Workers v. NLRB, 111 U.S.App.D.C. 383 , 389, 298 F.2d 297 , 303 (1961) cert. denied, Gulf Bottlers Inc. v. NLRB, 369 U.S. 843 , 82 S.Ct. 875 , 7 L.Ed.2d 847 , (1962); see also NLRB v.

Waste Management of Maryland, Inc. v. District of Columbia Board of Zoning Adjustment

775 A.2d 1117 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jul 5, 2001

as may be provided by the Board. 11 D.C.M.R. § 3315.2 (emphasis added). … The requirement set forth in this rule that an appeal be timely is jurisdictional; hence we have said that “if the appeal was not timely filed, the Board was without power to consider it.” Goto v.

National Black Police Ass'n v. District of Columbia Board of Elections & Ethics

924 F. Supp. 270 · District Court, District of Columbia · Apr 18, 1996

The resulting opinion denying the motion is published at National Black Police Association v. District of Columbia Board of Elections and Ethics, 858 F.Supp. 251 (D.D.C. 1994). … V. OTHER PROVISIONS OF INITIATIVE 41 Three substantial portions of Initiative 41 were not addressed in the parties’ evidence or arguments. The first is the applicability of the cap to Board of Education races.

Mi Pueblo Foods v. National Labor Relations Board

453 F. App'x 1 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Dec 27, 2011

The Board “need only select an appropriate unit, not the most appropriate unit.” Cleveland Const., Inc. v. NLRB, 44 F.3d 1010, 1013 (D.C.Cir.1995) (emphasis added). … The Court will uphold a bargaining-unit determination so long as the Board’s conclusions are “consistent with its precedent” and its factual findings are “supported by substantial evidence.” RC Aluminum Indus. v.

Intl Assn Mchnts 64 v. NLRB

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Dec 12, 1997

("the Board") alleg- ing bad faith bargaining by Brown & Sharpe Manufacturing Co. … The Board ruled that in order to show fraudulent concealment, IAM had to show an affirmative act of conceal- ment. See Brown & Sharpe Mfg. Co., 321 N.L.R.B. at 924 (citing Richards v. Mileski, 662 F.2d 65, 70 (D.C.

Fox River Neighborhood Ass'n v. Surface Transportation Board

5 F. App'x 1 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Feb 23, 2001

JUDGMENT This petition for review was considered on the record from the Surface Transportation Board (STB) and on the briefs of counsel. … See Birt v. Surface Transportation Board, 90 F.3d 580, 588-89 (D.C.Cir.1996).

United States v. Matthews

58 F. Supp. 3d 115 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 30, 2014

With regard to defendant Dawayne Brown, one § 924(c) charge remains (Count 17). … See Goode v.

Citizens Against Legalized Gambling v. District of Columbia Board of Elections & Ethics

501 F. Supp. 786 · District Court, District of Columbia · Oct 7, 1980

See, e. g., Illinois State Board of Elections v. Socialist Workers Party, 440 U.S. 173 , 99 S.Ct. 983 , 59 L.Ed.2d 230 (1979); Anderson v. … Illinois State Board of Elections v. Socialist Workers Party, supra, 440 U.S. at 184-85 , 99 S.Ct. at 990—91; Moore v.

United Steelworkers of America, Afl-Cio v. National Labor Relations Board

386 F.2d 981 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Oct 24, 1967

NLRB v. Greater New York Broadcasting Corp., 147 F.2d 337, 338 (2d Cir. 1945); NLRB v. Standard Oil Corp., 138 F.2d 885, 889 (2d Cir. 1943) (per L. Hand, J.). … Universal Camera Corp. v. NLRB, 340 U.S. 474 , 71 S.Ct. 456 , 95 L.Ed. 456 .

Richardson v. Wiley

569 F.2d 140 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Dec 22, 1977

Brown v. GSA, 425 U.S. 820, 835 , 96 S.Ct. 1961, 1969 , 48 L.Ed.2d 402 (1976). … See Brown v. GSA, supra, at 833-34, 96 S.Ct. 1961 . On May 7, 1975 Richardson received the April 25, 1975 decision which was prominently titled “Notice of Final Decision of Agency.”

Lonon v. Board of Directors of Fairfax Village Condominium IV Unit Owners Ass'n

535 A.2d 1386 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jan 29, 1988

The expression “by suit brought in the name of the Board of Directors” does not obviously contemplate the self-help method of direct foreclosure sales arranged by the board itself. … See Scott v. District of Columbia, 493 A.2d 319, 323 (D.C.1985); Autocomp Inc. v. Publishing Computer Service, Inc., 331 A.2d 338, 340 (D.C.1975).

Citizens Ass'n of Georgetown, Inc. v. District of Columbia Alcoholic Beverage Control Board

359 A.2d 295 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jun 23, 1976

Reilly v. Ozzard, 33 N.J. 529 , 166 A.2d 360 (1960), and Schear v. … Alcoholic Beverage Control Board, D.C.App., 292 A.2d 807 , 809 n.3 (1972); Citizens Association of Georgetown v. D. C. Alcoholic Beverage Control Board, D.C.App., 288 A.2d 666 , 670 n.4 (1972).

Cohen v. Board of Trustees of the University of the District of Columbia

305 F.R.D. 10 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 7, 2014

Republic of Nigeria v. Ugwuonye, 901 F. … See, e.g., Inst. for Policy Studies, 246 F.R.D. at 386; Wilson v. Prudential Fin., 218 F.R.D. 1, 3–4 (D.D.C. 2003); Ramseur v. Barreto, 216 F.R.D. 180, 182–83 (D.D.C. 2003); Stephenson v. Cox, 223 F.

Inner City Press v. Board of Governors of Federal Reserve System

130 F.3d 1088 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Dec 12, 1997

See, e.g., Syno- vus Financial Corp. v. Board of Governors, 952 F.2d 426, 432 (D.C. … See United Food and Commercial Workers Union Local 751 v. Brown Group, Inc., 116 S.

Braxton v. National Capital Housing Authority

396 A.2d 215 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Dec 19, 1978

Roberson v. District of Columbia Board of Higher Edu *217 cation, D.C.App., 359 A.2d 28 , 31 n. 4 (1976) (Bd. of Higher Education not a suable entity) (dictum); Miller v. … See Brown v.