Case law

Fresh & Easy Neighborhood Market Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board

459 F. App'x 1 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Mar 13, 2012

We conclude that the Board’s decision that Fresh & Easy Neighborhood Market Inc. unlawfully encouraged an employee to quit in response to protected activity and promulgated two unlawful oral rules, one prohibiting an employee

Randell Warehouse of Arizona, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board

252 F.3d 445 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 12, 2001

It is our responsibility to examine carefully both the Board’s findings and its reasoning....’” General Elec. Co. v. NLRB, 117 F.3d 627, 630 (D.C.Cir.1997) (quoting Peoples Gas Sys., Inc. v. … Inc. v. NLRB, 44 F.3d 1010, 1016 (D.C.Cir.1995); *449 accord Gilbert v.

Neighbors Against Foxhall Gridlock v. District of Columbia Board of Zoning Adjustment

792 A.2d 246 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Feb 28, 2002

Kopff v. … In stating that its role was “limited,” the Board used that term in the precise sense the court did in Stewart v.

No. 93-1767

50 F.3d 1088 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Apr 7, 1995

Brown & Sharpe Mfg. Co., 312 N.L.R.B. 444 , 445, 1993 WL 382495 (1993) ("Brown & Sharpe II") (quoting Fitzgerald v. Seamans, 553 F.2d 220, 228 (D.C.Cir.1977)). … See, e.g., Hohri v.

Wilson v. Office of the Chairperson, District of Columbia Board of Parole

892 F. Supp. 277 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jun 29, 1995

See Bennett v. … See Guerra v.

$6200.00 in United States Currency v. District of Columbia

250 A.2d 551 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Feb 25, 1969

. *552 Appellant Brown was arrested pursuant to a warrant in a grocery store where he worked in Southeast Washington and his residence immediately next door was searched pursuant to a search warrant. … Marcus v. Hess, 317 U.S. 537, 549 , 63 S.Ct. 379 , 87 L.Ed. 443 (1943); Helvering v. Mitchell, 303 U.S. 391, 400 , 58 S.Ct. 630 , 82 L.Ed. 917 (1938); Waterloo Distilling Corp. v.

Local 666 v. National Labor Relations Board

904 F.2d 47 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · May 29, 1990

Boise Cascade Corp. v. … Fibreboard Corp. v.

Diamond Walnut Growers, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board

88 F.3d 1064 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jul 11, 1996

88 F.3d 1064 319 U.S.App.D.C. 1 DIAMOND WALNUT GROWERS, INC., Petitioner, v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Respondent.

Puerto Rico Steamship Association v. National Labor Relations Board

281 F.2d 615 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 23, 1960

B. v. … We recognize the following holding of the Supreme Court in National Labor Relations Board v.

Kohler Co. v. National Labor Relations Board

345 F.2d 748 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Apr 20, 1965

, and whether any of the 77 strikers denied reinstatement by the Board should be reinstated in light of the principles enunciated in National Labor Relations Board v. … The Board properly applied the principles announced in our initial decision, and its determinations are supported by substantial evidence on the record viewed as a whole, Universal Camera Corp. v.

International Ass'n of MacHinists & Aerospace Workers v. National Mediation Board

725 F. Supp. 558 · District Court, District of Columbia · Oct 24, 1989

In Local 808, Building Maintenance, Service and Railroad Workers v. National Mediation Board, No. 88-1730, — F.Supp. - (D.D.C. … See Order, Building Maintenance, Service and Railroad Workers v. National Mediation Board, 888 F.2d 1428 (D.C.Cir.1989). IV.

Joseph T. Ryerson & Son, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board

216 F.3d 1146 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jul 7, 2000

In any event, an implicit argument is hardly the same as giving notice so the Board has an opportu- nity to rule on the argument. Cf. Alois Box Co. v. NLRB, No. 99-1340, slip. op. at 13-14 (D.C. Cir. … See NLRB v. Blackstone Mfg. Co., 123 F.2d 633, 635 (2d Cir. 1944); cf. Carothers v. Pressler, 818 F.2d 926, 934 (D.C.

Local 164, Brotherhood of Painters v. National Labor Relations Board

293 F.2d 133 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Apr 27, 1961

National Labor *135 Relations Board v. Wooster Division of Borg-Warner Corp., 1958, 856 U.S. 342 , 349, 78 S.Ct. 718 , 2 L.Ed.2d 823 . … Textile Workers of America v.

Apfel v. Mellon

33 F.2d 805 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jun 3, 1929

Dodd v. Hill, Banking Commissioner, 84 W. Va. 468 , 100 S. … Schweder v. Brady, Auditor of Public Accounts, 268 Ill. 192 , 108 N.

Judicial Watch v. Department of Army

466 F. Supp. 2d 112 · District Court, District of Columbia · Dec 12, 2006

Vice-President Richard Cheney previously served as Halliburton’s Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board. Pl.’s Opp’n to Def.’s Mot. for Summ. J. (“Pl.’s Opp’n”) at 1. … Orloff v.

Singletary, Charles v. DC Bd Par

452 F.3d 868 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jul 7, 2006

Before: SENTELLE and BROWN, Circuit Judges, and EDWARDS, Senior Circuit Judge.  2 Opinion for the Court filed by Circuit Judge BROWN. … See also Gagnon v.

International Union, United Mine Workers v. National Labor Relations Board

468 F.2d 1139 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Oct 2, 1972

We therefore remanded the case to the Board for further consideration. Lewis v. NLRB, 122 U.S.App.D.C. 18 , 350 F.2d 801 (1965). … The union’s petition for review (No. 21,129) and the Board’s cross-petition for enforcement (No. 21,226) were then consolidated in this court, and in Int. Union, United Mine Workers v.

United States v. Singhal

876 F. Supp. 2d 82 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 11, 2012

United States v. Brown, 504 F.3d 99, 104 (D.C. Cir. 2007) (internal quotation and citations omitted). … (including Brown), corroborate testimony, or assist with impeachment of witnesses at trial (including Brown).

Mayor of Washington City v. Meigs

8 D.C. 53 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Apr 15, 1873

North Carolina State Board of Elections v. United States

206 F. Supp. 2d 31 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jun 27, 2002

Corp. v. … See Sample v. Jenkins, No. 02-CV-383 (E.D.N.C. filed June 13, 2002); Foreman v. Bartlett, No. 01-CV-166 (E.D.N.C. filed Nov. 13, 2001).