Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

FiltersFL

10,000+ results

6.77s

  • Brown v. State

    954 So. 2d 1177 · District Court of Appeal of Florida · Apr 11, 2007

    See Orta v. … error in denying a defendant her or his right to be present at a critical stage or any proceeding is fundamental error, except in resentencing cases where only the “ministerial act” of sentence correction is required); Cook v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Brown v. FRANKLIN COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE

    36 So. 3d 799 · District Court of Appeal of Florida · May 21, 2010

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Cosmopolitan Ice Company

    150 Fla. 599 · Supreme Court of Florida · May 22, 1942

    Holman v. Klutho, 91 Fla. 853 , 109 So. 314 . The second amended declaration was not definite as to the age of the minor and the sections of the statute relied on. … BROWN, C. J., CHAPMAN, and THOMAS, JJ., concur.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Florida Dept. of Transp.

    39 So. 3d 322 · District Court of Appeal of Florida · Jul 27, 2010

    39 So.3d 322 (2010) BROWN v. FLORIDA DEPT. OF TRANSP. No. 1D09-2887. District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District. July 27, 2010. Decision Without Published Opinion Affirmed.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Brown v. State

    944 So. 2d 526 · District Court of Appeal of Florida · Dec 20, 2006

    This case is before us on remand from the Florida Supreme Court which quashed our earlier decision reported at Brown v. State, 912 So.2d 7 (Fla. 4th DCA 2005). … As for his fourth claim of error, in which Brown argued that the trial court erred in sentencing Brown as a habitual felony offender on *527 count three under Richardson v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Brown v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co.

    576 F. Supp. 2d 1328 · District Court, M.D. Florida · Aug 28, 2008

    Hoag v. … Griffin v.

    Reversed by Brown v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co., 611 F.3d 1324 (2010)Cited 12 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Fritch, Et Vir.

    113 Fla. 428 · Supreme Court of Florida · Jan 1, 1934

    The final decree was, as against the defendant, Brown, a party to the cause, conclusive of the purchaser’s right to be placed in possession of the mortgaged property as described in the pleadings and final decree. … See Hair v. Commercial Bank of Live Oak, 112 Fla. 499 , 152 Sou. Rep. 180 (opinion filed October 28, 1933, at the present term). Affirmed. Davis, C. J., and Ellis and Terrell, J. J., concur. Whitfield, P.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Brown v. State

    947 So. 2d 1193 · District Court of Appeal of Florida · Jan 24, 2007

    See Ragan v. State, 643 So.2d 1175 (Fla. 3d DCA 1994).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Brown v. FRANKLIN COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPT.

    25 So. 3d 1224 · District Court of Appeal of Florida · Jan 8, 2010

    25 So.3d 1224 (2010) BROWN v. FRANKLIN COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPT. No. 1D09-4903. District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District. January 8, 2010. Decision Without Published Opinion Dismissed.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Brown v. State

    940 So. 2d 500 · District Court of Appeal of Florida · Oct 18, 2006

    Yisrael v. State, 938 So.2d 546 (Fla. 4th DCA 2006). GUNTHER, KLEIN and MAY, JJ., concur.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Practice Management Associates, Inc. v. Brown

    536 So. 2d 1195 · District Court of Appeal of Florida · Jan 20, 1989

    We reverse the trial court’s order which dismissed the complaint of Practice Management Associates; Inc., for lack of personal jurisdiction over Jeffrey Brown. See Armaly v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Brown v. State

    941 So. 2d 1284 · District Court of Appeal of Florida · Nov 22, 2006

    See Robinson v. State, 373 So.2d 898, 902 (Fla.1979). GUNTHER, POLEN and SHAHOOD, JJ., concur.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Brown v. FLORIDA UNEMPLOYMENT APPEALS COM'N

    29 So. 3d 293 · District Court of Appeal of Florida · Feb 25, 2010

    29 So.3d 293 (2010) BROWN v. FLORIDA UNEMPLOYMENT APPEALS COM'N. No. 1D09-4960. District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District. February 25, 2010. Decision Without Published Opinion Affirmed.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • BROWN, SUAREZ & RIOS, PA v. Sandoval

    27 So. 3d 664 · District Court of Appeal of Florida · Feb 19, 2010

    27 So.3d 664 (2010) BROWN, SUAREZ & RIOS, P.A. v. SANDOVAL. No. 2D09-4479. District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District. February 19, 2010. Decision Without Published Opinion Certiorari denied.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Brown v. WACHOVIA BANK, NAT. ASS'N

    29 So. 3d 1132 · District Court of Appeal of Florida · Mar 17, 2010

    29 So.3d 1132 (2010) BROWN v. WACHOVIA BANK, NAT. ASS'N. No. 4D09-4095. District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District. March 17, 2010. Decision Without Published Opinion Affirmed.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Brown v. State

    931 So. 2d 966 · District Court of Appeal of Florida · May 17, 2006

    See Roberson v. State, 841 So.2d 490 (Fla. 4th DCA 2003); Freeman v. State, 787 So.2d 152 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001). WARNER, GROSS and HAZOURI, JJ., concur.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Brown v. City of Ft. Lauderdale

    18 So. 3d 542 · District Court of Appeal of Florida · Oct 20, 2009

    18 So.3d 542 (2009) BROWN v. CITY OF FT. LAUDERDALE. No. 4D08-3501. District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District. October 20, 2009. Decision without published opinion Affirmed.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Brown v. State

    928 So. 2d 462 · District Court of Appeal of Florida · May 2, 2006

    See State v. McBride, 848 So.2d 287, 290 (stating that law of the case doctrine applies when the issues are decided on appeal). PLEUS, C.J., THOMPSON and SAWAYA, JJ., concur.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Brown v. State

    929 So. 2d 684 · District Court of Appeal of Florida · May 19, 2006

    We affirm Antwan Brown’s appeal of his judgment and sentence entered after he pleaded guilty. … Any motion should not be deemed successive based upon the circuit court’s denial of Brown’s pro se motion to correct illegal sentence. See Schrader v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Club & Community Consulting Corp. v. Brown

    728 So. 2d 822 · District Court of Appeal of Florida · Mar 24, 1999

    Brown was the defendant, along with his employer Maekey/Krumm Ventures, Incorporated (“Maekey/Krumm”). Brown was the building manager for a building owned by Sanctuary Centre, Ltd. … The trial court, in the Sanctuary litigation, made the following findings of fact regarding the meeting between Brown and Weilhouwer: (1) Brown and Weilhouwer had a meeting, (2) At all times material, Brown acted within the

    Cited 4 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.