Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
1.52s
Board of Education of the Borough of Englewood Cliffs v. Board of Education of the City of Englewood
132 N.J. 327 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jun 9, 1993
We are satisfied that such a study is authorized under the broad powers vested in the State Board of Education. … As the Appellate Division noted, “[I]t is hard for us to imagine any reasonable person challenging the power of the Board to ‘study’ an issue committed to its overall authority.” Id. at 482, 608 A.2d 914 .
Cited 23 timesPublishedWeymouth Township Board of Education v. Wolf
178 N.J. Super. 481 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Feb 26, 1981
Plaintiff alleges that it was defamed by reason of certain remarks published by defendants, the substance of which indicates that the board misused, lost or possibly embezzled substantial school board funds. … State v. Time, Inc., supra; Reilly v. Curtiss, 83 N.J.L. 77 (Sup.Ct.1912). It is the conclusion of the court, therefore, that the principles outlined in Chicago v.
Cited 2 timesPublishedRichardson v. Board of Trustees, Police & Firemen's Retirement System
192 N.J. 189 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jul 24, 2007
R & R Mktg., L.L.C. v. Brown-Forman Corp., 158 N.J. 170, 175 , 729 A.2d 1 (1999) (quoting Smith v. Dir., Div. of Taxation, 108 N.J. 19, 25 , 527 A.2d 843 (1987)). … In 1988, we applied the Kane standard in the companion cases of Maynard, v. Board of Trustees, Teachers’ Pension & Annuity Fund, 113 N.J. 169 , 549 A.2d 1213 (1988), and Ciecwisz v.
Cited 277 timesPublishedParking Authority v. Board of Chosen Freeholders
180 N.J. Super. 282 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jun 24, 1981
See Reilly v. Ozzard, 33 N.J. 529, 544 (1960); but cf. Durgin v. … Co. v. Board of Review, 1 N.J. 545 (1949); Epstein v. Long, supra, 133 N.J.Super. at 599 .
Cited 3 timesPublishedBobertz v. Board of Education of Hillside Twp.
134 N.J.L. 444 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Sep 17, 1946
. *445 Por approximately eight years the respondent was employed as a teacher by the prosecutor, Hillside Board of Education. … Rep. 51 ; Mann et al. v. Board of Education of City of Detroit, 266 Mich. 271 ; 253 N. W. Rep. 294 ; Nehring v. Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Co., 193 Minn. 169 ; 258 N. W. Rep. 307 .
Cited 12 timesPublishedMargate Civic Ass'n v. Board of Commissioners
132 N.J. Super. 58 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jan 16, 1975
Local boards considering applications for such transfers are invested by our Legislature with wide discretion, and their principal guide in making a determination is the public interest. Id., 303; Lubliner v. … Fanwood v. Rocco, 33 N. J. 404, 414 (1960).
Cited 1 timesPublishedTownship of Franklin v. Board of Education
74 N.J. 345 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Sep 22, 1977
See Jacobs v. State Highway Authority, 54 N. J. 393, 396 (1969); McKenna v. N. J. Highway Authority, 19 N. J. 270, 276 (1955); Holloway v. Pennsauken Tp., 12 N. J. 371, 375 (1953); Nelson v. So. … In Jackman v.
Cited 3 timesPublishedBrown Strober Building Supply Corp. v. Fannew Realty, Inc.
174 N.J. Super. 491 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Feb 28, 1980
Id.; see Furlong v. … In Johnson v. Fred L.
Cited 1 timesPublishedMeyer v. Board of Public Utility Commissioners
90 N.J.L. 694 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Oct 11, 1917
Cited 1 timesPublishedNew Jersey State Parole Board v. Cestari
111 N.J. 649 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jul 8, 1988
Cited 1 timesPublishedAlfonso v. BOARD OF REVIEW, DEPT. OF LABOR
89 N.J. 41 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Apr 26, 1982
The Appellate Division rejected these arguments and affirmed the decision of the Board. Alfonso v. Board of Review, Department of Labor and Industry, 176 N.J.Super. 492 (1980). … In DaLomba v.
Cited 16 timesPublishedJeffrey M. Brown Associates, Inc. v. Interstate Fire & Casualty Co.
414 N.J. Super. 160 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jun 23, 2010
Zurich places heavy reliance upon County of Hudson v. … Co. v. Home Indem. Co., 535 F.2d 232, 235 (3d Cir.1976); Great W. Drywall, Inc. v. Interstate Fire & Cas. Co., 161 Cal.App.4th 1033 , 74 Cal.Rptr.3d 657, 664-65 (2008); Carriers Ins. Co. v. Am. Policyholders’ Ins.
Cited 4 timesPublishedBentley v. Board of Adjustment of Lawrence
123 N.J.L. 556 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jan 13, 1940
Prosecutors then sought and obtained a writ of certiorari to review the action of the Board of Adjustment. We are of the opinion that the action of the Board should be set aside. … Cf. 179 Duncan Avenue Corp. v. Jersey City, 122 N. J. L. 292; 5 Atl. Rep. (2d) 68; Spur Distributing Co., Inc., v. Bridgeton, 122 N. J. L. 460; 6 Atl. Rep. (2d) 192.
Cited 1 timesPublishedSigretto v. Board of Adjustment of Rutherford
134 N.J.L. 587 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Feb 1, 1946
Jersey Triangle Corp. v. Board of Adjustment of Jersey City, 127 N. J. L. 194. The limitation upon the use of prosecutor’s land is not within the statute R. S. 40:55-52. Eastern Boulevard Cory. v. Willaredi, 125 N. J. … Brown v. Terhune, 125 Id. 618. The action complained of will be set aside, with costs, and a suitable writ may issue, if necessary, to effectuate this determination.
Cited 1 timesPublishedState Board of Medical Examiners v. Wooding
5 N.J. Misc. 143 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jan 19, 1927
Cited 1 timesPublishedSullivan v. Burlington County Board of Chosen Freeholders
179 N.J. Super. 228 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jun 8, 1981
Their contention as set forth in Sullivan’s brief on this appeal is that “a collective negotiation agreement under the Employer-Employee Relations Act is a legal obligation which cannot be altered by action of the county board … Freeholder Bd. v. Mercer Cty. Prosecutor, 172 N.J.Super. 411 (App.Div.1980); In re Bergen Cty. Freeholder Bd. v. Bergen Cty. Prosecutor, 172 N.J.Super. 363 (App.Div.1980).
Cited 3 timesPublishedTown of Montclair v. State Board of Equalization
88 N.J.L. 374 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Nov 15, 1915
of equalization of taxes of Niew Jersey, which sustained the action of the county board. … The case is similar to, although not identical with, New York Bay Railroad Co. v. Newark, 82 N. J. L. 591, 595.
Cited 8 timesPublishedBorough of Oakland v. Board of Conservation & Development
98 N.J.L. 806 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Sep 21, 1923
Herbert v. Atlantic City, 87 N. J. L. 98, 102; Apple v. Atlantic City, 104 Atl. Rep. 89 ; Brennan v. Jersey City, 104 Id. 90 ; Crane v. Jersey City, 90 N. J. … L. 109; affirmed on opinion by this court, 92 Id. 248; Foley v. Orange, 91 Id. 554; Hewson v.
Cited 5 timesPublishedCain v. New Jersey State Parole Board
77 N.J. 473 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · May 2, 1978
Cited 0 timesPublishedPatterson v. Board of Trustees, State Police Retirement System
194 N.J. 29 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Mar 11, 2008
We granted the board’s petition for certification, 186 N.J. 364 , 895 A.2d 451 (2006), and now reverse. Moore v. Bd. of Trs., State Police Ret. Sys. … Brown, 22 N.J. 405, 415 [ 126 A.2d 161 ] (1956) (internal citations omitted); see also Chase Manhattan Bank v. Josephson, 135 N.J. 209, 225 [ 638 A.2d 1301 ] (1994).]
Cited 101 timesPublished
Ask Donna