Case law

State v. Presley

84 Or. App. 1 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Feb 25, 1987

The trial court’s failure to allow any cross-examination about Brown’s experience as an informant, although it was error, did not likely change the result of the trial. See State v. … In State v.

Fitzpatrick v. Dubois

9 F. Cas. 193 · U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Oregon · May 26, 1873

1S55 and 1856, as follows: Hall of one hundred acres; Smith of one hundred and seventy acres, and Brown of fifty acres. … In Chapman v. School Dist.

State v. Hall

181 Or. App. 536 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · May 29, 2002

See, e.g., State v. … Thus, in State v.

Summerfield v. Or. Liquor Control Comm'n

294 Or. App. 415 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Oct 17, 2018

Both parties provided briefing, following the framework established for admission of scientific evidence in State v. Brown , 297 Or. 404 , 687 P.2d 751 (1984), and State v. O'Key , 321 Or. 285 , 899 P.2d 663 (1995). … If proposed testimony is "scientific," the proponent is "required to comply with the standards *426 for admission of scientific *418 evidence set out in O'Key and * * * Brown [.]" State v.

VanLeeuwen v. Farm Credit Administration

600 F. Supp. 1173 · District Court, D. Oregon · Dec 28, 1984

On May 16, 1984, the day after the order dismissing this case was filed, the WPCA board voted to file a new lawsuit (Coleman, et al. v. … Tom Brown stated that a $1,000,000 capital infusion would be made into the new PCA.

The Wyneric

156 F. 276 · District Court, D. Oregon · Oct 7, 1907

Libelant was in the employ of Brown & McCabe, stevedores, who were under contract with the Pacific Export Lumber Company, charterer of the ship, to load her. … The doctrine was applied in another case (Gerrity v. Bark Kate Cann [D. C.J 2 Fed. 241 ), the facts of which come very near to those out of which the present controversy arises.

Central Oregon Irr. Co. v. Public Service Commission

101 Or. 442 · Oregon Supreme Court · Apr 5, 1921

.” *463 The case of Thayer v. … J., and Brown, J., took no part in the consideration of this case.

State v. Steen

215 Or. App. 635 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Oct 31, 2007

The court imposed consecutive sentences, committing defendant to the jurisdiction of the Psychiatric Security Review Board for a term of 60 years. On appeal, defendant argues that, under Crawford v. … State v. Brown, 310 Or 347, 355 , 800 P2d 259 (1990).

Re Faling Estate

113 Or. 6 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jun 26, 1924

BROWN, J. … Ency. of Law (2 ed.), 828; Nathan v. Peterson, 177 Ill. App. 104 ; 6 Cyc. 880. For a historical review of champerty and maintenance, see opinion of this court by Mr. Justice Bean, in Brown v.

State v. Freeman

345 Or. App. 415 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Dec 3, 2025

Applying the five-factor test set forth in Brown v. Multnomah County Dist. … Brown, 280 Or at 105-06. Defendant does not address the collateral consequences of a probation violation hearing, which likely vary from case to case, and we decline to develop that argument for him. State v.

Saunders v. A. M. Williams & Co.

155 Or. 1 · Oregon Supreme Court · Oct 27, 1936

Some of the boards are quarter-sawn and have vertical grain in them; others have flat grain. *4 They have become worn in some places more than in others and the annular rings in the boards stand out by reason of the wear … Woolworth Co. v. Brown, 258 Ky. 29 ( 79 S. W. (2d) 362 ); Blake v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co., 266 Mass. 12 ( 164 N. E. 486 ).

State v. Wiltse

373 Or. 1 · Oregon Supreme Court · Nov 7, 2024

Ailes v. Portland Meadows, Inc., 312 Or 376, 381-82, 823 P2d 956 (1991) (citing State v. Brown, 310 Or 347, 355-56, 800 P2d 259 (1990)). … State v. Lyon, 304 Or 221, 233, 744 P2d 231 (1987) (citing State v. Brown, 297 Or 404, 440-41, 687 P2d 751 (1984)).

State Ex Rel. Hagquist v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.

125 Or. 13 · Oregon Supreme Court · Mar 2, 1928

Hildebrand v. Feldschau, supra, and the case at bar. … J., and Coshow and Brown, JJ., concur.

State v. Hamilton

330 Or. App. 258 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jan 24, 2024

See State v. … State v.

State v. Freeman

345 Or. App. 415 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Dec 3, 2025

Applying the five-factor test set forth in Brown v. Multnomah County Dist. … Brown, 280 Or at 105-06. Defendant does not address the collateral consequences of a probation violation hearing, which likely vary from case to case, and we decline to develop that argument for him. State v.

Roth v. Troutdale Land Co.

83 Or. 500 · Oregon Supreme Court · Feb 13, 1917

note; Sargent v. … Howe, 21 Ill. 148 ; Walker v. Schreiber, 47 Iowa, 529 ; Foley v. Rose, 123 Mass. 557 ; Brown v. Delaney, 22 Minn. 349 ; Johnson v. Brown , 31 N. H. 405.

Repp v. Wasco County Assessor, Tc-Md 100345c (or.tax 8-31-2010)

Oregon Tax Court · Aug 31, 2010

Defendant was represented by Melanie Brown (Brown). I. STATEMENT OF FACTS The RMV of Plaintiff's property on the assessment and tax rolls, as of January 1, 2009, is $299,290. (Ptf's Compl at 1.) … Paris v. Dept. of Rev. , TC No 4831, WL 4801342 * 1 (Nov 5, 2008), Sherman v. Dept. of Rev. , 17 OTR 322 (2004), Kaady v. Dept. of Rev. , 15 OTR 124 , 125 (2000), Parks Westsac L.L.C. v.

Jones v. SAIF Corp.

123 Or. App. 638 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Oct 6, 1993

Jefferson v. Sam’s Cafe, 123 Or App 464 , 861 P2d 359 (1993).

State v. Sanchez-Cruz

177 Or. App. 332 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Oct 31, 2001

Brown, 297 Or at 417 . The court revisited the question of the foundation required for admissibility of scientific evidence in State v. O’Key, 321 Or 285 , 899 P2d 663 (1995). … The provisions of the Oregon Evidence Code, on which the court in Brown based its analysis, do not distinguish among different kinds of expert testimony. OEC 401; OEC 702; OEC 403. See also Daubert v.

State ex rel. Juvenile Department v. Stevens

89 Or. App. 467 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Feb 10, 1988

He found a brown cloth pouch, some baggies and $110. The child gave Berchard permission to look inside the pouch. It contained methamphetamine. … Thompson v. IDS Life Ins. Co., 274 Or 649, 656 , 549 P2d 510 (1976); State v. Simpson, 11 Or App 271, 273, 501 P2d 1311 (1972), rev den (1973).