Opinion

Kohler Co. v. National Labor Relations Board

  • 345 F.2d 748
Court
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Filed
Apr 20, 1965
Status
Published
Cited by
0 cases
Authority
More cited than 18.3%

The opinion

PER CURIAM.

In a former appeal 1 we enforced in large part a previous Board order, but remanded the case to the Board for further consideration of two questions: whether the strike was an unfair labor practice strike from its inception, and whether any of the 77 strikers denied reinstatement by the Board should be reinstated in light of the principles enunciated in National Labor Relations Board v. Thayer Co., 218 F.2d 748 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 348 U.S. 883 , 75 S.Ct. 123 , 99 L.Ed. 694 (1954). On remand the Board determined that the strike was an unfair labor practice from its inception, and that 57 of the 74 surviving strikers who had been denied reinstatement should be reinstated. The Kohler Company petitions for review.

The Board properly applied the principles announced in our initial decision, and its determinations are supported by substantial evidence on the record viewed as a whole, Universal Camera Corp. v. National Labor Relations Board, 340 U.S. 474 , 71 S.Ct. 456 , 95 L.Ed. 456 (1951). The petition for review will be denied, and the Board’s supplementary order enforced in full.

So ordered.

WILBUR K. MILLER, Senior Circuit Judge, dissents.

. 112 U.S.App.D.C. 107 , 300 F.2d 699 , cert. denied 370 U.S. 911 , 82 S.Ct. 1258 , 8 L.Ed.2d 405 (1962).

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.