Case law

Dardenne v. Daniels

101 Okla. 201 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 11, 1924

It is to be observed the ward himself is the plaintiff, and it is so clearly alleged therein, although he proceeds by acting through his guardian. … Mann appointed and qualified as his guardian, said judgment adjudging said Abram Dardenne, Jr.t to be an incompetent person and appointing said guardian having been made on November 24, 1922.

Question Submitted by: Lyle R. Kelsey, Executive Director, Oklahoma Board of Medical Licensure & Supervision

2024 OK AG 3 · Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Feb 22, 2024

That section grants physician assistants a general authority to "prescribe drugs, including controlled medications in Schedules II through V[,]" but expressly qualifies in the next subsection that "[a] physician assistant … As the Oklahoma Supreme Court has made clear: "[w]here a matter is addressed by two statutes--one specific and the other general--the specific statute, which clearly includes the matter in controversy and prescribes a different

Glenn v. Payne

48 Okla. 196 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 15, 1915

Glenn, deceased, died January 22, 1909. (4) That Mary Kline Glenn was appointed and qualified as the administratrix in March, 1909. (5) That no summons in said action was served either in person or by publication upon J. … The new rule to which we refer, established in this state, is laid down in Boyes et al. v. Masters et al., 28 Okla. 409 , 114 Pac. 710 , 33 L. R. A. (N. S.) 576.

Kennedy v. State

528 P.2d 317 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Nov 7, 1974

Wilson, Sequoyah County Medical Examiner, was qualified as an expert witness. Dr. … Clearly, the facts in that decision and in the instant case are not analogous.

Jewell v. Territory of Oklahoma

4 Okla. 53 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 13, 1896

In its legal sense “malice” expresses the idea of a willingness to injure another, and when qualified by the word “aforethought” it implies that the act was done on a previous determination. … In endeavoring to answer this inquiry, it is important to keep in view certain rules, which reason and experience have established, as calculated to aid in the just interpretation of statutes.

Gilbert v. Citizens' Nat. Bank of Chickasha

61 Okla. 112 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 17, 1916

Clearly it was implied from the fact of the letters themselves that Potts had something to do with the transaction. … I would qualify it by saying that along with these bills of lading these letters were sent to them which have been introduced. asking that they be held in trust for us. Q.

Union Texas Petroleum, a Division of Allied Chemical Corp. v. Corporation Commission

651 P.2d 652 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 9, 1982

alleged that the prior orders of the Corporation Commission would demonstrate that the Mississippian formation constituted a single common source of supply in the region covered by the application and that the prior orders clearly … F., qualified as an expert without objection. He states Finding No. 5 in Corporation Commission’s previous order 134466, in his opinion, is generally applicable through all the units in this particular case.

Ohio Casualty Insurance Co. v. Todd

813 P.2d 508 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 11, 1991

Those classes of person clearly are dehors the protection affordable by the rationale underlying the law's restrictions on actionable claims against liquor suppliers. … These class members enjoy *520 statutory immunity grounded on the law's recognition of their impaired will. [28] Had the court announced the tavernkeeper's new broad liability to every drinking consumer, it would have established

In Re Martin's Estate

261 P.2d 603 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 29, 1953

Proponent tacitly admits that the evidence does not establish "(b)" but contends that the rule as a whole has no application to this case. … Talley did not qualify as a psychiatrist, but his testimony was to the effect that the testatrix was mentally unstable and incompetent at the time he saw her.

Roberts

District Court, N.D. Oklahoma · Sep 8, 2026

An employee may establish causation by showing that the adverse employment action occurred soon after the protected activity. Annett v. … Second, plaintiff has clearly alleged that Dr.

AL-KHOURI v. OKLAHOMA HEALTH CARE AUTHORITY

419 P.3d 366 · Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · Sep 29, 2017

Constantino , 936 F.2d 687, 689-91 (2d Cir. 1991) (holding providers have no property right to continued enrollment as a qualified Medicaid provider); Plaza Health Labs., Inc. v. … Section 5006 establishes the Oklahoma Health Care Authority, i.e. the state agency. 63 O.S.2011 § 5006(A). Section 5007 establishes the Oklahoma Health Care Authority Board and describes its powers and duties.

Opinion No. (2007)

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Aug 22, 2007

Establish new forms of accountability for schools; and 7. … Further, status as a charter school does not qualify as a suspect or quasi-suspect class. See City of Cleburne v.

Tate v. Browning-Ferris, Inc.

833 P.2d 1218 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 22, 1992

The Commission qualifies for this status because (1) this state has laws that make unlawful employment practices based upon race, color, religion, sex or national origin and (2) the agency may seek or grant relief from those … The EEOC is required by federal regulations to seek agreements with 706 Agencies to establish effective and integrated resolution procedures. 29 C.F.R. § 1601.13 (c).

Kellogg v. School District No. 10 Comanche Co.

13 Okla. 285 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 10, 1903

Much more clearly may this be done when the right of. the public officer of the state to interfere is not admitted or does not exist, and in such case, it would seem that a bill might properly be *301 brought in the name … The inhabitants qualified to vote at a school meeting shall have power “to designate by vote a site for the district school house.”

BEASON v. I. E. MILLER SERVICES, INC.

2019 OK 28 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Apr 23, 2019

¶19 In conclusion, special acts "create preferences and establish inequality." Reynolds , 1988 OK 88 , ¶ 19, 760 P.2d at 823 . … State , 8 which withdrew judicially-created sovereign immunity as a defense to a tort action in Oklahoma.

Aladdin Petroleum Corp. v. State ex rel. Commissioners of the Land Office

200 Okla. 134 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 17, 1948

And that it would so pass in Oklahoma Territory *140 was established by the decision in State of Oklahoma v. State of Texas, supra. … The contention that the quoted casé-is authority for the contention that to-convey the river bed as against the claim of the state thereto such conveyance must expressly include the bed in the grant is clearly unjustified

Phillips v. Rodgers

District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · May 31, 2022

establish that the claim is plausible.4 And while pro se pleadings are construed liberally and held to a less stringent standard than formal pleadings drafted by lawyers,5 the Court will not assume the role of advocate … Defendants also maintain that they are entitled to qualified immunity, barring any conceivable § 1983 claims alleged here.

Wirtz v. National Electric Co.

285 F. Supp. 30 · District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · May 20, 1968

A reading of the case does not support Plaintiff’s position. 3 The opinion does not qualify “delivery” and “property.” Thus it is safe to presume that these terms were used in their ordinary sense. … Clearly, delivery of the interstate shipment did not occur until after the employees had handled the goods.

Smokey's of Tulsa, Inc. v. American Honda Motor Co.

453 F. Supp. 1265 · District Court, E.D. Oklahoma · Jul 7, 1978

Defendant’s affidavit clearly establishes the following: 1. Honda Ltd. is a Japanese corporation engaged in the manufacture and sale in Japan of motorcycles. Arms length sales are made to American Honda. … Moreover, plaintiff “has the burden of establishing proper venue.” Grantham, supra, at 1184 ; Aro Manufacturing Co. v.

Jefferson v. Barnhart

209 F. Supp. 2d 1200 · District Court, N.D. Oklahoma · May 29, 2002

The Commissioner’s decision will be reversed when he/she uses the wrong legal standard or fails to clearly demonstrate reliance on the correct legal standards. Glass, 43 F.3d at 1395 . II. DISCUSSION A. … Plaintiff did, therefore, establish that she meets the first prong of Parts A and E of Listing 112.05.