Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
3.47s
134 P.3d 816 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Apr 24, 2006
Neither has merit. ¶53 Browning first suggests that our recent decision in DeRosa v. … Wainwright, 741 F.2d 1248, 1252-53 (11th Cir.1984); Brown v. State, 110 Nev. 846 , 877 P.2d 1071, 1072-73 (1994); Thomas v. State, 308 S.C. 123 , 417 S.E.2d 531, 532 (S.Car.1992); Clay v.
Cited 56 timesPublishedPayne County v. Atchison, T. & S. F. Ry. Co.
185 Okla. 32 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 2, 1939
WELCH, V. O. J. This appeal presents the question of whether section 12313, O. S. 1931, 68 Okla. St.
Cited 0 timesPublishedWestern Union Telegraph Co. v. Mexican Agr. Land Co.
31 Okla. 528 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 12, 1912
That a meeting of plaintiff’s board of directors had been called for Friday following the date of said message at Peoria, 111., and, being a member of said board, it was necessary that said Manly be present. … Beach Grove, etc., 64 Ind. 202 ; Piper v. Rhodes, 30 Ind. 309 ; Brown v. Killian, 11 Ind. 449 ; Harriman v. Southam, 16 Ind. 190 ; 1 Thompson Corp., secs. 505, 523.” See, also, Pape v. Capitol Bank, 20 Kan. 440 , 27 Am.
Cited 3 timesPublished783 P.2d 969 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Dec 5, 1989
Centorp Corp. v. Gulf Production Corp., 183 Okl. 436 , 83 P.2d 181 .” (emphasis added). 4 . See Amarex, Inc. v. Baker, Okl., 655 P.2d 1040, 1043 (1983); Prock v. … Const., infra; Brown v. Burkett, Okl., 750 P.2d 481, 482 (1988); Tulsa Tribune Co. v. Okl. Horse Racing Com’n, Okl., 735 P.2d 548, 555 (1987); Moses v. Hoebel, Okl., 646 P.2d 601, 604 (1982).
Cited 12 timesPublishedSouthwestern Bell Telephone Co. v. Oklahoma Corp. Commission
897 P.2d 1116 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Apr 4, 1995
Board of Examiners in Optometry v. Lawton, 523 P.2d 1064, 1065-1066 (Okla.1974). … Board of Examiners in Optometry v. Lawton, 523 P.2d 1064 (Okla.1974), (Supreme Court affirmed declaratory judgment and injunction against Board). Cf. Oklahoma Publishing Co., v.
Cited 12 timesPublishedMercantile Insurance Co. v. Murray
171 Okla. 597 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 19, 1935
Co. v. … Brown v. Franklin Fire Ins. Co. (Cal.) 173 P. 403 ; Kurihara et al. v. Detroit Eire & Marine Ins. Co. (Cal.) 249 P. 215 ; London Assurance Corp. v. Drennen et al., 116 U. S. 461 , 6 Sup. Ct. 442. In J. P. Martin Co. v.
Cited 3 timesPublishedBountwell v. Oklahoma County Board of Commissioners
District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Nov 15, 2022
CIV-22-539-J OKLAHOMA COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS, et al., ) Defendants. … See Nelson v. United States, 40 F.4th 1105, 1109 (10th Cir. 2022). Accordingly, the Court ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation [Doc. No. 14] and DISMISSES Plaintiff's Amended Complaint [Doc.
Cited 0 timesUnknownIndustrial Bldg. & Loan Ass'n v. Williams
131 Okla. 167 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 5, 1928
Snider’s Sons’ Co. v. Troy, 91 Ala. 224 , 8 So. 658 ; Washington Nat. Building, Loan, etc., Ass'n v. Stanley, 38 Ore 319, 63 Pac. 489 ; Brown v. Webb, 60 Ore 526, 120 Pac. 387 . … (Citing Brown v. Webb, 60 Ore 526, 120 Pac. 387 .) “A corporation de facto may legally do and perform every act and thing which the same entity could do or perform were it a de jure corporation.
Cited 7 timesPublished256 F.R.D. 690 · District Court, N.D. Oklahoma · Apr 2, 2009
Brown at Fig. 4.1]. However, Dr. … Brown's report is based on a reliable foundation. .
Cited 3 timesPublishedFrey v. Independence Fire & Casualty Co.
698 P.2d 17 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Apr 2, 1985
Montgomery Ward & Co., supra note 3; Ajax Contractors, Inc. v. Myatt, Okl., 424 P.2d 30, 35 [1967]; McGhee v. McAllister, Okl., 474 P.2d 940 [1970]; Board of County Com’rs of Choctaw Co. v. … Brown v. Brown, Okl., 410 P.2d 52, 56 [1966]; Hambright v. City of Cleveland, Okl., 360 P.2d 493, 496 [1961]; Dodson v. Continental Supply Co., 175 Okl. 587 , 53 P.2d 582 [1936]; All American Bus Lines v.
Cited 106 timesPublished446 P.2d 598 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 5, 1968
See Thrasher v. Board of Governors, Okl., 359 P.2d 717, 725 , and the authorities there cited. That part of the trial court’s judgment in which said section was cited was not essential to its correctness or validity. … In this connection, notice Choctaw Gas Co. v. Corp. *601 Comm., Okl., 295 P.2d 800, 806 , and Brown v. Prince, C.C.A. 10th Cir., 161 F.2d 537, 540 .
Cited 9 timesPublished2017 OK 34 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 2, 2017
See , e.g. , Brown v. … NORRIS Discussed 1960 OK 89, 350 P.2d 948, PECK v. STATE Discussed at Length 1960 OK 231, 356 P.2d 1083, ROSE BROTHERS, INC. v. CITY OF ALVA Discussed 1963 OK 67, 380 P.2d 92, BROWN v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedBank of Commerce of Sulphur v. Webster
70 Okla. 73 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Apr 30, 1918
At the time of such transfer the Security State Bank was in the hands of the banking board, which was liquidating the bank’s assets. … E. 680 ; Ford v. First National Bank (Tex. Civ. App.) 34 S. W. 684 ; Wallace v. Jewell, 21 Ohio St. 163 , 8 Am. Rep. 48 ; Brown v. Johnson Bros., 127 Ala. 292 , 28 South. 579 , 51 L. R. A. 403, 85 Am. St.
Cited 9 timesPublished394 P.2d 456 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jul 14, 1964
As supporting authority for their position respondents cite Board of Com’rs of Pawnee County v. Whitlow et al., 88 Okl. 72 , 211 P. 1021 , and cases from five states which are discussed hereafter. … Johnston v. Franklin et al., 201 Okl. 36 , 200 P.2d 417 , and Brown v. State Election Board, 197 Okl. 169 , 170 P.2d 200 .” In County Board of Equalization, Pittsburg County, Oklahoma v.
Cited 74 timesPublished195 Okla. 501 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 15, 1945
Torrey v. Campbell, 73 Okla. 201 , 175 P. 524 ; Theis v. Board of County Com’rs of Beaver County, 22 Okla. 333 , 97 P. 973 ; Owens et al. v. Clark, 154 Okla. 108 , 6 P. (2d) 755 . 3. … Bradford v. R. C. Brennan & Hattie A. Brown, 12 Okla. 333 ; 71 P. 655 . In the instant case the defendant E. W.
Cited 2 timesPublishedMcKeever Drilling Co. v. Egbert
170 Okla. 259 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Dec 27, 1934
. & Bill Garage v. Ind. Com., 94 Okla. 187 , 221 P. 470 , holding it is in the nature of a “board of arbitration”; and Union Indemnity Co. v. … Co. v.
Cited 97 timesPublishedCORBEIL v. EMRICKS VAN & STORAGE
2017 OK 71 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 19, 2017
Brown , 2017 OK 13, ¶20 ( quoting Wylie v. Chesser , 2007 OK 81, ¶19, 173 P.3d 64). … Fund v. Figgins Discussed at Length 1955 OK 198, 285 P.2d 1034, BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS v. WARRAM Discussed 2001 OK 110, 37 P.3d 882, 72 OBJ 3672, KEATING v.
Cited 0 timesPublished65 Okla. 199 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 22, 1917
Hankin v. … See, also, Shriver et al. v. State, 32 Okla. 507 , 122 Pac. 160 ; State v. Hines et al., 37 Okla. 198 , 131 Pac. 688 , Ann. Cas. 1915B, 431; Hines et al., v. State, 39 Okla. 638 , 136 Pac. 592 .
Cited 2 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Aug 31, 1993
THE 1981 LAW CAME ABOUT AS THE RESULT OF THE CASE OF KIRK V. BOARD OF CTY.COM'RS. MUSKOGEE CTY, 595 P.2D 1334 (OKLA.1979), WHICH ESSENTIALLY STRUCK DOWN THE 1978 SALARY SCHEDULE. … THE CASE IS KAVANAQH V. BROWN, 206 F.SUPP. 479 (E.D.MICH. 1962). THE DECISION BY THE FEDERAL DISTRICT COURT IN KAVANAAH WAS ULTIMATELY APPEALED TO THE UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT AND WAS SUMMARILY AFFIRMED. KAVANAQH V.
Cited 0 timesPublishedState Ex Rel. State Board of Embalmers & Funeral Directors v. Stone Casket Co. of Oklahoma City
70 O.B.A.J. 1243 · Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · Oct 2, 1998
Nordlinger v. Hahn, 505 U.S. 1 , 112 S.Ct. 2326 , 120 L.Ed.2d 1 (1992) (citing Cleburne v. Cleburne Living Center, Inc., 473 U.S. 432 , 105 S.Ct. 3249 , 87 L.Ed.2d 313 (1985); New Orleans v. … State of Oklahoma v. McDonald, 1989 OK CIV APP 35 , 787 P.2d 466 .
Cited 1 timesPublished
Ask Donna