Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

FiltersOK

10,000+ results

4.28s

  • Sanchez v. Muskogee County Board of County Commissioners

    District Court, E.D. Oklahoma · Oct 30, 2023

    ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. … The motion is granted to the extent certain examination topics, as outlined below, have been stricken pursuant to, inter alia, Burke v. Glanz, 2013 WL 4521172 (N.D. Okla. Aug. 26, 2013) and LabXpress, LLC v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • One Buick Automobile, Model D. 44 v. State

    72 Okla. 255 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Apr 15, 1919

    On September 23, 1918, the sheriff of Logan county, by his deputy, filed his verified return in the district court of said county, reciting that he had seized the Buick automobile roadster, and arrested one Ofa Brown, who … The questions urged in this case are identical with those presented in No. 10424, One Cadillac Automobile v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • POLK v. STATE

    2022 OK CR 24 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Sep 29, 2022

    POLK v. STATE 2022 OK CR 24 Case Number: F-2021-343 Decided: 09/29/2022 JESSICA MARIE POLK, Appellant v. … Id. at 319 ; Davis v. State , , ¶ 74, , 111.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Bd. of Com'rs of Cleveland v. Stogner, Clerk of Court

    57 Okla. 709 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 16, 1916

    compel Jim Stog-ner, court clerk of Cleveland county, Okla., to certify and file, as required by law, a transcript of the record in a certain cause then pending in the county court of Cleveland county, Okla., wherein the board … In McCullough et al. v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Fulsom-Morris Coal & Mining Co. v. Mitchell

    37 Okla. 575 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 11, 1913

    Co. v. Marks, 11 Okla. 82 , 65 Pac. 996 ; Citizens’ Bank v. Garnett, 21 Okla. 200 , 95 Pac. 775 ; Coalgate Co. v. Hurst, 25 Okla. 588 , 107 Pac. 658 ; Finch v. Brown, 27 Okla. 217 , 111 Pac. 391 . … Hampton and Moore boarded with Mrs. Garrison, where plaintiff boarded and roomed, and where they had full opporunity to become informed of his physical condition.

    Cited 23 timesPublished
  • Smith v. Beam

    176 Okla. 408 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jan 21, 1936

    In the case of Whitehair et al. v. … Thompson v. Renfrow, 148 Okla. 8 , 296 P. 404 ; Reynolds v. Reynolds, 148 Okla. 13 , 296 P. 962 ; Weeks v. Davis, 148 Okla. 230 , 298 P. 267 .

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Bridgess v. Youree

    436 F. Supp. 458 · District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Feb 17, 1977

    Plaintiff asserts that Defendants were to be paid a specified amount for boarding the animal as well as a commission on the sale price of the same. … Southwestern Bell Telephone Co. v. Brown, 519 P.2d 491 (Okl.1974). Fraud is a tort. Combs v. Chambers, 283 F.Supp. 295 (N.D.Okl.1968). Under Oklahoma law, punitive damages are recoverable in tort actions for fraud.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Hays v. State

    22 Okla. Crim. 99 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Nov 22, 1922

    State v. Bunch, 23 Okla. Cr.—, 214 Pac. 1093 . … Warner v. Mathews, 11 Okla. Cr. 122 , 143 Pac. 516 ; McDaniel v. Brown, 16 Okla. Cr. 149 , 181 Pac. 156 .

    Cited 30 timesPublished
  • Dye v. McIntosh County Board of Commissioners

    District Court, E.D. Oklahoma · Oct 29, 2024

    The defendants are the State of Oklahoma (District Attorney’s Office), the McIntosh County Board of County Commissioners, and Jail Administrator Monica Smith. … Erickson v. Pardus, 551 U.S. 89, 94 (2007); Haines v. Kerner, 404 U.S. 519, 520 (1972).

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Shaver v. McIntosh County Board of Commissioners

    District Court, E.D. Oklahoma · Oct 29, 2024

    The defendants are the McIntosh County Board of Commissioners; Monica Smith, Jail Administrator; and the State of Oklahoma (DA Office). … Erickson v. Pardus, 551 U.S. 89, 94 (2007); Haines v. Kerner, 404 U.S. 519, 520 (1972).

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Lewis v. Aubrey

    404 P.2d 1005 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 22, 1965

    Wells, 79 Okl. 39 , 191 P. 186 , Methvin v. Methvin, 191 Okl. 177 , 127 P.2d 186 , and Coppedge v. Clinton, U.S.C.A., 10th Cir., 72 F.2d 531 . Notice, also, Board of County Commissioners v. … Brown, 100 Cal. 626 , 35 P. 323 , and Brown v. Campbell, 100 Cal. 635 , 35 P. 433 , 38 Am.St.Rep. 314 , described in Footnote 17, page 988).

    Cited 13 timesPublished
  • Board of Equalization of Kingfisher Co. v. Hennessey State Bank

    102 Okla. 212 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 3, 1924

    On a regular hearing before the board of equalization, the board sustained the assessment as made and the bank and stockholders duly appealed to the district court. … It knew that the only method of changing a valuation fixed by the county board of equalization was by appeal and that no question could be reviewed on appeal not presented to the board. Atoka County v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Noble v. City of Bethany

    206 Okla. 122 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 13, 1951

    In Browne v. … Co. v.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • State Ex Rel. Oklahoma State Bureau of Investigation v. Warren

    975 P.2d 900 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Dec 28, 1998

    Oklahoma Alcoholic Beverage Control Board, 1984 OK CIV APP 58 , 696 P.2d 1046, 1050 ; Oklahoma Alcoholic Beverage Control Board v. Seely, 1980 OK 1989 , 621 P.2d 534, 538-39 (Opala, J., concurring in result). . … Johnson v. Board of Governors of Registered Dentists, 1996 OK 41 , 913 P.2d 1339, 1350 (Opala, J., concurring); Ross v.

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Oklahoma Portland Cement Co. v. Smith

    181 Okla. 313 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 26, 1937

    We have said in Kansas Explorations, Inc., v. … Oklahoma Hospital v. Brown, 87 Okla. 46 , 208 P. 785 ; Fain Drilling Co. v. Deatherage, 179 Okla. 409 , 65 P. (2d) 1212 ; Wilcox Oil & Gas Co. v. Satterfield, supra. The award is affirmed. OSBORN, C.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Sellers v. Corporation Commission

    624 P.2d 1061 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 24, 1981

    Sellers seeks to vacate a forced pooling order of the Corporation Commission [Order No. 140283] because he asserts: 1) the applicant, Curt Brown Drilling Co., appellee, did not unconditionally propose to drill a well on the … Anderson v. Corporation Commission, 327 P.2d 699, 703 (Olk.1958); Superior Oil Co. v. Corporation Commission, 206 Okl. 213 , 242 P.2d 454 (1952); Croxton v. State, 186 Okl. 249 , 97 P.2d 11 (1939).

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • North v. McMahan

    26 Okla. 502 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 31, 1910

    Brooks v. … Board of County Com’rs, 33 Kan. 202 , 6 Pac. 311 , 52 Am. Rep. 526 ; State ex rel. Johnston v.

    Cited 18 timesPublished
  • Excise Board of Noble County v. Stanolind Pipe Line Co.

    183 Okla. 45 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 31, 1938

    Co. v. … In Albrecht v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Miller v. Corporation Commission

    635 P.2d 1006 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 5, 1981

    Brown & Lockhart by Gordon F. Brown, Oklahoma City, for appellants. Harry C. Marberry, Oklahoma City, for appellees. *1007 OPALA, Justice. … Allied Chemical Corp. v. Union County Board of Supervisors, 511 S.W.2d 196, 198 [Ky. 1974].

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • In Re Kohpay's Estate

    206 Okla. 548 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 3, 1952

    Brown, 185 Okla. 234 , 90 P. 2d 1071 , that the Globe Indemnity Company case and the case of Bruce v. … The case of Tucker v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.