Opinion

Brown v. State

  • 944 So. 2d 526
  • 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 21275
  • 2006 WL 3734141
Court
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Filed
Dec 20, 2006
Status
Published
On the bench
Gunther, Stevenson, Stone
Cited by
0 cases
Authority
More cited than 1.1%

The opinion

ON REMAND FROM THE FLORIDA SUPREME COURT

PER CURIAM.

This case is before us on remand from the Florida Supreme Court which quashed our earlier decision reported at Brown v. State, 912 So.2d 7 (Fla. 4th DCA 2005). We vacate our opinion issued on March 9, 2005 and replace it with the following opinion.

The appellant, Morris Brown, appeals his convictions and sentences on three counts of attempted first degree murder. We affirm, without comment, on each of the first three claims of error. As for his fourth claim of error, in which Brown argued that the trial court erred in sentencing Brown as a habitual felony offender on *527 count three under Richardson v. State, 884 So.2d 950 (Fla. 4th DCA 2003), we conclude that the trial court did not err in denying relief on this claim. Based on State v. Richardson, 915 So.2d 86 (Fla.2005), we affirm Brown’s sentence as a habitual felony offender for the third count of attempted first degree murder.

Affirmed.

STEVENSON, C.J., GUNTHER and STONE, JJ., concur.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.