The opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA
MATTHEW O. BOUNTWELL, )
Plaintiff,
Vv. Case No. CIV-22-539-J
OKLAHOMA COUNTY BOARD OF
COMMISSIONERS, et al., )
Defendants.
ORDER
Plaintiff, while incarnated, filed an Amended Complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983.
[Doc. No. 6]. The matter was referred to United States Magistrate Judge Suzanne Mitchell for
initial proceedings consistent with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B), (C). Judge Mitchell granted
Plaintiff's motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis but after Plaintiff's release from custody,
she ordered him to submit a new in forma pauperis application detailing his financial status. [Doc.
No. 13]. Plaintiff failed to do so, and Judge Mitchell issued a Report and Recommendation
recommending the action be dismissed without prejudice. [Doc. No. 14]. Plaintiff did not object
and has waived any right to appellate review of the factual and legal issues in the Report and
Recommendation. See Nelson v. United States, 40 F.4th 1105, 1109 (10th Cir. 2022).
Accordingly, the Court ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation [Doc. No. 14] and
DISMISSES Plaintiff's Amended Complaint [Doc. No. 6] without prejudice.
IT IS SO ORDERED this 15" day of November, 2022.
CU 2 mM.
BERNARD M. JONES
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE